HAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
So you are saying "THEY" "HAVE" photos of this OBVIOUSLY very STRAIGHT cut in the building, BUT, don't have to and won't share.
HOWEVER!!!!, every other image they HAVE used in their reports(at least I think it's pictures and videos that I am witnessing in their reports) is "OK" to show and share. How do they draw the line? WHO chooses what images are "OK" to show the public and "NOT OK"?
So let's recap your point. They use images and video stills in their reports that are NOT theirs. And they supposedly have very clear images of building 7 that they have decided not to share, oh yeah, YET.
WOW, solid stuff. Keep up the great work. You're useless.
Hmmmmm...where to begin.
While I appreciate your desire to speak for me Koog, you shouldnt put words in my mouth. What I was indicating was that any footage, video or photo, is owned by those who shot it, and is theirs to release or not. Short of being a representative of an organization with the legal right to obtain forcibly, said video/photo, neither you, nor truthseeker, are entitled to any of it unless it has been made free to the public.
Thanks for the welcome, I am not here to slap fight, that wastes time.
HOWEVER, you say what? He is a polite and patient poster. This is what I've gathered by him in this thread:
I know you're not that stupid to have said you're not here to slap fight after the derogatory/inflammatory post you posted in response to my comments. Just be a man and admit you flamed me...I can take it.
Post 1. “Footage is a copy of a copy of a copy by the looks of it. The compression is horrid.
Show me the original footage from the station, not some F&*King low rez barely viewable footage from google. You tried the same thing with your alleged "Nose Cone out the other side" crap.
Try again.
TAM”
Post 2. “they havent let the bum down the street look at them either. In other words who the hell are "you" to have access to such things. Do you represent any official organization that should have access to such things?
TAM”
Post 3. “Thanks for the link, but even 640x480 is low rez for this type of thing.
I feel that they do not owe anyone anything. They are private companies. They own the footage. Who do they have an "obligation" to provide this to?
TAM”
Post 4. “Seems to me the perfect debris to cut such a slice would be a long piece of steel. Any long pieces of steel in the WTCs?
lol
TAM”
Post 5. So this video/photo, to us in the sane business, proves the debris damage was enormous, and adds evidence to the effect of debris to damage of WTC7 and its ultimate collapse.
To the truthers, particularly ACE and the no-planers, it proves that a High Energy Beam weapon was used...because only such a weapon could cause such a clean cut.
So what is the solution to this differing of opinions?
TAM”
Post 6. I think a larger version of one of the Tripod aliens from "War of the Worlds" could have created such a hole.”
Post 7. I AGREE
tonic:
1. I agree that sometimes, that some of us here let others "attacks" slide a little if they are made against a "truther". that doesnt make it right, but it happens.
2. If slackness in reporting occurs, it may in some cases be a matter of degree and the vitriol.
TAM
That is how you are suppose to quote someone here Koog. Try it the next time.
Yeah, sounds like he is being polite and nice. Actually it sounds like he's being a condisending jitbag. But thats ok, I can be too. We all can.
What is a jitbag? Would I like being one? Condisending...to someone like TS or you, absolutely...I do not disagree there.
I am torn here. Should I simply give you what you want, get angry, and throw some nasty insults at you? It would be instantly gratifying to me, but I prefer to let the pigs wallow in the mud by themselves. I think I will pass.
Here's my main point, and then I most likely will not post again until I can ADD to a discussion.
So I guess you won't be around anymore then.
Where is the: "yeah, it would be nice to see those NIST pics they aren't sharing, I wonder if they will shed any light on building seven's OBVIOUS bizarre collapse. Because ball busting or not, IT LOOKS LIKE Controlled Demolition. I'll repeat, IT LOOKS LIKE IT. Is it? I don't KNOW either. But even nice and polite TAM has to admit IT LOOKS LIKE ONE.
Been following my posts a bit eh? stalking me are we? Yes, to me, the collapse of WTC7, strictly looking at the video, has the visual appearance of a CD type collapse.
So if all you want to do is bash people for their views, I'm being given the impression that it must be ok to bash YOUR views (which are appearently to just laugh at any other view or idea thats not yours)(scrutiny is one thing). You bash mine, I'll bash yours. Thats what I seem to be seeing.
Have you seen the thread I created on being more civil to the newcomers. For you, given you have started the insult ball running on me personally, I will make an exception for. Anyone who wants to tear you a new proverbial A&SHOLE, may do so, I could care less about you or your feelings.
I'm not here to offend, just defend when it seems people are beating up someone instead of constructively debating or sharing or whatever it is people do here.
That's what I saw from this guy in THIS thread, I may be wrong.
Like most truthers you jump in the middle of something, not knowing the context. It is in keeping with the general movements MO.
TS is a chronic poster, insane, a no-planer, who almost every person in here will say is totally unreasonable, and out to lunch. I personally have no respect for him, as he has slandered me on more than one occasion, and slanders other people here all the time. TS gives as he gets, so you do not need to defend him.
Remember, when the truth is known, most of the other side will allow you all to save face.
The truth is known, and when the MSM are forced to deal with you and your ilk, and the general public are exposed to your crap on a larger level, you will not be able to save face. Those few friends you have that don't think you are loony toons, will know for sure then, that you are.
TAM
