How Loony are the Loons?

"LashL - See how easy it is?

Even a troofer can do it."

I wonder if I should report you because that quote does not indicate that it was from me. After all you are breaking the Members Terms.

I'll just think about that.

Ahem. What are you on about? My post clearly identified you and your post to which I was responding. Sheesh.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2212270&postcount=842

Moreover, I was attempting to assist you by giving you a brief and easy lesson on using the quote function.

And I'm still waiting for your "evidence" about the towers being "hermetically sealed" - remember, that evidence that you promised shortly after your entrance here, about 900 posts ago?
 
Last edited:
"stateofgrace - Really?

Please post the ones that agree that there were preplanted explosives inside the Towers.
Please post the ones that also agree that Flight 77 did not hit the Pentagon.
Then post the ones that also agree Flight 93 was shot down.
Then post the ones that also think Al Quada is not real and did not attack the
USA.
Then finally post the ones that also agree WTC 7 was demolished.

Do they all agree with your insanity or are you simply hoping they all will?"

Here you go...
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050917&articleId=965

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
"Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under President Bush
June 13, 2005, Washington Times/ UPI

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20050613-102755-6408r.htm or click here
A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11."

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
"Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sect. of Treasury under Pres. Reagan
... I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility."



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
Dr. Robert Bowman: the impossibility of the official government story


http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm

"Former Reagan Deputy and Colonel Says 9/11 "Dog That Doesn't Hunt"
Col. Ronald D. Ray asks why half a trillion defense budget couldn't protect Pentagon, astounded at "conspiracy theory" put out by government ... The Colonel detailed historical examples of the use of false flag operations carried out by the US government, in particular Israel's attempted sinking of the USS Liberty, which LBJ allowed to happen in an effort to blame Egypt and kickstart a war."​

I can go on and on and on, but you will deny each and every one! Maybe your research is not as good as you believe?


Each of these individuals claim that one or several things about the governments story is a farce. Many come right out and say it was an inside job.


CHECK and MATE!
 
"Here you go...
http://www.lewrockwell.com/reynolds/reynolds12.html

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20050917&articleId=965

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911

"Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under President Bush

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11."

http://www.wanttoknow.info/050908insidejob911
"Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Sect. of Treasury under Pres. Reagan
... I know many qualified engineers and scientists have said the WTC collapsed from explosives. In fact, if you look at the manner in which it fell, you have to give their conclusions credibility."



http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6900065571556128674
Dr. Robert Bowman: the impossibility of the official government story


http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2006/010706doesnthunt.htm


"Former Reagan Deputy and Colonel Says 9/11 "Dog That Doesn't Hunt"

Col. Ronald D. Ray asks why half a trillion defense budget couldn't protect Pentagon, astounded at "conspiracy theory" put out by government ... The Colonel detailed historical examples of the use of false flag operations carried out by the US government, in particular Israel's attempted sinking of the USS Liberty, which LBJ allowed to happen in an effort to blame Egypt and kickstart a war."​

I can go on and on and on, but you will deny each and every one! Maybe your research is not as good as you believe?


Each of these individuals claim that one or several things about the governments story is a farce. Many come right out and say it was an inside job.


CHECK and MATE!

"Morgan Reynolds, Former Chief Economist under President Bush
June 13, 2005, Washington Times/ UPI


Beam weapon; nut case! crazy loon! dumb as dirt! (no planes too, wow 100 percent loon!!!)

You lost this one RB the no quote king! Lost again!

Your USS Liberty was attacked by Israel; not false, it happened, too bad, no good stuff there.

And your big fact filled one """Dr. Robert Bowman: the impossibility of the official government story"""

But Dr Bowman does not present FACTS (lost again)

Do you always loose your arguments so quickly and soundly?

You picked the loony ones! Good job, we can use you to pick loons out of a list of nut cases.

You are the best loon picker I have seen.
 
When someone mentions Morgan Reynolds.....yep, they are officially debunked.

Case closed.
 
"Regnad Kcin - Groody gumdrops. Funny how the FCC abolished the First and Third Class licenses in the 1980s."

REALLY????

