• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Look at this collapse

Docker said:
Steel does not turn to rubber in a hydrocarbon fire.

Thanks for admitting you have no clue why my picture shows huge explosions
Click to expand...


But the steel IS turning to rubber.

And I have plenty of clues. And since you ask for them I'll share them with you.

These are not explosions. Some debris would go up if they were and as the screen capture from this bogus 'physics' video shows, the debris only goes sideways.
collapsecrap.jpg


It's steel snapping under pressure beyond our comprehension. Concrete smashing concrete with an astounding force.
 
Arus808 said:
it also is a means for me to complain to the forum admins for his conduct here. When someoen request that he remove something because he is presenting it as something else entirely, is fraud.
Click to expand...

I have not misquoted you. That is what you said. People quote me all the time and I don't complain.
 
alexg said:
But the steel IS turning to rubber.

And I have plenty of clues. And since you ask for them I'll share them with you.

These are not explosions. Some debris would go up if they were and as the screen capture from this bogus 'physics' video shows, the debris only goes sideways.
http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p255/imeggman/collapsecrap.jpg

It's steel snapping under pressure beyond our comprehension. Concrete smashing concrete with an astounding force.
Click to expand...
That picture shows debris shooting upward
 
Docker said:
Steel does not turn to rubber in a hydrocarbon fire.

Thanks for admitting you have no clue why my picture shows huge explosions
Click to expand...

Steel doesn't turn into rubber in any kind of fire - where did you learn your chemistry?
 
firecoins said:
Your obviously not materials expert, chemist, physist or an engineer. You can't mention your backround because you know one would believe a scientist could be so stupid.
Click to expand...

That has such power coming from an economist.
 
Docker said:
That picture shows debris shooting upward
Click to expand...

No it does not.

You see an apparent upward arc, correct? This is because the collapsing building is sucking, drafting, the cloud downward where it is still close to the collapse. Watch that video and you will see this is true. The video purports to show just what you said but they use the big horizontile plume as evidence. They just paused it moments after I did. Same applies to the stuff above.
 
Docker said:
Such as?
Click to expand...
do i honestly have to answer this? weve already discussed desks, there were also chairs, carpet, papers, computers, and (sad to say) people

as arkan said, normal office fires (without jet fuel) get hot enough to weaken steel, the role the jet fuel played was the spread the fire across 4 entire floors almost instantly, even if the fire supression systems int eh WTC were working they were never designed to combat a fire that large
 
Docker, as much as I appreciate your immaturity to attack me in your sig, it doesn't make you any smarter, nor does it prove any of your theories correct.

And where do you see these explosions?
 
defaultdotxbe said:
do i honestly have to answer this? weve already discussed desks, there were also chairs, carpet, papers, computers, and (sad to say) people
Click to expand...

Everything you list there is a hydrocarbon. Is this really the level of scientific knowledge I am up against?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom