Did yall miss this post:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2176771#post2176771
What else do I need to present in order for you to believe that 9/11 is an inside job?
Some evidence that you've bothered to read the post would be nice.
But it's good to know a CTist can still be relied on to go for the low-hanging fruit. I just knew you'd try to use that patent to support your position, and end up looking foolish.
Did you miss the description of the materials of the nozzle? Yes, you did, so here it is again:
Preferred materials for fabricating the nozzle 300 include high-density graphite and mineral/phenolic. High temperature plastics, such as glass-filled polyetheretherketone, may also be used.
So you'd need cylinders made of some of these materials, of at least a large enough size to cover the beams (not columns, alas) you're cutting. And you'd need at least as many as beams you cut, sorry, not re-useable. So, show me thousands of those on the ground around Ground Zero and you might have something. Or even some remnants of these that were destroyed in the process of the collapse.
Oh, and did you miss the dates? Yes, you did, so here they are again:
2002-07-09 US2002000191607 Filing date
2001-07-09 US2001000303949P Earliest priority date (they filed a provisional application, which usually means they have a basic idea, but haven't produced a complete working design yet)
So in July 2001 all they had was just a preliminary sketch of an idea. Between July and September, they not only perfected the design, they also scaled it up to the needed size, manufactured them all, delivered them to the site, and set them all up. Oh, sorry, I forgot that that "
wasn't too complex".
So, next time I post a patent, and there will be a next time, please try to
read it
before you analyse it. These inventors put a lot of effort into those things, and it's a shame you don't read them.
