• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Vertical Sharp Round Hole in WTC7

Horatius said:
This "cylinder" appears to be parallel to the face of the building. We can also assume it's parallel to the beam that made it, right? So, by projecting that line outwards, can we determine exactly where the beam came from?

R.Mackey has pretty conclusively shown that such a beam could not be a space-based weapon, but from this "cylinder", it looks to me like it could not have come from anywhere else. So maybe, just maybe, it wasn't the beam that caused this bit of damage*.






*Ridiculous suggestion, I know, but we must consider all options!
Click to expand...
It was probably cleverly reflected off of a satellite mirror, so as to follow a perfect plumb line down to Ground Zero.

I just gave you an out, TS. Take it to Judy right away. She's waiting on the balcony. Go serenade her with this new idea. You can thank me later.
 
Ya know, on second inspection with the HST from space, I looked more carefully at that opening photo from 'toothreeker' and behold, that whole photo is just crawling with billions of thermites. Tons of 'em. Pesky thermites. Who could have guessed.

RAMS
 
beachnut said:
Wait! news just in a photo from ground zero confirms what people saw cutting and knocking down the WTC complex!
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1244746040fec70f90.jpg
This transformer was finally stopped on 9/11 by a young kid with a small cricket pocket blaster. The kid shot the transformer as he was cutting a very large 20 story gash into WTC7. If the quick thinking kid had not shot the YellowJacketNeoConTransformer, firemen inspecting WTC7 would have been crushed by building parts. TOP SECRET NOFOR WINTEL
Click to expand...



Poor BumbleBee, the last thing he needs to be drawn into, is being blamed for 911. The AutoBots are already undermanned as it is.
 
beachnut said:
haaa haaa halaaaaaaaa haahaahahhahahahahahahahahhaa

hahahahahahahahahahahahaha

hahahahahahaha

If you can not laugh for a moment at TS1234

Haaa hahhhaaaahaaaaa hahaha

Should I include the MP3 version, if it would make money we could release HAHAAA HAHAA on SACD or DVD audio.

Buy the "HAAAHAAA HAAA" DVD today so you laugh along with total idiots know as the nuts and dolts of 9/11 truth, as they uncover Beam Weapons, mini Nukes, and dustify steel all day.

19.95 shipping included.

Wait! news just in a photo from ground zero confirms what people saw cutting and knocking down the WTC complex!
[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/1244746040fec70f90.jpg[/qimg]
This transformer was finally stopped on 9/11 by a young kid with a small cricket pocket blaster. The kid shot the transformer as he was cutting a very large 20 story gash into WTC7. If the quick thinking kid had not shot the YellowJacketNeoConTransformer, firemen inspecting WTC7 would have been crushed by building parts. TOP SECRET NOFOR WINTEL
Click to expand...



Lord, I am in tears over the transformer.......

RAMS
 
Footage is a copy of a copy of a copy by the looks of it. The compression is horrid.

Show me the original footage from the station, not some F&*King low rez barely viewable footage from google. You tried the same thing with your alleged "Nose Cone out the other side" crap.

Try again.

TAM:)
 
chipmunk stew said:
The footage wasn't deliberately hidden by "them", genius.

Someone happened along this archival footage ON THE INTERNET and noticed that it had a rare view of the South side damage to the building.
Click to expand...

NIST claims to have photographs of the south face showing the hole. The editors of Popular Mechanics claimed to have been shown them, in preperation for their book.

"They" certainly haven't let "us" look at those, and I think it's about time "they" do.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
NIST claims to have photographs of the south face showing the hole. The editors of Popular Mechanics claimed to have been shown them, in preperation for their book.

"They" certainly haven't let "us" look at those, and I think it's about time "they" do.
Click to expand...

they havent let the bum down the street look at them either. In other words who the hell are "you" to have access to such things. Do you represent any official organization that should have access to such things?

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
Footage is a copy of a copy of a copy by the looks of it. The compression is horrid.

Show me the original footage from the station, not some F&*King low rez barely viewable footage from google. You tried the same thing with your alleged "Nose Cone out the other side" crap.
Click to expand...

Here is a 640x480 video of the WTC7 hole.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CV4PU0IQ

I would love nothing better than to find the highest resolution copies of all the 9/11 TV footage. That would be up to the television stations. BBC "lost" all of theirs. Don't you agree that Fox, CNN, et al. should release hi res copies of everything? Or did they "lose" them?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Here is a 640x480 video of the WTC7 hole.

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CV4PU0IQ

I would love nothing better than to find the highest resolution copies of all the 9/11 TV footage. That would be up to the television stations. BBC "lost" all of theirs. Don't you agree that Fox, CNN, et al. should release hi res copies of everything? Or did they "lose" them?
Click to expand...

Thanks for the link, but even 640x480 is low rez for this type of thing.

I feel that they do not owe anyone anything. They are private companies. They own the footage. Who do they have an "obligation" to provide this to?

TAM:)
 
T.A.M. said:
they havent let the bum down the street look at them either. In other words who the hell are "you" to have access to such things. Do you represent any official organization that should have access to such things?

TAM:)
Click to expand...

For starters, government documents and photographs are public domain.

But the real issue is the concept of "official organization". The whole problem is that the "official organization" DID 9/11. It is not reasonable to expect criminals to investigate themselves.
 
Horatius said:
This "cylinder" appears to be parallel to the face of the building. We can also assume it's parallel to the beam that made it, right? So, by projecting that line outwards, can we determine exactly where the beam came from?

R.Mackey has pretty conclusively shown that such a beam could not be a space-based weapon, but from this "cylinder", it looks to me like it could not have come from anywhere else. So maybe, just maybe, it wasn't the beam that caused this bit of damage*.
Click to expand...

Mackey's objections mostly revolved around the weight of an orbiting power supply. We must consider the possibility that the power supply is earth based, and uses arrays of orbiting reflectors.

I am open to other explanations for the cylindrical 9/11 holes, and the other strange phenonmena. Falling rubble? How could falling rubble cut so cleanly?
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
For starters, government documents and photographs are public domain.
Click to expand...



I've seen people assert this before, but is it really true? Or is it true for some classes of documents, but not others?

How does this account for the existence of classified documents?
 
chipmunk stew said:
It was probably cleverly reflected off of a satellite mirror, so as to follow a perfect plumb line down to Ground Zero.

I just gave you an out, TS. Take it to Judy right away. She's waiting on the balcony. Go serenade her with this new idea. You can thank me later.
Click to expand...


TruthSeeker1234 said:
Mackey's objections mostly revolved around the weight of an orbiting power supply. We must consider the possibility that the power supply is earth based, and uses arrays of orbiting reflectors.
Click to expand...


Chipmunk Stew, Meet TruthSeeker1234. TruthSeeker1234, meet Chipmunk Stew. I'll just let you two fight it out, okay?



TruthSeeker1234 said:
I am open to other explanations for the cylindrical 9/11 holes, and the other strange phenonmena. Falling rubble? How could falling rubble cut so cleanly?
Click to expand...



No you aren't.


 
Horatius said:
I've seen people assert this before, but is it really true? Or is it true for some classes of documents, but not others?

How does this account for the existence of classified documents?
Click to expand...


What it means is that works of the U.S. government cannot be copyrighted, under U.S. copyright law. That doesn't mean there aren't other legal ways of preventing people from disseminating them, such as secret classifications and such.

Edit: also, the lack of copyright doesn't mean the government can't charge some kind of service fee for providing copies of the documents, such as the $13,600 or whatever it was that Christopher 7 was complaining he can't come up with. (One of the rationales for the government making more and more of its things available on the Internet is that it reduces the resources needed to disseminate them -- such as employee time, paper, ink, shipping costs, etc. -- which are the reason why there are service fees.)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom