Video: Bombs Going Off Before The 2nd Plane Hits?

Starthinker said:
Clearly pixilation. I mean, clearly. Someone who looks at this Quicktime video and see's flashes and interprets them as explosions clearly doesn't know how digital video compression works. This has to be troll or some other intentional nest-stirring.
Click to expand...
No. It's Roxdog, and he's quite sincere.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
It is in some frames and not in others because they are flashes of light. They are all over the towers. Can you explain why these "compression artifacts" only occur on the corners of the WTC 1 and 2 and no where else on the video? Maybe the 9/11 commission has an opinion on this? Oh, wait, no, they don't.
Click to expand...

This was already answered, had you read it:

This is because the camera is pointing into the sun and the CCD is generating flash pixels.
Click to expand...

You answered your own question, they appear on the corner because that's where the most light/reflection of the sun is. Digital recording does that.
 
So tiny, tiny explostions that look like exactly like reflections and video compression artifcacts happened and the building fell down over an hour later.

Riii-ight.
 
I don't think that's a good enough explanation for the flashes appearing all over the corner column in different places. Some say it is pixelation, you say it's the sun. I say it's the explosions everyone and their grandmother reported going off.
 
Let me add one more thing, if those pixilations were explosions then they would be no larger than a firecracker. Yes, I was munitions inspector and did demolition for 5 years in the Air Force. Any blast capable of even breaking a window would be much larger than that and leave behind puffs of smoke, debris and other things. If, for some reason, you actually still believe those pixilations are demolition blasts then I really feel sorry for you.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
Why don't you compare those flashes with the size of the tower? Then go look at other controlled demos and see the same flashes.
Click to expand...

Please show a controlled demo that has multiple flashes of light several minutes before a building falls, all in the same spot over and over, with NO ejecta.

Hey, did you know there are blue fairies on the moon? Maybe NASA has an opinion on this. Oh, wait, no, they don't.
 
Starthinker said:
Let me add one more thing, if those pixilations were explosions then they would be no larger than a firecracker. Yes, I was munitions inspector and did demolition for 5 years in the Air Force. Any blast capable of even breaking a window would be much larger than that and leave behind puffs of smoke, debris and other things. If, for some reason, you actually still believe those pixilations are demolition blasts then I really feel sorry for you.
Click to expand...
That's one point I was considering bringing up. Controlled demos when I've seen them stirr up a fair bit of dust, even before the building starts moving down. Not seeing that here, which is suspicious considering that we're talking about glass.

Of course, some pixels next to white pixels being turned white by compression artifacts is a lot more plausible than a bunch of guys sneaking into the building and planting several tons of explosives.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compression_artifacts

You can tell from the title sequence that the video is suffering from compression artifacts:
911_2.jpg

911_1.jpg
 
The ripple of flashes in the TX tower are practically identical to the ripple of flashes that appear in the North Tower. This is fact.
 
conspiracybeliever said:
The ripple of flashes in the TX tower are practically identical to the ripple of flashes that appear in the North Tower. This is fact.
Click to expand...

I won't argue that point, as I don;t have enough specialized knowledge to definatively say otherwise. However, many of those flashes occur in mid-air after the building falls, this is also fact.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom