Jesus created Sex

Hold on just a minute here folks. Is JD&C saying that he, a biblical literalist young Earth creationist believes that God, who created everything (including himself, presumably), actually created sex?

Well bugger me sideways with a motorbike! I sure as heck didn't expect that! :rolleyes:
 
I don't recall Mary complaining about god's technique in the Bible, but back then, she was probably supposed to close her eyes and think of Jerusalem.

That's very funny, Lisa. DDJ missed it, but very funny. But I suppose since it was supposed to be a virgin birth, he gave her all the work and pain without any of the fun.

Hold on just a minute here folks. Is JD&C saying that he, a biblical literalist young Earth creationist believes that God, who created everything (including himself, presumably), actually created sex?

Well bugger me sideways with a motorbike! I sure as heck didn't expect that! :rolleyes:

Well, I wonder if the bible covered motorbikes?

What about incest? It seems like God allowed Abraham to marry his sister. And "blessed" him with a son. Is that kind of sex ok?
 
It is not a fact if you only assert it to be so, David. Do you have any evidence?

Yes, it is I was a missionary for 15 years living totally by FAITH, with a wife and five kids. Jesus is real not imaginary, I put Him to the test and He works, His principles work. You can base your nothingness on nothingness, I prefer tried and tested and proven. I prefer real life. have I ever told you that before.

Now back to Jesus created sex... as obviously evolution could not have.
 
Actually posters, I have no one to answer, because your maturity level is just too low. I realise you think you are cute and your snide remarks shows your wit or intelligence to your congregation, but there is nothing there. No thought patterns worth responding to, maybe it is because you are so negative you have no sex life, and therefore aren;t concerned who made sexuality.

Anyway for the sake of others, who may be interested in how we reproduce, and who made sex.... the answer is Jesus.

But evolutionists do proceed to tell us how evolution through millions of mistakes simultaneously developed males and then females or vice versa, to have all the attributes and successful mating organisms, to reproduce.

I await the proofs of your claims.

But then again you usually say you know nothing and therefore have to prove nothing as nothing is your belief.

No wonder you can't attract anyone from the opposite sex, you have to have something to be attractive.
 
Yes, it is I was a missionary for 15 years living totally by FAITH, with a wife and five kids. Jesus is real not imaginary, I put Him to the test and He works, His principles work. You can base your nothingness on nothingness, I prefer tried and tested and proven. I prefer real life. have I ever told you that before.

So you don't have any evidence then? If you don't, why don't you admit it? Because what you've posted here is not evidence, but assertion. You assert that you are correct, but you do not provide any evidence that suggests that you actually are.

Now back to Jesus created sex... as obviously evolution could not have.

Except that it has provided a perfectly good mechanism for the development of two sexes. And you would know that if you had studied evolution.

Have you studied evolution, David?
 
Actually posters, I have no one to answer, because your maturity level is just too low. I realise you think you are cute and your snide remarks shows your wit or intelligence to your congregation, but there is nothing there.

We first answered your posts seriously, David. But you have yet to respond to a very large number of honest questions. For example, mine on biology, or Terry's on the earth-moon distance. As long as you continue to ignore them, and spout the same old clap trap as if you were right, then we will not take you seriously.

No thought patterns worth responding to, maybe it is because you are so negative you have no sex life, and therefore aren;t concerned who made sexuality.

:rolleyes:

How do you know this, David? You claim we "have no sex life". How, exactly, do you know this? Evidence would be nice. You can choose me, if you like. Please provide evidence that I have no sex life.

Anyway for the sake of others, who may be interested in how we reproduce, and who made sex.... the answer is Jesus.

False dichotomy. No-one "made sex", David, "sex" developed.

But evolutionists do proceed to tell us how evolution through millions of mistakes simultaneously developed males and then females or vice versa, to have all the attributes and successful mating organisms, to reproduce.

Strawman. This is not what evolution claims at all, David. You would know this if you had studied evolution. Have you studied evolution, David?

I await the proofs of your claims.

That is impossible, since no "evolutionist" has ever claimed what you think they have.

But then again you usually say you know nothing and therefore have to prove nothing as nothing is your belief.

You are the one who has showed no knowledge.

No wonder you can't attract anyone from the opposite sex, you have to have something to be attractive.

Please provide evidence that I have no sex life.
 
Except that it has provided a perfectly good mechanism for the development of two sexes. And you would know that if you had studied evolution.

Have you studied evolution, David?

Yes, they attempted to FORCE evolution on me in UNIVERSITY, but it made no sense, and they had no answers and the professor got rather upset and so tried to fail me, but I knew my biology and could explain it competantly to the dean, and so I passed over the complaint of the professor who was not used to questions as he had no answers.

I hate force and intimidation, and believing in luck and chance and making it required reading like pro-suicide.

But the rest of the students for the most part, yielded to the pressure, as they wanted jobs as biologists, and so HAD to believe the dogmas presently to them by the high priest of evolution. And it was all by FAITH, they had no evidence...and to it is absolutely ludicrous to even consider sex of male and females simultaneously developed in unity to make sexual union productive. Absolutely ludicrous and downright insane... But when people are forced to believe, they many times just yield to their masters and controllers.
 
Yes, they attempted to FORCE evolution on me in UNIVERSITY, but it made no sense, and they had no answers and the professor got rather upset and so tried to fail me, but I knew my biology and could explain it competantly to the dean, and so I passed over the complaint of the professor who was not used to questions as he had no answers.

Interesting. What exactly was it that made no sense and you explained to the Dean (convenient that the Dean knew biology too!)?
 
Why do you say "Jesus created sex" rather than "God created sex"? I mean, in your bible it says "god created the heavens and the earth," not "Jesus created the heavens and the earth." What's up with that?

God is a generic term, as even we are gods in a sense...... small g, if we receive HIM.



Jhn 10:35 If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken;

The Word of God is Jesus, he is the living Word not just the written word which can be evaded.

He is the Great I AM of the Old testament, and if you like he is the One Moses saw on the Mount, and who returned to be with Jesus on the Mount of transfiguration.

Jesus was God and is God..and the three are ONE. he is the EVERLASTING FATHER as scriptures say...



Isa 9:6For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
 
Yes, they attempted to FORCE evolution on me in UNIVERSITY, but it made no sense, and they had no answers and the professor got rather upset and so tried to fail me, but I knew my biology and could explain it competantly to the dean, and so I passed over the complaint of the professor who was not used to questions as he had no answers.

And what school was this? The University Of Fairies, Leprechauns, and Magical Ponies?

I hate force and intimidation, and believing in luck and chance and making it required reading like pro-suicide.

Could you be a little more incoherent please?

But the rest of the students for the most part, yielded to the pressure, as they wanted jobs as biologists, and so HAD to believe the dogmas presently to them by the high priest of evolution. And it was all by FAITH, they had no evidence...and to it is absolutely ludicrous to even consider sex of male and females simultaneously developed in unity to make sexual union productive. Absolutely ludicrous and downright insane... But when people are forced to believe, they many times just yield to their masters and controllers.

So the last two centuries of accumulated data in biology, genetics, paleontology, anthropology and other disciplines is just a conspiracy by those evil scientists to force college kids become biologists, eh? Did they also assassinate Kennedy too and blow up the WTC?

I dare you to make less sense.
 
It's no use, Zep. The heckling of the trolls is a favorite pass time of many here. Now that David has completely showed his hand, he is entitiled to whatever action he gets for the duration of his stay.
I don't give a monkey's dangly bits what treatment he receives at the hands of others here. Really I don't. I admit I've had a bat of his head a few times. Not that it made any difference, of course.

My point is that he is getting free publicity and Google-cred for himself just by getting responded to. We could all post irrelevant nonsense in our native languages AND Ancient Greek (believe me, I've considered this!), and that result would still be the same. So I am encouraging people here NOT to encourage him there.

Either that, or he has cornered the market on pseudoephedrine derivatives...

Where's pillory when you need him?
 
But evolutionists do proceed to tell us how evolution through millions of mistakes simultaneously developed males and then females or vice versa, to have all the attributes and successful mating organisms, to reproduce.

I await the proofs of your claims.

Some species even today are known as hermaphrodites, sometimes taking the role of either sex. The evolutionary implication is a simple one - different sexes impart a survival trait that was of benefit. (Probably something to do with genetic diversity.)

So you are jumping to a false conclusion, and one of ignorance, that evolution requires simultaneous development of sex. This is just a misconception on your part, not a flaw of science.
 
Yes, they attempted to FORCE evolution on me in UNIVERSITY, but it made no sense, and they had no answers and the professor got rather upset and so tried to fail me, but I knew my biology and could explain it competantly to the dean, and so I passed over the complaint of the professor who was not used to questions as he had no answers.

I think you are lying. Please name the establishment where this happened.

I hate force and intimidation, and believing in luck and chance and making it required reading like pro-suicide.

You do not understand evolution if you think it is "just luck and chance".

And what do you mean by "pro-suicide"?

But the rest of the students for the most part, yielded to the pressure, as they wanted jobs as biologists, and so HAD to believe the dogmas presently to them by the high priest of evolution. And it was all by FAITH, they had no evidence...and to it is absolutely ludicrous to even consider sex of male and females simultaneously developed in unity to make sexual union productive. Absolutely ludicrous and downright insane... But when people are forced to believe, they many times just yield to their masters and controllers.

Since you clearly do not understand evolution in the slightest, why should we take anything you have to say on the subject seriously?
 

Back
Top Bottom