Video: Bombs Going Off Before The 2nd Plane Hits?

You know, if they are explosions (which they are not, but bear with me), then whoever is responsible for this conspiracy is a complete idiot. First crash a plane into the WTC, attracting every person with a video camera in the area, including all the major news networks, then set off explosions? That makes no sense at all if our conspirators don't want us to know about the explosives.

Far more likely that this particular low quality video has some artifacts in it. How many times on 9/11 and in the days afterwards did we see the video on the news of the second plane? If there were explosions, they would have been noticed then. The media would have been all over that.
 
I'm reminded of those alien kooks who zoom in on NASA photos until you can see the pixels, and then employ the magic "Sharpen" filter in Adobe Photoshop until they get what they want.
 
Roxdog, can you establish to us that you know enough about about video compression to prove that these are not compression artifacts?

Right now you are just trying to dodge and weave, badly, like the whiney coward that you are.
 
Before I go:

So the flashes in the TX building are explosions but identical flashes in the WTC are the sun/pixelization. Gotcha....

And someone please say for the record that it is a coincidence the flashes begin EXACTLY where the plane hits the south tower.

Well, for one, the TX demolition clearly shows the explosion spanning multiple pixels in the video, whereas the WTC video anomolies are limited to one pixel.
 
Roxdog, can you establish to us that you know enough about about video compression to prove that these are not compression artifacts?

I don't, but from the sounds of it niether does anyone here. How come the flashes pretty much only occur on the corner columns? I state in my post I want the original footage. I find it highly suspicious that these flashes begin PRECISELY where the 2nd plane hits and then seem to happen when there is something else to distract from it. As the fireball expands we see the flashes rippling up and down the corner. When the SOuth tower collapses we see the same thing. Wierd timing.

Right now you are just trying to dodge and weave, badly, like the whiney coward that you are.
Nothing I've done would indicate I am a coward. :D

Your insults ring hollow...
 
I don't, but from the sounds of it niether does anyone here. How come the flashes pretty much only occur on the corner columns? I state in my post I want the original footage. I find it highly suspicious that these flashes begin PRECISELY where the 2nd plane hits and then seem to happen when there is something else to distract from it. As the fireball expands we see the flashes rippling up and down the corner. When the SOuth tower collapses we see the same thing. Wierd timing.

In other words, you have no evidence that these flashes were explosions.
 
I don't, but from the sounds of it niether does anyone here. How come the flashes pretty much only occur on the corner columns?

Because that is where there is a surface witht he exact same color as your 'flashes'. That's one of the root causes of errors is bleedover from other surface colors. Even non-experts can understand that. Why are your 'flashes' pixels the exact same color as the color of the corners? Hmmm?

I state in my post I want the original footage. I find it highly suspicious that these flashes begin PRECISELY where the 2nd plane hits and then seem to happen when there is something else to distract from it.

Meaning nothing. There is no evidence whatsoever that these are anything other than pixels.

As the fireball expands we see the flashes rippling up and down the corner. When the South tower collapses we see the same thing. Wierd timing.

Nothing I've done would indicate I am a coward. :D

Except for your pretending to be someone else, you complaints about critics on the Loose Change forum, your inability to address questions and issues. There's more...
 
Cool. There's the question about Raul Castro Guevara, which you can answer here because HG asked or back where it was asked originally. Please note that I already did your homework for you on the matter of Dr. Nordby on account of I'm such a sweetheart. We don't always expect our answers to come back the way we predict -- we modify our theories to fit the facts and the available facts so far indicate that Dr. Nordby exists, that he's a legit forensics guy and that there's no reason to suspect that he didn't say what was attributed to him. We'd just like to learn the same thing about Dr. Castro Guevara.

Then there's the relevance of Mr. Berg's condition to who killed him. That's here.

And a response to Sultanist's email from the nice people at Controlled Demolition, Inc. That one's here.

That should get you started. Thanks in advance.

Oh, and the tax thing. Legally speaking, do Americans have to pay income tax on American income?
I realize this forum moves pretty fast, so I thought I'd repost this lest it get missed and you are inaccurately portrayed as having lied when you said you'd have no problem responding to any and all questions put to you.
 
I realize this forum moves pretty fast, so I thought I'd repost this lest it get missed and you are inaccurately portrayed as having lied when you said you'd have no problem responding to any and all questions put to you.

You don't think he'd avoid your questions, do ya Manny? After all, he isn't a coward, he even said so.
 
As the fireball expands we see the flashes rippling up and down the corner. When the SOuth tower collapses we see the same thing. Wierd timing.
Hmm... let's see, white pixels moving up and down a white vertical line recorded on a device that involves vertical scanning, displayed on another that involves vertical redraw, and they, with a BIG stretch of the imagination, match up with controlled demolitions. Yeah, that's weird. What's also weird is that dowsing pendulums move back and forth, and so do rocking chairs. Pendulums sometimes go round and round, and so do the wheels on the bus. Synchronicity, it is!

Oh, crud, I've got that song in my head, now.

ETA: Oh, and what "fireball"? I don't see a "fireball".
 
How come no flashes on the corner columns of any other buidlings? Towards the end the flashes are quite evident but they only appear on the corner columb of the WTC and not on any other building (or anywhere else on the video for that matter). Very strange.
 
How come no flashes on the corner columns of any other buidlings? Towards the end the flashes are quite evident but they only appear on the corner columb of the WTC and not on any other building (or anywhere else on the video for that matter). Very strange.
Because those corners are dark.
 
How come no flashes on the corner columns of any other buidlings? Towards the end the flashes are quite evident but they only appear on the corner columb of the WTC and not on any other building (or anywhere else on the video for that matter). Very strange.


Ask someone who knows about video. But that's not important. What evidence do YOU have that they were explosions?
 
I realize this forum moves pretty fast, so I thought I'd repost this lest it get missed and you are inaccurately portrayed as having lied when you said you'd have no problem responding to any and all questions put to you.
Sorry, my bad..Very busy....what's any of that got to do with me?

1. I don't care what CDI's PR department (aka, "nice people") have to say.

2. Raul Castro Guevara's opinion is largely irrelevent in light of ALL the facts. Questioning his credentials doesn't negate anything.

3.Federal Taxation of people's wages and salary is a fraud. Google "Joe Banister".
 
How come no flashes on the corner columns of any other buidlings? Towards the end the flashes are quite evident but they only appear on the corner columb of the WTC and not on any other building (or anywhere else on the video for that matter). Very strange.

Have you even looked at other videos of the attack which show the same corner? Do ANY of them corroborate your theory?

My theory is the answer is "No" to both questions.
 

Back
Top Bottom