Then I guess you better tell the FCC that they are committing FRUAD!
http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/t3.html

"The Third Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate is issued for a period of five (5) years." Notice how NOW you must re-apply for the license. If a person still holds an original license, such as myself, then this one is always valid until it is lost (as it must be displayed at the operation at all times).

They did in fact reduce the REQUIREMENTS to allow 3rd party testing for an FCC 1st Class equivilent license. Hence my statement of having an "EQUIVILENT" FCC license.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel with you people.
 
"Regnad Kcin - Groody gumdrops. Funny how the FCC abolished the First and Third Class licenses in the 1980s."

REALLY????

Then I guess you better tell the FCC that they are committing FRUAD!
http://wireless.fcc.gov/commoperators/t3.html

"The Third Class Radiotelegraph Operator's Certificate is issued for a period of five (5) years." Notice how NOW you must re-apply for the license. If a person still holds an original license, such as myself, then this one is always valid until it is lost (as it must be displayed at the operation at all times).

They did in fact reduce the REQUIREMENTS to allow 3rd party testing for an FCC 1st Class equivilent license. Hence my statement of having an "EQUIVILENT" FCC license.

It's like shooting fish in a barrel with you people.

Hello "RemoveBush", :)

Do you see this message? :confused:
 
"Kiwiwriter - Screaming and yelling, hurling ad hominem attacks, and lousy grammar are not going to win you any adherents. Neither are your theories. They gassed all the passengers in the planes? It took the Feds a few minutes of scanning passenger lists to know who to make fake phone calls to and what to say? Factions within the government that are running drug wars?"

How about you pull your head out from that dark space for once and think?

"Kiwiwriter - I must say, your knowledge of my life, career, and education are about on the same level as your understanding of politics and the events of 9/11. I suggest you do more legwork on all of them, besides rereading conspiracy web pages."

As is you with mine! I get out plenty and I am very versed in researching things. Just because you don't like something does not make it wrong. What school did you go to, the school of blinders?

"Kiwiwriter - And I also did some reflection on the USS Liberty issue...I don't see any "false flag" attack in that. The ship was bombed by Israeli warships and planes, flying the flag (or insignia) of the Israeli Defense Forces, manned by Israeli airmen and sailors, in uniform of their service, citizens of their nation, paid by their nation, acting on the orders of their government (admittedly wrong and stupid orders). Israelis bombed Americans. How is that a "false flag" attack?"

Then I guess you missed the places that speaks of the commander of the ship in fact stating that LBJ told him he wanted that ship at the bottom of the ocean? Oh and brainiac...... A "false flag" does not need to be perfromed 100% by your own. It can be performed by someone else on your behalf. Though the TERM was originally called that because in the early days this is what would happen. However, in the last 50 years or more, a "false flag" has become a term used to signify a misrepresentation of an attack. Namely, blaming someone else when it was yourself or you hired someone else to do the job. Try visiting the library sometime, if your mom will let you out of the basement that is.

"Kiwiwriter - A "false flag" attack would be Americans in Israeli uniforms and aircraft bombing an American ship. So this does not apply."

See my previous comment, and to aid in your learning ability here is link for you to study.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own."

"Kiwiwriter - Do try and learn to use the quote key, the English language, research tools that do not rely on web pages operated by neo-Nazi UFO nutters, and stop screaming hysterically. You're addressing folks who are not impressed by screaming and insults. Unlike you, we do get out of our basement occasionally."

Don't need to..... Oh, and so now you are the one who determines what is and what is not acceptable material? Oh great and mindless one, please tell me what is acceptable information???? Only that which supports your "conspiracy theory"?
 
"Kiwiwriter - Screaming and yelling, hurling ad hominem attacks, and lousy grammar are not going to win you any adherents. Neither are your theories. They gassed all the passengers in the planes? It took the Feds a few minutes of scanning passenger lists to know who to make fake phone calls to and what to say? Factions within the government that are running drug wars?"

How about you pull your head out from that dark space for once and think?

"Kiwiwriter - I must say, your knowledge of my life, career, and education are about on the same level as your understanding of politics and the events of 9/11. I suggest you do more legwork on all of them, besides rereading conspiracy web pages."

As is you with mine! I get out plenty and I am very versed in researching things. Just because you don't like something does not make it wrong. What school did you go to, the school of blinders?

"Kiwiwriter - And I also did some reflection on the USS Liberty issue...I don't see any "false flag" attack in that. The ship was bombed by Israeli warships and planes, flying the flag (or insignia) of the Israeli Defense Forces, manned by Israeli airmen and sailors, in uniform of their service, citizens of their nation, paid by their nation, acting on the orders of their government (admittedly wrong and stupid orders). Israelis bombed Americans. How is that a "false flag" attack?"

Then I guess you missed the places that speaks of the commander of the ship in fact stating that LBJ told him he wanted that ship at the bottom of the ocean? Oh and brainiac...... A "false flag" does not need to be perfromed 100% by your own. It can be performed by someone else on your behalf. Though the TERM was originally called that because in the early days this is what would happen. However, in the last 50 years or more, a "false flag" has become a term used to signify a misrepresentation of an attack. Namely, blaming someone else when it was yourself or you hired someone else to do the job. Try visiting the library sometime, if your mom will let you out of the basement that is.

"Kiwiwriter - A "false flag" attack would be Americans in Israeli uniforms and aircraft bombing an American ship. So this does not apply."

See my previous comment, and to aid in your learning ability here is link for you to study.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own."

"Kiwiwriter - Do try and learn to use the quote key, the English language, research tools that do not rely on web pages operated by neo-Nazi UFO nutters, and stop screaming hysterically. You're addressing folks who are not impressed by screaming and insults. Unlike you, we do get out of our basement occasionally."

Don't need to..... Oh, and so now you are the one who determines what is and what is not acceptable material? Oh great and mindless one, please tell me what is acceptable information???? Only that which supports your "conspiracy theory"?

Precious! Calm down! You know you get all cranky when you get so worked up. I know they asked hard questions that you can't answer, but it's not their fault you can't do research!

Maybe when you get back to school, you can ask one of the other students to help you. I'm sure one of them has an older sibling in middle school.

Now go take a nap, and maybe you'll get a special treat for supper!

Sleep well, Precious!
 
"Kiwiwriter - Screaming and yelling, hurling ad hominem attacks, and lousy grammar are not going to win you any adherents. Neither are your theories. They gassed all the passengers in the planes? It took the Feds a few minutes of scanning passenger lists to know who to make fake phone calls to and what to say? Factions within the government that are running drug wars?"

How about you pull your head out from that dark space for once and think?

No, I think you just proved my point...you didn't answer my questions, you simply hurled an ad hominem attack.

"Kiwiwriter - I must say, your knowledge of my life, career, and education are about on the same level as your understanding of politics and the events of 9/11. I suggest you do more legwork on all of them, besides rereading conspiracy web pages."

As is you with mine! I get out plenty and I am very versed in researching things. Just because you don't like something does not make it wrong. What school did you go to, the school of blinders?

See above.

"Kiwiwriter - And I also did some reflection on the USS Liberty issue...I don't see any "false flag" attack in that. The ship was bombed by Israeli warships and planes, flying the flag (or insignia) of the Israeli Defense Forces, manned by Israeli airmen and sailors, in uniform of their service, citizens of their nation, paid by their nation, acting on the orders of their government (admittedly wrong and stupid orders). Israelis bombed Americans. How is that a "false flag" attack?"

Then I guess you missed the places that speaks of the commander of the ship in fact stating that LBJ told him he wanted that ship at the bottom of the ocean? Oh and brainiac...... A "false flag" does not need to be perfromed 100% by your own. It can be performed by someone else on your behalf. Though the TERM was originally called that because in the early days this is what would happen. However, in the last 50 years or more, a "false flag" has become a term used to signify a misrepresentation of an attack. Namely, blaming someone else when it was yourself or you hired someone else to do the job. Try visiting the library sometime, if your mom will let you out of the basement that is.

More ad hominem attacks...I read your pages on the Liberty, more conspiracy theory garbage..and by the way, I don't watch Fox News. Sorry to burst your bubble.

"Kiwiwriter - A "false flag" attack would be Americans in Israeli uniforms and aircraft bombing an American ship. So this does not apply."

See my previous comment, and to aid in your learning ability here is link for you to study.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
"False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one's own."

And I ask again, what was the purpose, under your theory, of the US government hiring those nefarious evil Jews to sink a US Navy intelligence ship? You haven't explained the purpose of this at all...just the quote that Lyndon Johnson wanted the ship sunk. Why did the Americans want those villainous, evil, conspiratorial Yids to sink an American intelligence-gathering ship? Please explain this act, since this is the centerpiece of your proof that American government agencies are routinely making war on American people under false flags for nefarious purposes.

"Kiwiwriter - Do try and learn to use the quote key, the English language, research tools that do not rely on web pages operated by neo-Nazi UFO nutters, and stop screaming hysterically. You're addressing folks who are not impressed by screaming and insults. Unlike you, we do get out of our basement occasionally."

Don't need to..... Oh, and so now you are the one who determines what is and what is not acceptable material? Oh great and mindless one, please tell me what is acceptable information???? Only that which supports your "conspiracy theory"?

More ad hominem attacks...which means that since you have no evidence for your case, beyond silly ideas and an utter hatred of George Bush, you attack your interlocutors.

Nor have you explained to me why you're here, what you hope to gain from being here, what your theory and narrative on what happened on 9/11 is about, what should be done to resolve this great crisis you have declared -- beyond insulting people anonymously.

Does insulting other people's intelligence anonymously on an internet forum bring down the US government? Does it expose the grand conspiracies? Does it wreck the careers of the evildoers? Does it execute the traitors? Does it put you in a position of power to save the world? Does it force the conspirators to confess?

You clearly haven't gained adherents or allies on this board...why haven't you sought out a site where you can attract like-minded folks to your cause and start developing a coherent and rational strategy and organization to bring down the evil forces that are threatening your personal freedoms, the greatness of America, and the American way of life, and move briskly, openly, and at risk to your person to save the greatness of America from these conspiracies, instead of blathering to eternity on the web?

Why haven't you taken up more determined action...instead of saying, "I don't know" about these mysteries, do the research yourself and come up with the answers, and present them openly. What's the risk? After all, under your scenario, the entire nation is beyond being at risk...we're all under the thumb of an omnipotent, malicious, evil government, bent on building its own power by destroying its own people. Your life is already forfeit to the secret police -- what more can they take from you? Isn't it time to launch the insurrection before it's too late?

What's stopping you? Fear of being unmasked, caught, and jailed? What then? Your life is wrecked already by the evil government conspiracy. Why not die a glorious and inspiring martyr, in the tradition of Nathan Hale, and be a beacon of hope and leadership to generations of revolutionaries yet unborn who will march in your footsteps to the inevitable triumph of freedom and democracy over the New World Order? For a leader in the fight against the New World Order tyranny and the Israeli puppetmasters, you're not much of a fighter. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Dr. King, all the great revolutionaries ran risks and did jail time. In much harsher prisons, too.

I'm astonished at how conspiracy theorists are very determined when they have nothing to risk.

At least come up with better arguments on your side than sneering at other people's intelligence and lack thereof. You might have noticed, among other things, that you're not winning friends and influencing people here. But I guess you haven't noticed that yet.
 
True, but...

Please stop replying to him and report him for violations of the forum rules....you are only encouraging him to continue his abuse.

Yeah, but I'm kind of trying to hand him more rope, so that he can hang himself.

Notice his last riposte to me was nothing but personal attacks on me and my intelligence.

And my mother...now, that's hitting below the belt. But given that this fella seriously believes the passengers on the four 9/11 flights were gassed on the flight and that the World Trade Center was destroyed in an insurance scam because it was facing housing code violations, I think a cheap shot at my mother can be ignored.
 
CHECK and MATE!

Throw out some beam weapon no plane stuff and declare victory!

How Loony are the Loons?

quote button!? can you use the quote button?

How Loony are the Loons? (beam weapon/no plane; how can he pick that out of a list of CT proposed evidential hearsay experts of no facts)

How Loony are the Loons?
 
removebush has been reported for the last three posts he has posted, without using the quote function.
 
You know, he's so 100% completely ignored my post correcting his NCE misquotes that he just has to be 28th in a bad disguise.....
 

Back
Top Bottom