Jesus created Sex

OK, this has been fun and all, but I think I am going to sum up my thoughts on this thread and, more importantly, on this poster in one question.

DJJ, have you ever had temporal lobe seizures?

I hate to use the term "textbook case", but this seems to be one. I will quote a passage from the chapter "God and the Limbic System" from the book listed in my sig. Any spelling errors are my own.



Ramachandran then goes on to describe a case study. One line of this description states:



It is just coincidence that I had read this book right before DJJ started posting, but I think this explains much of the behaviour we have seen on this and other threads.

I think that DJJ does display these symptoms and they are a good explanation for his posts and their content.

I have followed the postings of similar people on scl.skeptic over the years. Unfortunately, some seem to become very vindictive and try such things as e-mailing employers and eductational institutions to try and silence their critics.

I stand by my frequently expressed point that keeping them busy online keeps them off the streets and bothering people in person. This is a public service.
 
Allow me to suggest to you the answer why, the false skeptics HERE can not win an argument and can't post a positive THREAD anywhere.

The reason is simple, because their whole modus operandi is believing in nothing. Therefore they can have no background basis for anything, and hence every post is basically there first beginning steps into that realm. They have no intellectual weapons to stand on, as negation is not a weapon. It has no positive values.

They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally. They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.

Chaos and luck and chance just don't allow them to build websites that show luck and chance built them. Hence they are are weaponless and unarmed when it comes to any real discussion and so must revert back to their congregational name calling of any that dare differ with their nothingness.

That's my accessment of why false skeptics keep name calling, and labeling and making foolish comments in real discussions. They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.

Are you denying that I BELIEVE that you are incompetant?
Are you denying that I BELIEVE that you are trolling?
Are you denying that I BELIEVE that your numerology based religious "ideas" are a mockery of real Xtians?
Are you denying that I BELIEVE that you are here only to waste our time and try to raise your site numbers so you can get people to advertise on your sites?
Are you denying that I BELIEVE that you are almost as bad as Slyvia Brown and John Dedwards and Urine Gello and Allison Dubious (only not as bad because so far you just blather - I have no evidence that you rob people through their beliefs.)?
And those are just a few of the things I believe - they just aren't the ignorant claptrap you claim to.
 
Last edited:
So DJJ, who "knows biology", has a web page called "DoesthelordhaveaPenus"? Penus?
 
Allow me to suggest to you the answer why, the false skeptics HERE can not win an argument and can't post a positive THREAD anywhere.

The reason is simple, because their whole modus operandi is believing in nothing. Therefore they can have no background basis for anything, and hence every post is basically there first beginning steps into that realm. They have no intellectual weapons to stand on, as negation is not a weapon. It has no positive values.

They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally. They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.

Chaos and luck and chance just don't allow them to build websites that show luck and chance built them. Hence they are are weaponless and unarmed when it comes to any real discussion and so must revert back to their congregational name calling of any that dare differ with their nothingness.

That's my accessment of why false skeptics keep name calling, and labeling and making foolish comments in real discussions. They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.

Uarmed and crebability aren't bad! Could you either define them or use them in a meaningful sentence, please? I hate not knowing the proper definitions of words I haven't seen before! Thanks much, :D
 
He also mentions that in his "Phantoms in the Brain" which, by the way, is an excellent text.

Yup, that's the book in my sig. I agree, an excellent text and I often recommend it to people looking for a decent intro to neuroscience. I hope people on this thread notice this and keep it in mind when responding. You cannot have a rational debate with someone operating on a completely different plane of reality.
 
Now back to JESUS CREATED SEX.... for true skeptics would have to try and find an alternative to him creating it.

So give your best shot and state how sex created itself or by lucky chance was created, or tell me which of your gods created it and how.

Thanks, hoping to hear from ya !!!

Why do you say "Jesus created sex" rather than "God created sex"? I mean, in your bible it says "god created the heavens and the earth," not "Jesus created the heavens and the earth." What's up with that?
 
Why do you say "Jesus created sex" rather than "God created sex"? I mean, in your bible it says "god created the heavens and the earth," not "Jesus created the heavens and the earth." What's up with that?

Jesus is God, silly.

Except when he's not.

He's, like, not God. But he's God. But he's not God. And he's the Holy Ghost. But he's not. Yet he is. But he's... *slaps self*
 
Allow me to suggest to you the answer why, the false skeptics HERE can not win an argument and can't post a positive THREAD anywhere.



Incorrect. YOU have not won a single argument. This thread is YOUR thread. The responses you get are to your own stupid claims and just because they refute what you say only makes them seem negative from your perspective.



Davidjayjordan said:
The reason is simple, because their whole modus operandi is believing in nothing.



Incorrect. Believing in nothing that you believe in is the correct statement.



Davidjayjordan said:
Therefore they can have no background basis for anything, and hence every post is basically there first beginning steps into that realm.



Into what realm? Your realm of lunacy? Who would want to go there?



Davidjayjordan said:
They have no intellectual weapons to stand on, as negation is not a weapon. It has no positive values.



To the contrary, you were probably met here for the first time with people who were well versed in the various subjects in which you only dreamed that you were "world class" and when your obvious intellectual deficiencies were pointed out to you time after time, you retreated to the position that you were being besieged by a "mob" of negativism. You do not seem to understand the concept of a forum, that people post here independently of each other, that they are addressing each of your posts as individuals, one to one. Since you decided to bring your pseudo-research to a forum where a boatload of skeptics abide, you should have expected the multitude of similar responses that occurred..



Davidjayjordan said:
They can not refer to a website or much less their own website, because by their very lack of any orientation and being unable to connect up anything, they are forced to be null and void and weaponless mentally.



The website that you constantly refer to is well known on the Internet as a joke, and is listed as one of the Internet's Whacky Websites, but you seem to be proud of that legacy. Hope it's still there for your grandchildren to read. At least Papa can entertain them that way. The second half of the above statement applies only to you. You are the disoriented, the one who fails to connect with reality, the mentally weaponless. It may seem to be fun to make up a world in one's own mind but keep it in your own mind, because that is the only place it will be accepted.



Davidjayjordan said:
They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.



Incorrect again. You are not aware of any websites unless they express some sort of conspiratorial nature. What has been denied here is your own faulty logic and maths which has been shown to you over and over, and the truth of your shortcomings is what YOU deny. Your threads show no reason, no truthful logic, and no design by a god.



Davidjayjordan said:
Chaos and luck and chance just don't allow them to build websites that show luck and chance built them.



God built yours for you, didn't He? Whatever else you were trying to say in the above statement escapes me.



Davidjayjordan said:
Hence they are are weaponless and unarmed when it comes to any real discussion and so must revert back to their congregational name calling of any that dare differ with their nothingness.



The only person in your threads who is weaponless and mentally unarmed is David Jay Jordan. You've not discussed anything. You came here to teach and preach your views and when you were called on all of the stupid viewpoints you espouse, you reverted to bible verses to call people fools by proxy, because you don't have the guts to do it yourself.



Davidjayjordan said:
That's my accessment of why false skeptics keep name calling, and labeling and making foolish comments in real discussions. They are uarmed and so try mockery and foolishness, and hence lose all crebability, which is shown because they have no visable websites to call their own.



By your own definition, you have shown yourself to be the poster-boy for false skepticism. You were met with mockery only after it was obvious that you were never here to discuss anything. You continue to think that if someone has a website, then they are "somebody". You didn't have yours until 2001. What did you think of yourself before that? Big deal on the website business. So if one has a website with lots of porn or one advocating sex between minors and adults, just because it is a website, does that give one the "crebability" that you think they lack? You have been given ample counsel as to where your website essays contained errors, yet you refused to change them or take them down for repair. Instead you lashed out at others for being negative. They were only being truthful to you, but you were too full of yourself to realize that. The internet could be a more beautiful thing were it not for you and others like you who produce the garbage and falsehoods that have to be sifted by others. Why don't you take your musings to a purely mathematical forum where there may be Christians and non-Christians alike and see what kind of feedback you get? Take them to other forums and see how they play out there. Of course, it is expected that you will decide that you are being persecuted for your beliefs because you believe your god has given you some special insight that is not reserved for others and the persecution will only reinforce that type of paranoia.
 
They can NOT have websites or share any truths because they deny all truths and are afraid of truths that connect and show reason and logic and design.

So.... Skepticism keeps people from learning HTML or CSS and prevents them from getting web hosting?

Note the irony that this whack-job is posting on a skeptical forum which is linked to a skeptical WWW page.

Somebody better put DDJ back on his meds.
 
And whether you believe in His existence or not does not change the FACT of His existence nor the existence of sex even if you can;t see that either or aren't getting any either.

And whether you believe in His existence or not does not change the FACT of His non-existence nor the existence of sex even if you can;t see that either or aren't getting any either.

...

Now what?
 
Recipes? I can't think of any good ones, but I am sure others have one or two...

How's about one from my old buddy, Dr. Broadwell. It seems appropriate now.



[SIZE=+4]Cornbread Salad[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]I know this sounds like an odd dish, but it is really good. Everyone I have served it to has ask for the recipe. I make it with cornbread that has cheese and jalapeno peppers in it.[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]Dressing:[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1 package ranch style dressing mix[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]8 ounces sour cream[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1 cup mayonnaise[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1 recipe cornbread[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]2 (16-ounce) cans pinto beans, drained[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]3 cups shredded cheddar[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]3 large tomatoes, chopped[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1/2 cup chopped green bell pepper[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1/2 cup chopped green onions[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1/2 cup chopped chile peppers[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1 1/2 cups bacon pieces[/SIZE]
[SIZE=+1]1 (15-ounce) can corn, drained[/SIZE]

[SIZE=+1]Combine ranch dressing mix, sour cream and mayonnaise and set aside. Place 1/2 of the crumbled cornbread in the bottom of a large serving bowl. Top with 1 can of pinto beans. Follow with 1/2 of the cheese, tomatoes, bell peppers, green onions, chile peppers, bacon, corn, and dressing mixture. Repeat ending with the dressing mixture. Cover and chill at least 2 hours before serving.[/SIZE]
 
Last edited:
I think that DJJ does display these symptoms and they are a good explanation for his posts and their content.

I have followed the postings of similar people on scl.skeptic over the years. Unfortunately, some seem to become very vindictive and try such things as e-mailing employers and eductational institutions to try and silence their critics.

I stand by my frequently expressed point that keeping them busy online keeps them off the streets and bothering people in person. This is a public service.

Oh I wasn't trying to dissuade anyone from playing whack-a-troll, this was just my $0.02 as to what we are seeing here, and how I would be responding in the future. In other words, kittens and recipes!

I'm gonna have to try that Cornbread Salad. I love cornbread, I love salad.
 

Back
Top Bottom