• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Look at this collapse

Docker said:
There is a small amount of bowing. Now tell me how that bowing leads to the huge explosions shown in my photo.
Click to expand...

SMALL amount? How do you judge it small. Because the picture fits on your screen?

The steel is rubbery, the floors are sagging, it is about to collapse.

How does it lead to your picture?

I'm happy to admit I don't know enough about srtuctural mechanics, or whatever the proper field is, to answer that question, but if we clearly see the building is about to colapse before your picture is even taken then your picture is moot.
 
alexg said:
SMALL amount? How do you judge it small. Because the picture fits on your screen?

The steel is rubbery, the floors are sagging, it is about to collapse.

How does it lead to your picture?

I'm happy to admit I don't know enough about srtuctural mechanics, or whatever the proper field is, to answer that question, but if we clearly see the building is about to colapse before your picture is even taken then your picture is moot.
Click to expand...


Steel does not turn to rubber in a hydrocarbon fire.

Thanks for admitting you have no clue why my picture shows huge explosions
 
Arus808 said:
docker, remove my quote from your sig. Its out of context, and like a CT'er you quote mined it to suit your conclusion. REmove it, as you are presenting it as it means a totally different thing.
Click to expand...
Appealing to one who is intellectually dishonest, to stop their underhanded trickery, is a challenge. I applaud your efforts! But, grant you little hope.
 
firecoins said:
we already have enough ongoing threads about the collapse and concret cores and general stupidity. Untils Dockers provides more infor on his thoughts or his backround its best not to reply.
Click to expand...

it would be unique if he had something new
 
Wowbagger said:
Appealing to one who is intellectually dishonest, to stop their underhanded trickery, is a challenge. I applaud your efforts! But, grant you little hope.
Click to expand...


it also is a means for me to complain to the forum admins for his conduct here. When someoen request that he remove something because he is presenting it as something else entirely, is fraud.
 
Docker said:
Steel does not turn to rubber in a hydrocarbon fire.

Thanks for admitting you have no clue why my picture shows huge explosions
Click to expand...
I can address this! The pictures show a huge billow of material, because there was still a freakin' passenger jet, loaded with fuel, in there! What did you think it was going to look like? A squashing soda can?
 
Docker said:
There is a small amount of bowing. Now tell me how that bowing leads to the huge explosions shown in my photo.
Click to expand...

What Hugh explosion?

The one the size of a small atomic bomb that rang out across New York? Oh wait, it was a quiet one wasn't it?

The building is collapsing and generating a massive dust cloud as it goes.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
Standard house/office fires reach sufficient temperature to weaken steel.


Please, do elucidate as to what elements of the picture indicate explosions.
Click to expand...

Erm could it be the huge orbital ejection of dust and debris, the steel flying out horizontally.
 
Docker said:
Steel does not turn to rubber in a hydrocarbon fire.

Thanks for admitting you have no clue why my picture shows huge explosions
Click to expand...
Your obviously not materials expert, chemist, physist or an engineer. You can't mention your backround because you know one would believe a scientist could be so stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom