This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

Wow guys...I just had a pretty weird thing happen. I was just thinking...and I realized, that although there were supposedly 4 plane crashes (involving HUGE commercial airliners) and we have video footage of all four crash sites. WE HAVE NOT seen a SINGLE piece of plane wreckage. Wow, that is beyond bizarre. I never even thought about it...but I remember seeing a documentary where they have footage of the Flight 93 site...and the reporter on the scene says it's just a big hole...he doesn't see any wreckage...and then of course, the well documented Pentagon tapes...where there is NO plane wreckage...and then the two towers...where we probably have the best view...and I MEAN we don't see a LICK of plane wreckage anywhere...That IS BEYOND strange.
Does it hurt to be so wrong? I mean, is it painful? Do you use linament or oral medication of some kind?
 
I think the one glitch in US Operation 911 - was flight 93's (drone plane) failure to reach it's target. I think it was shot down by NORAD before it had a chance to crash into WTC 7. (That's why I say WTC 7 is the smoking gun, because it collapsed without a plane impact)



Does anyone else other than me appreciate just how utterly difficult it would be for an airliner travelling at 500 MPH to actually hit WTC7?




It's been widely reported that NORAD was conducting war game simulations on 9/11 (the exact same kind that happened on 9/11 - i.e. planes being flown into buildings) I think these simulated war games served as a diversionary tactic by the government to effectively disarm NORAD's response times - to real-life situations.


Got any evidence to support these assertions? Can you even name these mysterious wargames? How did these wargames "disarm NORAD's response times"?




But, ultimately...someone from NORAD did manage to catch up and shoot down Fight 93. Rumsfield, even admits Flight 93 was shot down:


False. UA93 flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder indicate UA93 was not shot down.

-Gumboot
 
We invaded Iraq...because Iraq was connected to the war on terror, yes? Because they might of had WMD's or because Saddam had ties to al Qeada, right? Just yes or no, please.


How does Saddam having WMD relate to the war on terror?

-Gumboot
 
No, what I do is bring mindfulness to the debate. I reframe things...by adding my own analysis to previously discussed topics, while also including some new ideas and theories as well.

About ONW: I'm the one who enlightened you past the 15 declassified pages, you think you debunked. ONW is over 150 pages in all. Even ABCnews says that the rest of it contains plans to kill innocent Americans.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=92662&page=1

That's what I do...I bring the big picture into focus.

You might be aware of the expression that says that Belz... is in the details ?

The problem is, the "big picture" can be made to be anything you like when you either ignore the details or arrange then in every which way you want.

How can someone trust your "big picture" without you justifying it ?
 
The odd thing is that he STILL hasn't realized that every smelly old piece of CT dung he drags out of the sewer isn't the Earth-shattering revelation he thinks it is. Most recently he hit us with the "Northwoods" bombshell, as if we hadn't already beaten that dead horse into protoplasmic goo.

This was more or less my first question about this thread. What here did he expect to "change the way we look at 9/11 FOREVER"? It's all the same old crap we hear from any random CT moron.

Not a single new piece of info there.
 
sometimes the truth movemant does have the appearance of a planned conspiracy, mainly to be used to bash the anti-war movemant.
 
veiled CT?

sometimes the truth movemant does have the appearance of a planned conspiracy, mainly to be used to bash the anti-war movemant.
Another CT? No the idiots of 9/11 truth are for real. Low IQs, selling lies, there is no need to drum up another CT to explain 9/11 truth.
 
As someone else mentioned ... Holy Thread Resurrection, Batman!

I have the little check mark against the thread signifying I've made a post here, god knows where, 59 pages of woo attack. :D
 
If the thread is not going to be discussed further, then it will drop off the screen again quite quickly. Please remember to keep posts on topic to the thread and forum.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom