• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Vertical Sharp Round Hole in WTC7

chipmunk stew said:
Other than beam weapons? Hmm... Let's see:
  • the mighty hammer of Thor
  • the mighty drillpress of Bob
  • disruption of the quantum field
  • a tiny black hole
  • a tiny tornado
  • a train
  • a big-ass piece of debris from a collapsing building
I'm guessing it's one of those.
Click to expand...

LOFL!!!
 
If attacks I make are going to be reported by spiteful observers like that then I shall adopt the same policy of reporting. Childish but fair.
 
tonicblue said:
Truthseeker1234, I am not a JREF skeptic. In fact I am on your side of the fence in terms of wanting a new investigation into 911. However, I am going to be less polite and more forthright than the Jrefers.

◊◊◊◊ Off Truthtwister1234. You are an idiot who is playing a game that I dont even think you know the purpose of.


Keep in mind your membership agreement requires you to be civil to other members. Don't personalize the debate by including personal insults.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
Click to expand...

I apologise Jmercer. I let emotion get the better of me. I shall make no more personal attacks.

I will make sure any such attacks by others are brought to your attention.

Everyone can thank Arkan for me seeing the light.
 
tonicblue said:
I apologise Jmercer. I let emotion get the better of me. I shall make no more personal attacks.

I will make sure any such attacks by others are brought to your attention.

Everyone can thank Arkan for me seeing the light.
Click to expand...
Everyone agreed to the same user membership agreement, and everyone has equal access to the "Report Post" button.

Why is it so many CFists have trouble grasping this concept?
 
The motivation for that report was clearly a belief that he had somehow lost an argument earlier. He has stamped his foot. I now am well aware of the report button and will use it as it was intended.
 
Mr. Skinny said:
I think we're on to something now. A ground based laser located in WTC 7 focused the beam off of a cloaked aircraft.

First, they destroyed the Twin Towers. Then, when the aircraft was directly overhead, they fired the beam at themselves in WTC 7, destroying all the evidence that the laser ever existed.

The diesel fuel was in WTC 7 in order to fuel the generators that powered the laser, and was later used to create the fires, thus making WTC 7 appear to collapse from fire (and structural damage from the collapsing tower).

Any flaws in that theory, chipmunk?
Click to expand...
It's brilliant! One flaw and a couple gaps, though. It wasn't a laser--it was some sort of beam that could be tuned to dustify steel or strip the paint off cars, whichever you need at the time. When the beam ignited the diesel fuel, it also triggered the thermite charges that pre-weakened the columns. The destructo-beam was located in the East penthouse, and to pull the building, the beam was set to reverse and evaporated the column holding it up, causing it to drop through the building and trigger a chain reaction on the thermite-weakened columns.
 
tonicblue said:
The motivation for that report was clearly a belief that he had somehow lost an argument earlier. He has stamped his foot. I now am well aware of the report button and will use it as it was intended.
Click to expand...
You can discern motive of other people over the internet? Cool! Can you teach me how to do that? Is there a school I have to go to? Special diet? Do I get to wear a special badge?
 
tonicblue said:
The motivation for that report was clearly a belief that he had somehow lost an argument earlier. He has stamped his foot. I now am well aware of the report button and will use it as it was intended.
Click to expand...
What button do we use if you ever find a fact to support the 9/11 truth movement of lies?

Have you found some facts or just still passing on your high level of, "why not"?

TS1234 has special problems with understanding physics and seems to be in love with Judy Woods and her beam weapon. He is indicative of all 9/11 truthers, not able to think for himself.
 
beachnut said:
What button do we use if you ever find a fact to support the 9/11 truth movement of lies?

Have you found some facts or just still passing on your high level of, "why not"?

TS1234 has special problems with understanding physics and seems to be in love with Judy Woods and her beam weapon. He is indicative of all 9/11 truthers, not able to think for himself.
Click to expand...

I have reported that personal attack on TS1234.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Mackey's objections mostly revolved around the weight of an orbiting power supply. We must consider the possibility that the power supply is earth based, and uses arrays of orbiting reflectors.
Click to expand...
Do you even realize how horribly inefficient that is?
 
chipmunk stew said:
It's brilliant! One flaw and a couple gaps, though. It wasn't a laser--it was some sort of beam that could be tuned to dustify steel or strip the paint off cars, whichever you need at the time. When the beam ignited the diesel fuel, it also triggered the thermite charges that pre-weakened the columns. The destructo-beam was located in the East penthouse, and to pull the building, the beam was set to reverse and evaporated the column holding it up, causing it to drop through the building and trigger a chain reaction on the thermite-weakened columns.
Click to expand...
Not sure if a laser could dustify steel, but they can definitely be used to strip paint off cars. The AF uses them to strip paint off of planes. The power level of a laser is easily adjusted, so that's no problem either.

The laser operator operates the device remotely and also initiates the thermite fuses just before firing the final down-shot onto the building penthouse.

Once I figure out how to dustify steel, we're golden baby!!!!
 
tonicblue said:
Not just inefficient but totally unnecessary.

TS1234, why would they set up an array of reflecting space beam reflectors rather than just put bombs in there?
Click to expand...
Because nothing says "Evil Genius" like orbiting space lasers, and inefficiency!
 
tonicblue said:
◊◊◊◊ Off Truthtwister1234. You are an idiot who is playing a game that I dont even think you know the purpose of.


Keep in mind your membership agreement requires you to be civil to other members. Don't personalize the debate by including personal insults.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: jmercer
Click to expand...

beachnut said:
TS1234 has special problems with understanding physics and seems to be in love with Judy Woods and her beam weapon. He is indicative of all 9/11 truthers, not able to think for himself.
Click to expand...

tonicblue said:
I have reported that personal attack on TS1234.
Click to expand...


Oh, yeah, totally comparable, those two.

:jedi:
 
tonicblue said:
I have reported that personal attack on TS1234.
Click to expand...
It is a simple observation. Just as you appear to be acting like pdoh, a poster with many names. Like Docker, JessicaRabbit, et al.. And I say that because he, or they, had no real facts and are doing like you and I just posting about not much of anything.

Yet TS1234 does have problems with physics, and if you understood physics you could tell him what specific areas he is deficient in. A hint would be in the "amount of energy" required to run his beam weapon. There are beam weapons and the government has a beam weapon, it has even destroyed a missile. If you and TS1234 understood physics you could explain why that beam weapon would not work to do in the WTC.

I assume I am correct until you present some neat numbers to prove me wrong. But you could try to find some facts and stop with the "why not" stuff.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom