This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

[defaultdotxbe]

Did yall miss this post:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2176771#post2176771

What else do I need to present in order for you to believe that 9/11 is an inside job?

in 2002 a patent was filed for a nozzle that allows thermite to cut a horizonatal beam

it then follows that in 2001 thermite was use to cut vertical columns in the world trade center?


and the funny thing is you didnt even present that "evidence"

 

[Arus808]

So you don't have a problem with American citizens being shot on American streets by the US government? Okay...tell that to the karma police.

where in the document does it say this?

WHY DO YOU THINK THEY ONLY Declassified 15 pages? You saw how bad some of that stuff looked...can you imagine what they're trying to hide with the other 130+ pages? You probably wouldn't be able to sleep at night if you read it.

we did read it. Its obvious you didn't

 

[Arus808]

I finally figured out what the cats mean. It's a diversionary tactic....that means I'm making too many good points for you all to debate - like all those mainstream media quotes from top government officials and military personal who all question 9/11 - how many more do you what from people who are speaking out? You want 300 people?

No it means that you're spewing the same garbage that we've debunked in the past, on this very forum and yu've rpovide nothing that would "change the way [we] look at 9/11 forever".

The cats are for are amusement till such time you present evidence that support your Opening post.

That's what we do, we keep ourselves amused until someone provides something of interest.

 

[jsfisher]

in 2002 a patent was filed for a nozzle that allows thermite to cut a horizonatal beam

it then follows that in 2001 thermite was use to cut vertical columns in the world trade center?


and the funny thing is you didnt even present that "evidence"

Actually, too, as I read the referenced post, it may well be the patent description meant to refer to a thermic lance and not a thermite anything. Thermite uses molten iron to do the cutting and not a flame, no?

 

[28th Kingdom]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2 - and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction. I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

 

[LashL]

I finally figured out what the cats mean. It's a diversonry [sic] tactic....that means I'm making too many good points for you all to debate

Quite the opposite, actually, but so far, you're batting 1000 at getting things dead wrong, so this latest example comes as no surprise.

 

[jsfisher]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2 - and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction. I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

The waving of hands, no matter how vigorous, does not constitute proof, scientific or otherwise.

 

[Arus808]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2 - and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction.

Unless I skipped over that post, would you mind reposting your chemistry analysis of the molten metal found at the WTC?

If you haven't done any chemical analysis, how did you prove scientifically that it was thermite? And how can you claim that its thermite when 90% of the buildigns were made with chemicals found in thermite?

I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

AGain, please provide your findings of any testing you have done thus far

 

[28th Kingdom]

There's some schematics that might turn you on:

http://neyersoftware.com/Papers/NDIAFuze/ThermiteTorch.htm

 

[Porkpie Hat]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2 - and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction. I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

Dude?

 

[babazaroni]

Did yall miss this post:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=2176771#post2176771

What else do I need to present in order for you to believe that 9/11 is an inside job?

So exactly, how can an 'elongated nozzle' be concealed then applied without human intervention to cut many vertical steel columns?

I think you're getting the hang of it Porkpie Hat. And you thought you would'nt fit in.

World's first cloned cat, CopyCat has three kittens naturally:

Article here

 

[defaultdotxbe]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2

you cant prove thermite by "analyzing behavior"

and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction.

you failed to provide evidence that thermite could leave a black residue (when in fact it leaves a white residue form aluminum oxide)

you also failed to explain how thermite could be made to cut straight at a 45 degree angle

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

except this statement is entirely false as was explained to you several times

 

[defaultdotxbe]

There's some schematics that might turn you on:

http://neyersoftware.com/Papers/NDIAFuze/ThermiteTorch.htm

EG&G Optoelectronics manufactures a pyrotechnically driven Thermite Torch that can be used for a variety of purposes. For example, it will effectively destroy a small electronic package by incineration. The device can be reliably ignited by a standard 3.5 amp 2-3 ms constant current pulse or a CDU charged to 20 mJ.

so if it can incinerate a small electronic package how does that translate to a straight cut of a steel support column?

 

[kookbreaker]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...

No you did not.

by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2

Analyzing?! With what? Why is molten metal proof of thermite?

- and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction.

No, sorry. Wrong.

I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

Because you don't. You are unable to realize the number of false assumptions you make in order to force your conclusion into place.

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

Why are you certain what you have is molten steel? Let's say it is steel for the sake of arguement. Why do you assume the above comment about color to be true?

 

[Mercutio]

I scientifically proved [snip]

Ok, that's funny. You get points for humour.

Seriously, are you conceding the 10-11 or so points you have "argued" thus far? Just a yes or no--or if needed, a yes or no on each one. It will make our (both your and your detractors) job much simpler.

 

[beachnut]

There's some schematics that might turn you on:

http://neyersoftware.com/Papers/NDIAFuze/ThermiteTorch.htm

Show us the working model silly man. Cats mean you have lost.

 

[JimBenArm]

no, your post was section 8, below it are the letters a and b (subsections of 8)

have you ever had to do an outline for a school essay?

It is obvious he hasn't. They don't let macaroons in school!

 

[The Almond]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2 - and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction. I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

Ok, let's talk about the word "proof." How do you know that you've proved something? Does everyone have to agree that it's true? Probably not. But what do scientists and researchers do when they want to prove something to be true, or when they've discovered something they've proved to be true?
They publish their results in reputible, peer-reviewed research journals along with their original data. It's put up for scrutiny by their peers both before and after publication. The widespread acceptance of the theory by academics and researchers can be shown through incorporation into design practices, textbooks, lectures and subsequent research.

Given this, how do you know that you've proved something to be true?

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

Cite this information in relevent scientific journals or textbooks, or publish this information in them.

 

[babazaroni]

28K,

Here's what I'm looking for in a possible thermite device:

It should be some kind containment device composed of a very high melting point material that can hold thermite against all surfaces (or even just one side) of a vertical steel column without operator intervention.

Then show it makes very similar cuts that we claim the clean-up welder's made.

I suspect the thermite will just follow gravity once it cuts into the steel and would not make anything like the cuts we've seen.

Now, for a start, what materials can withstand 4500 F to be used as the containment device?

 

[JimBenArm]

I scientifically proved therma/ite was at the towers...by analyzing the behavior of the pouring molten metal from WTC 2 - and also from the column with the black molten metal from a therma/ite reaction. I proved why it had to be something other than the slag from the column - but everyone just wants to make crap up and say I don't know what I'm talking about.

How would I go about backing up my scientific claims - like molten slag from steel CANNOT change colors from the original color of the steel?

By actually doing something scientific, like going out your own self and using a cutting torch on an I-beam, instead of sitting on your behind, looking at photos posted on CT websites, and pretending like you actually know what you're talking about. You know, some actual work. Surely someone in your family can describe it to you. They might have seen someone do it sometime in the past.

Oh, also, what a macaroon!