How Loony are the Loons?

RemoveBush said:
"Kiwiwriter - So the New World Order has no problem committing mass murder, forgery, and fraud...but they're petrified of a personal injury lawyer with an asbestos lawsuit."

Of course not, but if they can obtain their goals by taking a quick approach to obtaining their goals, sure. Oh and by the way..... I guess you believe the NWO stuff, because YOU sure bring it up in almost every post you write. I have NOT brought it up once, so who is the PARANOID individual?

"Kiwiwriter - Killing thousands of people, faking piles of evidence, bribing and threatening thousands of investigators, soldiers, cops, doctors, lab technicians, lawyers, air traffic controllers, staging fake investigation boards, creating fake air crash sites, manufacturing evidence...no problem."

You really, really, have such a simple mind don't you? "bribing and threatening thousands of investigators", they would only need to PREVENT evidence falling into their hands, which was done. Nothing like being idiotic..... Just about everything you just said is so rediculous that all I am going to say is that YOU obviously have not EVER served in the millitary. When things are compartamentalized, the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. This does not mean that the right hand is lying about the information, it just means that they don't have all the information.

"Kiwiwriter - But a third-rate ambulance chaser with a personal-injury suit...that they're afraid of.

Just making sure I have you straight on this."

Everything you just stated is your WARPED, uneducated, unintelligent babling that comes from people like you. I certainly am glad that you have never served, as I am guessing by your mental abilities, because if you had you would have not thought outside the box about how the enemy might attack you and your fellow soldiers. You do know that they lowered the standards for the military now, so they would probably accept someone who is mentally challenged? Might be something you should look into.
Click to expand...


Are you stupid??? :confused: You really think someone reads your
B***◊◊◊◊ if you´re not able to quote properly? :confused:
 
T.A.M. said:
I agree, and there is no doubt he is now doing it for simple provocation. I will attempt to use the proper quote function in future. I usually just use the QUOTE Tags, but this does not id the quoted person.

TAM
Click to expand...

This does point out something 28K and RB are good for. I've learned more about some of the forum features. RB has taught me (indirectly) about the multi-quote function and spell check. 28K taught me about the "ignore" feature.

Thanks, Precious and Macaroon!
 
RemoveBush said:
"stateofgrace - Wow, thanks for the answer, seek help pal,seriously."

Right after you pal. I live in the real world, but it appears you live in some fantasy land that what ever the high ups tell you is fact and you follow blindly. Thank god there are some people that are still true Americans and are standing up against this rogue govenrment to protect what is left of America.

Don't worry, in just a few years the truth will be smacking you in the face of all the lies that the government has told you that you will need a sump pump in your basement to keep from drowning in your basement from the tears.
Click to expand...

Oliver said:
Are you stupid??? :confused: You really think someone reads your
B***◊◊◊◊ if you´re not able to quote properly? :confused:
Click to expand...

JimBenArm said:
This does point out something 28K and RB are good for. I've learned more about some of the forum features. RB has taught me (indirectly) about the multi-quote function and spell check. 28K taught me about the "ignore" feature.

Thanks, Precious and Macaroon!
Click to expand...


Yes, the above was done by using the multiquote function twice, then the regular quote function for the last quote...sweet feature.

TAM:)
 
RemoveBush said:
"stateofgrace - Wow, thanks for the answer, seek help pal,seriously."

Right after you pal. I live in the real world, but it appears you live in some fantasy land that what ever the high ups tell you is fact and you follow blindly. Thank god there are some people that are still true Americans and are standing up against this rogue govenrment to protect what is left of America.

Don't worry, in just a few years the truth will be smacking you in the face of all the lies that the government has told you that you will need a sump pump in your basement to keep from drowning in your basement from the tears.
Click to expand...

(insert wanker smilie here)

btw, BrainsRemoved, how does this correlate to us skeptics from abroad? Why would we give a damn about what the US Government is telling, let alone believe it? We deal with facts, not rubbish.
 
Bell said:
(insert wanker smilie here)

btw, BrainsRemoved, how does this correlate to us skeptics from abroad? Why would we give a damn about what the US Government is telling, let alone believe it? We deal with facts, not rubbish.
Click to expand...

But Bell, you're being unAmerican!

Dern foreigners!

Gonna ship you off to the Netherlands, you keep this up!
 
RemoveBush said:
They did in fact reduce the REQUIREMENTS to allow 3rd party testing for an FCC 1st Class equivilent license. Hence my statement of having an "EQUIVILENT" FCC license.
Click to expand...
Ah! Now I get it! Those cuddly and generous Feddies! Test for this - we'll give ya that!

Is this kind of like Judy Who Wood getting a degree in Dental Crownery but it actually counts as an EQUIVENT degree in Billiards?

Would you mind posting your EQUIVENT Driver's License so we can verify who you really are?
 
"apathoid - As Conspirator noted, he did say "equivalent" license. I have absolutely no idea what an FCC 1st class equivalent license is or how you might get one. The FCC lists these as available licenses."

I guess the state of californial knows what it means, and just because you don't know something does not mean that it is not factual or possible:

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache...t+license+n.a.b.e.r&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=12
"Possession of at least ONE valid certificate or license certified by the Department of General Services, Telecommunications Division, and industry accepted, qualifying the person to perform transmitter installation, operation, maintenance, and repair duties. Those certificates and licenses currently certified by the Telecommunications Division for meeting this qualification are:

1.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]FCC General Radiotelephone Operator License.
2.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]FCC 1st Class or 2nd Class Radiotelegraph Operator’s Certificate.
3.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]NABER Two-Way Radio Technician Certificate.
4.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]APCO Two Way Radio Technician Certificate.
5.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]NARTE Technician or Engineer Certificate with Applicable Job Specifications Endorsement (s).
6.[FONT=&quot] [/FONT]DGS, Telecommunications Division, Technician Certification Program."


Or mabye this?
http://www.actransit.org/pdf/job_classes/job_class_222.pdf
"License/Certification: Must possess and maintain a current FCC Second Class or General Radio Telephone
license OR a NABER (National Association of Business and Education Radio) OR an APCO (Associated Public
Safety Communications Offices) certificate . Must possess and maintain a valid California Class C Driver’s
License and meet the District’s driving standards."
 
RemoveBush said:
"apathoid - As Conspirator noted, he did say "equivalent" license. I have absolutely no idea what an FCC 1st class equivalent license is or how you might get one. The FCC lists these as available licenses."

I guess the state of californial knows what it means, and just because you don't know something does not mean that it is not factual or possible:

http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache...t+license+n.a.b.e.r&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=12
"Possession of at least ONE valid certificate or license certified by the Department of General Services, Telecommunications Division, and industry accepted, qualifying the person to perform transmitter installation, operation, maintenance, and repair duties. Those certificates and licenses currently certified by the Telecommunications Division for meeting this qualification are:

1.FCC General Radiotelephone Operator License.
2.FCC 1st Class or 2nd Class Radiotelegraph Operator’s Certificate.
3.NABER Two-Way Radio Technician Certificate.
4.APCO Two Way Radio Technician Certificate.
5.NARTE Technician or Engineer Certificate with Applicable Job Specifications Endorsement (s).
6.DGS, Telecommunications Division, Technician Certification Program."


Or mabye this?
http://www.actransit.org/pdf/job_classes/job_class_222.pdf
"License/Certification: Must possess and maintain a current FCC Second Class or General Radio Telephone
license OR a NABER (National Association of Business and Education Radio) OR an APCO (Associated Public
Safety Communications Offices) certificate . Must possess and maintain a valid California Class C Driver’s
License and meet the District’s driving standards."
Click to expand...

Earth to RemoveBush, earth to RemoveBush ... do you copy me?
 
Oliver said:
Earth to RemoveBush, earth to RemoveBush ... do you copy me?
Click to expand...

Ground control to major tom
Ground control to major tom
Take your protein pills and put your helmet on

Ground control to major tom
Commencing countdown, engines on
Check ignition and may gods love be with you

Ten, nine, eight, seven, six, five,
Four, three, two, one, liftoff

This is ground control to major tom
Youve really made the grade
And the papers want to know whose shirts you wear
Now its time to leave the capsule if you dare

This is major tom to ground control
Im stepping through the door
And Im floating in a most peculiar way
And the stars look very different today

For here
Am I sitting in a tin can
Far above the world
Planet earth is blue
And theres nothing I can do

Though Im past one hundred thousand miles
Im feeling very still
And I think my spaceship knows which way to go
Tell me wife I love her very much she knows

Ground control to major tom
Your circuits dead, theres something wrong
Can you hear me, major tom?
Can you hear me, major tom?
Can you hear me, major tom?
Can you....

Here am I floating round my tin can
Far above the moon
Planet earth is blue
And theres nothing I can do.
 
RemoveBush said:
"stateofgrace - Really?


http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
"Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sect. of Treasury under Pres. Reagan
... I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility."





I have sent Paul Craig Roberts three e-mails pointing out to him that the truth is, he really doesn't know ANY qualified engineers or scientists who lend credence to the conspiracy liars' myth. He hasn't responded.
Click to expand...
 
Bwaaah! This guys ignorance is the pest. :piangry:

ETA: Guess i have to make new Badges...
 
RemoveBush said:
I stated "hermetically sealed" in an innapropriate manner. The towers were in fact SELF SEALING for the most part. They had dampers that would not allow smoke to travel throughout the shafts.

Unlike you people, I can in fact admit when I state something that is incorrect.
Click to expand...

It is good that you have admitted, after several hundreds of posts and numerous reminders, that you were wrong about the buildings being "hermetically sealed".

It is incorrect, however, to state that the towers were "self sealing" as you have now stated, and I would invite you to provide evidence to substantiate that claim. I will even help you. Go back and look at the posts made by Crungy about this issue earlier in this thread. Also, keep in mind that there is a vast difference between utility shafts and elevator shafts. And then please provide evidence to support your claim about the buildings being "self-sealing".

It is also incorrect to insinuate that skeptics do not admit to being wrong. We here will always admit to an error when one is pointed out or proven or self-discovered.

I know... Your gonna make some rediculous claim of some kind, I am just not sure what it will be from your warped mind.
Click to expand...

Excuse me? What's with the insults? You've no basis for them, and I really think that you would be further ahead if you didn't make gratuitous insults and instead tried to actually engage in discussion.

The simple reason for not answering is because I am answering as I go, so if I forget to answer something means NOTHING! You see..... There are how many of you and how many of me? I cannot keep up with with finding the information you ask for with the links I have and continuing to remember what you ask.
Click to expand...

I can certainly understand that there are many questions for you to answer here, given that you have raised so many unrelated topics all over the map. In fact, it is always a good idea in discussions to stick to one topic at a time so that such overloads do not occur, and so that the discussion actually stays focussed. However, if you raise numerous topics, and do not support your claims with evidence, it is almost inevitable that you will soon be overwhelmed with having to follow up on the promises you make.

Perhaps in future, you can utilize proper debate decorum and save yourself from such perils and pitfalls.

Of course this will go as another way to attack me, but what would be new for you people with all the double standards and all.
Click to expand...

Nobody here will attack you for admitting that you were wrong. As I said above, skeptics here will always admit to an error when one is pointed out or proven or self-discovered.
 
The Clock is Ticking

Is this guy really going to get off the hook about the possibility of remote-controlled aircraft hitting the Twin Towers and the Pentagon? Can we take a short break from the vital issue of the quote button and pin him down on this?
 
RemoveBush said:
"Just to rub some salt in here:

Just think, RemovedBrain. A lowly electrical tech can figure out how to use the quote function. Why can't an engineer of such supreme intelligence as yourself not do the same?

Just asking questions!"

I can.... It's just simpler to copy the comment and paste it than going through all the other crap I have to for the "quote".

If its that hard for you... Here is a clue.... Just look for " in the beging and the end of what is being quoted.... This has been used for HUNDREDS of years and it has worked just fine all that time!
Click to expand...

It's onlyhard on the end!
 
You really hate me, don't you?

RemoveBush said:
"Kiwiwriter - So the New World Order has no problem committing mass murder, forgery, and fraud...but they're petrified of a personal injury lawyer with an asbestos lawsuit."

Of course not, but if they can obtain their goals by taking a quick approach to obtaining their goals, sure. Oh and by the way..... I guess you believe the NWO stuff, because YOU sure bring it up in almost every post you write. I have NOT brought it up once, so who is the PARANOID individual?

"Kiwiwriter - Killing thousands of people, faking piles of evidence, bribing and threatening thousands of investigators, soldiers, cops, doctors, lab technicians, lawyers, air traffic controllers, staging fake investigation boards, creating fake air crash sites, manufacturing evidence...no problem."

You really, really, have such a simple mind don't you? "bribing and threatening thousands of investigators", they would only need to PREVENT evidence falling into their hands, which was done. Nothing like being idiotic..... Just about everything you just said is so rediculous that all I am going to say is that YOU obviously have not EVER served in the millitary. When things are compartamentalized, the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing. This does not mean that the right hand is lying about the information, it just means that they don't have all the information.

"Kiwiwriter - But a third-rate ambulance chaser with a personal-injury suit...that they're afraid of.

Just making sure I have you straight on this."

Everything you just stated is your WARPED, uneducated, unintelligent babling that comes from people like you. I certainly am glad that you have never served, as I am guessing by your mental abilities, because if you had you would have not thought outside the box about how the enemy might attack you and your fellow soldiers. You do know that they lowered the standards for the military now, so they would probably accept someone who is mentally challenged? Might be something you should look into.
Click to expand...

Are you so absolutely certain I have never served in the military? Fill this forum with your vast and documented knowledge of my life.

I'm as obligated to answer that question as you are about presenting proof that no planes hit the World Trade Center, or that the planes were flying gas chambers for their passengers, or that the World Trade Center was demolished for an insurance fraud connected with its housing code violations.

Nothing but ad hominem attacks on me. Interesting.

Do your research.

Now, let's see...the Bush administration take the quick approach to achieving their goals. Seems that doing things in an all-fired hurry would result in a lot of things going wrong. Not a good way to do a cover-up. But wasn't "North Woods" dreamed up in 1961, and 9/11 was merely the culmination of a 44-year plan?

And you say they "PREVENTED" the evidence from being given to the investigators. Sounds like those investigators aren't very good at their chosen profession.
 
"Kiwiwriter - He just admitted that he doesn't have the truth or the answers. He just doesn't like the "official story.""

WRONG!!! I said that I don't know the truth, because the TRUTH has not been presented. Some of it, but not all. Once again, you people do just what you CLAIM the "truthers" do. The problem is that you slander and attack people, where the truthers simply point out the fallacies in the Official Version.

"Kiwiwriter - And he says the World Trade Center was about to be condemned by building inspectors, for, among other things, its "tasteless paint job."

Tasteless paint job?"

Please by all means show me where I said that because I just did a search and NOWHERE was it turned up, which is why I REPORTED YOU for SLANDER.

"Kiwiwriter - He says "I don't know what the true truth is."

WRONG! I said I don't know what the truth is and neither do you! How about providing the ENTIRE quote? "I don't know what the TRUE truth is, and I know YOU don't. If you say you do then you are LYING! Not even the members of Congress truely know the truth, why do you think so many of them have questions and doubt the official story?"

"Kiwiwriter - Try studying the subject from better sources than conspiracy theory websites, and more importantly, don't go bellowing at other people about what happened until you do know the truth! All you're doing is revealing your ignorance and providing us with hilarity."

Actually, you people are the ones who are "bellowing at other people" and have been since the begining. Why don't you take your own advice? If the Senate members don't know the "truth", I am 100% sure you don't know the TRUTH! If you say otherwise, you are lying. I don't expect you to grasp this simple LITTLE FACT, as you seem to gloss over things like this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom