Jesus created Sex

I was asked to check this unusually long thread along with another that was started by Davidjayjordon.

I find in this thread Davidjayhjordon confuses Jesus message of Love with the delivery/mechanics of it. He further confuses lobotomy with circumcision. The people who are non-responsive, placid lacking the desire to learn are not a result of circumcision but possibly lobotomy or some condition in the cerebral area.

It is only a crude joke that men often think with their private parts. So his thinking circumcision could affect their thinking is erroneous.
 
"Man is endowed with appetites and passions for the preservation of his life and the perpetuation of his kind. These, when held under proper subjection, contribute to his happiness and comfort; but when used for mere grati- fication, lead to misery and moral degradation."

David O. McKay
 
Janadele said:
"Man is endowed with appetites and passions for the preservation of his life and the perpetuation of his kind. These, when held under proper subjection, contribute to his happiness and comfort; but when used for mere grati- fication, lead to misery and moral degradation."

David O. McKay
Click to expand...
Controlling the passions of human beings is an effective means of controlling people. A measure of the degree of cult like behavior is the degree with which a religion restricts human drives including sex and eating.

 
Janadele said:
"Man is endowed with appetites and passions for the preservation of his life and the perpetuation of his kind. These, when held under proper subjection, contribute to his happiness and comfort; but when used for mere grati- fication, lead to misery and moral degradation."

David O. McKay
Click to expand...

He's wrong. It's great fun, I can recommend it.
 
justintime said:
I was asked to check this unusually long thread along with another that was started by Davidjayjordon.

I find in this thread Davidjayhjordon confuses Jesus message of Love with the delivery/mechanics of it. He further confuses lobotomy with circumcision. The people who are non-responsive, placid lacking the desire to learn are not a result of circumcision but possibly lobotomy or some condition in the cerebral area.

It is only a crude joke that men often think with their private parts. So his thinking circumcision could affect their thinking is erroneous.
Click to expand...
If you took away the flamboyant error from Mr. Jordan's utterances, you'd be left with little else.
 
I skimmed the OP, and am left feeling a little unsettled and a bit aroused. But at least some sects (heehee) of Christianity are turning away from the Puritanical prudishness of their forefathers. Then again, I don't think this is a new thing--weren't there sex cults with religious flavor back in the faraway history of the 1960s? I may be making this up.
 
justintime said:
I was asked to check this unusually long thread along with another that was started by Davidjayjordon.

I find in this thread Davidjayhjordon confuses Jesus message of Love with the delivery/mechanics of it. He further confuses lobotomy with circumcision. The people who are non-responsive, placid lacking the desire to learn are not a result of circumcision but possibly lobotomy or some condition in the cerebral area.

It is only a crude joke that men often think with their private parts. So his thinking circumcision could affect their thinking is erroneous.
Click to expand...


Congratulations--you've solved the thread!


:rolleyes:
 
Janadele said:
"Man is endowed with appetites and passions for the preservation of his life and the perpetuation of his kind. These, when held under proper subjection, contribute to his happiness and comfort; but when used for mere grati- fication, lead to misery and moral degradation."

David O. McKay
Click to expand...

What a load of nonsense. Sex for the sake of sex is fantastic, enjoyable and contributes to pair bonding in life long relationships. This McKay idiot had some severe repression issues of his own which he tried to justify by claiming his twisted, confined, restrictive notion of human sexuality is somehow divinely ordained.

I feel sorry for his wife. Men with an absurd "only for reproduction" attitude never really put much effort into satisfying their wives sexually unless they believe the debunked "up-suck" theory. I suspect the wives of religious men created the up-suck theory for that very reason.

I remember my single days. My 20's were a wild ride, in part because of cougars with deeply religious husbands. :p It's no wonder Utah Mormons were so willing to turn a blind eye when cuckolds to killed the seducers. Look up the 1857 murder of Parley P. Pratt for an example of how religious men who neglect their wives handle things when their wives turn to more attentive men.
 
justintime said:
I was asked to check this unusually long thread along with another that was started by Davidjayjordon.

I find in this thread Davidjayhjordon confuses Jesus message of Love with the delivery/mechanics of it. He further confuses lobotomy with circumcision. The people who are non-responsive, placid lacking the desire to learn are not a result of circumcision but possibly lobotomy or some condition in the cerebral area.

It is only a crude joke that men often think with their private parts. So his thinking circumcision could affect their thinking is erroneous.
Click to expand...

So, do you still think that the number of posts/views in your threads is confirmation of the quality of your arguments?
 
halleyscomet said:
What a load of nonsense. Sex for the sake of sex is fantastic, enjoyable and contributes to pair bonding in life long relationships. This McKay idiot had some severe repression issues of his own which he tried to justify by claiming his twisted, confined, restrictive notion of human sexuality is somehow divinely ordained.

I feel sorry for his wife. Men with an absurd "only for reproduction" attitude never really put much effort into satisfying their wives sexually unless they believe the debunked "up-suck" theory. I suspect the wives of religious men created the up-suck theory for that very reason.

I remember my single days. My 20's were a wild ride, in part because of cougars with deeply religious husbands. :p It's no wonder Utah Mormons were so willing to turn a blind eye when cuckolds to killed the seducers. Look up the 1857 murder of Parley P. Pratt for an example of how religious men who neglect their wives handle things when their wives turn to more attentive men.
Click to expand...

My guess is that Janadele does not really believe what she's saying here, or, like many religious people, is prepared to make redefinitions of common words as needed. The quotation above leaves out a rather important escape clause in church policy, at least where Mormons are concerned. What she and the quoted person are saying, of course, if taken literally, is that, among other things, a married couple must give up sex as soon as the wife is confirmed to be pregnant, as soon as the wife reaches menopause, and forever if one or the other is determined to be infertile. Now the Mormon church has a number of very restrictive rules about sex, including no oral sex, no masturbation, no homosexuality, and nothing at all outside of traditional holy matrimony, all of which could be argued themselves, but even that church does not actually, literally, practice the ridiculous notions expressed in the above quotation. Fudge the language all you want, but when it comes down to it, gratification ( presumably no longer "mere") is permitted if you're the right kind of couple with the right credentials. All the rest is just holier-than-thou blather.
 
bruto said:
My guess is that Janadele does not really believe what she's saying here, or, like many religious people, is prepared to make redefinitions of common words as needed. The quotation above leaves out a rather important escape clause in church policy, at least where Mormons are concerned. What she and the quoted person are saying, of course, if taken literally, is that, among other things, a married couple must give up sex as soon as the wife is confirmed to be pregnant, as soon as the wife reaches menopause, and forever if one or the other is determined to be infertile. Now the Mormon church has a number of very restrictive rules about sex, including no oral sex, no masturbation, no homosexuality, and nothing at all outside of traditional holy matrimony, all of which could be argued themselves, but even that church does not actually, literally, practice the ridiculous notions expressed in the above quotation. Fudge the language all you want, but when it comes down to it, gratification ( presumably no longer "mere") is permitted if you're the right kind of couple with the right credentials. All the rest is just holier-than-thou blather.
Click to expand...

That's why you need spares.
 
Did God also create gay sex or was that Satan?

If so, kudos on the whole lesbian thingie. Work of art.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom