Video: Bombs Going Off Before The 2nd Plane Hits?

Actually, in the video in the OP, at 1 minute and 24 seconds into the video, you can see the exact same type of white flashes on another building.

There are two buildings in the video with sharp peaks to the left of the WTC. The white flashes are visible on the one closest to the WTC on the lefthand side of the bldg.

You can see the white flashes all the way until about 1:55 when the cloud from the collapsing WTC envelopes the building.

Edited to correct "right" to "left". Two buildings with sharp peaks to the LEFT of the WTC.
 
Last edited:
It very obvious that these are compression artifacts.

CCD's also have trouble with bright spots. The brightness overloads the pixel element and it bleeds over into the next one. If the overload is big enough, you'll get whole lines of pixels turning white. The "spaceships" in SOHO and LASCO images are good examples of this pixel bleeding.
 
If you read my last post before I edited it, the buildings with the peaks on them are to the LEFT of the WTC. And the one with the same flashes on it is the one closest to the WTC.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
Sorry, my bad..Very busy....what's any of that got to do with me?
Click to expand...
They were all questions which had been put to you but not answered -- again, the forums are very fast here. Thanks for getting back to them.

1. I don't care what CDI's PR department (aka, "nice people") have to say.
Click to expand...
Hmm. Perhaps your earlier comments were misinterpreted. When you said, "Actually, one of the govt's top demo specialist said it was a controlled demo the day of the event," were you referring to the comments Ray Griffin attributed to an expert at Controlled Demolitions, or to some other top demolitions specialist?

2. Raul Castro Guevara's opinion is largely irrelevent in light of ALL the facts. Questioning his credentials doesn't negate anything.
Click to expand...
You quoted him. Why would you quote a guy unless you had at least some confidence that he was speaking from a position of knowledge.

3.Federal Taxation of people's wages and salary is a fraud. Google "Joe Banister".
Click to expand...
I know all about Mr. Banister, the guy who paid his taxes. So what's your take -- real deal or government plant?


I eagerly await your comments about the relevance of Mr. Berg's condition to who killed him.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
I meant besides the WTC.
Click to expand...

I'd consider the other WTC building to be another building. With the same reflective characteristics as well and thus equally prone to bleed-over compression effects. ANd sure enough the pixels pop up at several points on the other WTC building without any correlation to a plane impact, collapse point, or anything whatsoever.

Other buildings in the shot? I don't know, I'm at work and cannot view the video, only your pics. There are not many other buildings in your pics, in fact nothing at all in focus. Bronze Dog states that those corners are dark, and that would be a very good reason for a lack of such artifacts

You still failed to explain why these teeny-weeny 'explosives' are going to be any more powerful than the plane's impact.

You also fail to explain why these 'explosives' went off and took an hour to cause any collapse.
 
He also fails to explain how these explosives could get there in the first place.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
Can you explain why these "compression artifacts" only occur on the corners of the WTC 1 and 2 and no where else on the video?
Click to expand...

Owned.

Now if someone can do a video capture and post what I am talking about in my last two posts, we can be all done here.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
"Clearly pixilization"? It's hardly "clear". Explain why it happens to begin in the south tower EXACTLY where the plane hits and only really occurs on the corner columns?
Click to expand...
At the risk of biting on trollbait...

It doesn't. On my computer, the compressed video displays over 25 flashes on the far left column before the impact, 10 of which occur before the plane even enters the frame.

Liar, liar, pants on fire.

There, I've explained it.

Now go make up another story.

- Timothy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom