• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Look at this collapse

I copied the quote directly from your post.

You copied one sentence out of an entire paragraph. That is quote mining.

My exact quote:
I've read about half of the report *(only the sections that i was interested in, and re-reading to read other sections when I feel the need to prove something).

You even edited the context of it:
"I've read about half of the report (only sections that I was interested in)." - as it was in your sig.

Tell me how this is not quote mining.
 
Last edited:
There are explosions movement of air under pressure, explosions are only the rapid movement of air caused by a shock wave, the Shock wave this time is created by the air being forced from the building by the debris.
There are Explosions just no explosives necessary to cause them, all you need is compressed air.
Try Putting 1000 psi in an inter-tube from a car tire and you will see the same effect. Air can cause explosions without explosives.
Buildings are built for the air spaces they contain not for the solid walls that surround them.

Fine....


EXPLOSIVES DOCKER???
 
You copied one sentence out of an entire paragraph. That is quote mining.

I have removed your quote. Contrary to what you think, my intention is not to upset people. As you really wanted it removed I have done so.

Quotes in sigs are just meant as a bit of fun, like pardalis using an alex jones picture with a tin hat on.

I laugh when I get misquoted.
 
I'll take this one. Cellulose is a carbohydrate, not a hydrocarbon, as it contains oxygen in addition to hydrogen and carbon.
:)

although his notion that hydrocarbon fires cant hurt steel was flawed to begin with

hey docker, you never did tell me what acetylene does to steel
 
Am I being asked a serious question by a man who has bothered to photoshop my avatar with a tin foil hat?

This gets worse.

So you are going to ignore him because of a moot subject?

What's next? Are you going to ignore my questions because I wear green shoes??
 
You're implying that controlled demolitions brought down the towers, which that makes it a very huge claim. What makes your assessment valid? What are your credentials?
 
So you are going to ignore him because of a moot subject?

What's next? Are you going to ignore my questions because I wear green shoes??

These shoes, are they very long at the front?

Do car doors ever fall off when you open them?
 
CH2O, notice it contains hydrogen and carbon. Need I say more.
congratulations, you have officialy lost all credibility as far as im concerned, you shoudl at least make sure you know soemthing before talking about it

C6H10O5

note the oxygen, making it a carbohydrate, not a hydrocarbon
 
Am I being asked a serious question by a man who has bothered to photoshop my avatar with a tin foil hat?

You just said it yourself that avatars and sigs were just for fun.

Why don't you answer my serious question to your serious claim?
 
congratulations, you have officialy lost all credibility as far as im concerned, you shoudl at least make sure you know soemthing before talking about it

C6H10O5

note the oxygen, making it a carbohydrate, not a hydrocarbon

CH2O(s) + O2(g) -----> CO2(g) + H2O(g)

here is the equation of wood burning in oxygen

you are wrong
 

Back
Top Bottom