• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

This is the thread that may very well change the way you look at 9/11 FOREVER!

28th Kingdom said:
Come on man...please cut out the charades. I am presenting clear visual evidence for my claims...and none of you can even present anything that even begins to approach something that would back up what your saying?

BTW, if I said that I'm a nuclear physicist would that change your opinions about what I have been saying?
Click to expand...

No, but my masters and years of work in Occupational Psyche tells me that you'd never pass my pre-screens in Public Safety, Emergency Medical, Public Health and Law Enforcement....
 
28th Kingdom said:
Dude, yer talking in riddles over there...please, plain english. I have no idea what your asking. I just proved why it couldn't have been cut by a clean up worker...BECAUSE I said that black stuff CAN'T be the melted remains of the steel from that column...since the black stuff is obviously a different color than the original steel...which means...if the black stuff can't be molten slag from a torch cut, than a clean up worker couldn't have been the one to make the cut...as a matter of fact...I'm SAYING that black stuff CAN'T BE slag from that column...so no ONE made the cut. THE BLACK stuff is from therma/ite - therma/ite produces it's OWN molten metal...which is in part IRON...which is black like that when cooled off. So, I am saying that therma/ite cut the column...and that black stuff that remains is molten iron that has cooled...molten iron from the therma/ite. THE STEEL from the column HAS NOT BEEN MELTED whatsoever...to imply slag from a torch cut implies the steel from the column has melted.

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/2271/thermiteut7.jpg

Look at the front edge of that column....although it's at a slant, you can see that it's clearly without any deformation from molten slag. It's completely unmelted and covered with black iron from the therma/ite.
Click to expand...

Oh, now I get it! You're a macaroon!

Sorry I didn't see that sooner!
 
28th Kingdom said:
On one hand...most of you here are near genius-like in your articulation of certain aspects of the sciences...unfortunately, on the other hand...you're tantamount to a half-functioning retard when it comes to common logic and sense.
Click to expand...

Common sense only works in common situations. Your experience heating pop tarts and watching television does not prepare you for the rigors of analyzing large-scale disasters like airliner crashes and building collapses.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Dude, yer talking in riddles over there...please, plain english. I have no idea what your asking. I just proved why it couldn't have been cut by a clean up worker....
Click to expand...


Except, we just showed you a picture of a cleanup worker in the process of cutting a similar column, at a similar angle, with a torch. Also, that photo is taken by the same photographer (or at least, it's from the same photo agency) as the one that "supports" your claims!

Do you have eyes?
 
28th Kingdom said:
Dude, yer talking in riddles over there...please, plain english. I have no idea what your asking. I just proved why it couldn't have been cut by a clean up worker...BECAUSE I said that black stuff CAN'T be the melted remains of the steel from that column...since the black stuff is obviously a different color than the original steel...which means...if the black stuff can't be molten slag from a torch cut, than a clean up worker couldn't have been the one to make the cut...as a matter of fact...I'm SAYING that black stuff CAN'T BE slag from that column...so no ONE made the cut. THE BLACK stuff is from therma/ite - therma/ite produces it's OWN molten metal...which is in part IRON...which is black like that when cooled off. So, I am saying that therma/ite cut the column...and that black stuff that remains is molten iron that has cooled...molten iron from the therma/ite. THE STEEL from the column HAS NOT BEEN MELTED whatsoever...to imply slag from a torch cut implies the steel from the column has melted.

http://img243.imageshack.us/img243/2271/thermiteut7.jpg

Look at the front edge of that column....although it's at a slant, you can see that it's clearly without any deformation from molten slag. It's completely unmelted and covered with black iron from the therma/ite.
Click to expand...

Do you know what steel is? It's iron with the impurities refined out of it. Modern steel has some other impurities added back in, to enhance its strength, but it's still mostly iron.
 
28th Kingdom said:
... THE BLACK stuff is from therma/ite - therma/ite produces it's OWN molten metal...which is in part IRON...which is black like that when cooled off. So, I am saying that therma/ite cut the column...and that black stuff that remains is molten iron that has cooled...molten iron from the therma/ite. THE STEEL from the column HAS NOT BEEN MELTED whatsoever...to imply slag from a torch cut implies the steel from the column has melted...
Click to expand...

1) Substantiating evidence to your claim that therm(i/a)te reside is black?
2) If therm(i/a)te were used to make the cut, where is the molten steel from the column? You are saying the residue visible is from the therm(i/a)te; the steel had to go somewhere. Where is it?
 
Just out of curiosity can anybody view the loose change forum? I can't tell if I've been banned or what. I certainly didn't do anything to warrant a ban.
 
28th Kingdom said:
Why is this cut so jagged...and the other one so clean? They look completely different to me.
Click to expand...

One picture is a close-up, the other is not.

And the far away shot does not look clean to me. In fact, there is quite a jagged region on the top part.
 
Last edited:
Dazed said:
Just out of curiosity can anybody view the loose change forum? I can't tell if I've been banned or what. I certainly didn't do anything to warrant a ban.
Click to expand...

DAZED!! Buddy...get in here...and mixed it up...we need another voice of reason.
 
28th Kingdom said:
...BECAUSE I said that black stuff CAN'T be the melted remains of the steel from that column...since the black stuff is obviously a different color than the original steel...
Click to expand...

You're repeating yourself, saying something does not constitute proof.

If you carry on repeating yourself you're liable to be reported for spamming.
 
28th Kingdom said:
I guess those oompa loompas that floated down from floors 55-62 (NIST Page 256) decided to prepare some treats for the workers at ground zero.
Click to expand...

The NIST report you have, of course, read. Right?

Also, I know you probably think that all anti-twoof sites are created by the government or Satan or someone, but have you actually read this.

Could you please tell me, in detail, what's wrong with the calculations and other evidence here?

Also, why does the thermite in this video produce such a jagged, uneven hole but the "thermite" you claim was used produces a cut identical to that of a cutting torch? I'm not just talking about a "jagged cut", I mean the thermite hole is considerably less even than the cuts on the girders.

How the hell did they even get thermite to burn sideways like that? It's not magic. Or is it?

So... got any other evidence?
 
28th Kingdom said:
A sphincter says what?
Click to expand...

I only have high-school-leaver's chemistry, and even I can answer that one. Seeing as you're a nuclear physicist, you'll need no more prompting that the answer to that question about the orange columns begins with "R" and ends in "UST".

Seeing as you already know the chemical composition of rust, I shan't worry to point that out to you, especially as you also know which key component of rust might combine with oxygen when burnt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom