Elsewhere I said that I think the Rapture has happened and all the godly Christians have ascended into the sky. Which says something to those Rapture believers who haven't got to heaven.What? I've missed it again?
This is just sooooo annoying.
Are you just unable to understand the impact of your own words?No idea what the actual ◊◊◊◊ you're talking about here, but that's par for the course.
I wasn't escalating anything. In fact, not giving a ◊◊◊◊ the funeral is happening is the antithesis of escalating. Your comment here escalated it more than anything I've done or promoted.
I see that "the left" didn't even need to show up since it appears "the right" trashed the entire area themselves.
You're revelling and hoping for people to get angry along political lines. You're expressing joyful expectation about watching those you've deemed to be political opponents being upset, and you're effectively communicating that their pain and anger is your objective. It's not that you don't care about Kirk - it's that you actively WANT to see other people be hurt and angered.It's going to be outstanding because the right is going to lose. their. ◊◊◊◊. when the bulk of the left gives no ◊◊◊◊◊ at all about Charlie. It's going to amp up a bunch of people. I'm so looking forward to it.
What do you think constitutes hatred in this context?Why is hating trans people political speech? Sounds like run-of-the-mill bigotry to me...or is that what you're saying? Are you saying that trans bigotry is a political stance of the right-wing?
Are there any white females in political position that you think don't have the brain power that the job should merit? Any white males? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that Rep. Mace and Pres. Trump would both qualify.Saying 4 black women don't have the brain power for thought isn't political, it's racist.
Did Kirk say they shouldn't have rights? Which rights?Saying trans people shouldn't have rights isn't political, it's bigotry.
What do you think constitutes hatred in this context?
For example... do you think that female citizens wanting to have penis-free spaces where they're naked or vulnerable is hatred? Do you think that females wishing to have the right to refuse to consent to seeing a stranger's dick in a female shower is hatred? Do you think females objecting to being forced to share prison cells with fully intact males is hatred?
Uh he's said gay people should be stoned to death, and we should just "take care of" trans people like back in the day. Which I suppose means police or vigilantes disappearing them into shallow graves.Are there any white females in political position that you think don't have the brain power that the job should merit? Any white males? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that Rep. Mace and Pres. Trump would both qualify.
Did Kirk say they shouldn't have rights? Which rights?
I think it's sexist bigotry to insist that males who claim to have transgender identities should have the right to override female boundaries.
Well, I can find the first clip. I can also see that Kirk wasn't advocating for gay people to be stoned to death, but was pointing out ways in which bible verses can be cherry picked to support someone's views. I can also find clips of Kirk quite ardently defending gay people being republicans. Consider this snopes article outlining the claim that Kirk supported gay people being stoned to death:Uh he's said gay people should be stoned to death, and we should just "take care of" trans people like back in the day. Which I suppose means police or vigilantes disappearing them into shallow graves.
You can use google if you want.
Nice to know you think that male exhibitionism is a-okay and females should just stfu and know their place, I guess.I suppose thats just as bad as a woman seeing a penis in a shower though in your world.
Are you just unable to understand the impact of your own words?
You're revelling and hoping for people to get angry along political lines. You're expressing joyful expectation about watching those you've deemed to be political opponents being upset, and you're effectively communicating that their pain and anger is your objective. It's not that you don't care about Kirk - it's that you actively WANT to see other people be hurt and angered.
For all intents, this is you egging on further political schism, and looking forward to continuing escalation.
What do you think constitutes hatred in this context?
For example... do you think that female citizens wanting to have penis-free spaces where they're naked or vulnerable is hatred? Do you think that females wishing to have the right to refuse to consent to seeing a stranger's dick in a female shower is hatred? Do you think females objecting to being forced to share prison cells with fully intact males is hatred?
Are there any white females in political position that you think don't have the brain power that the job should merit?
Any white males?
I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that Rep. Mace and Pres. Trump would both qualify.
Did Kirk say they shouldn't have rights? Which rights?
I think it's sexist bigotry to insist that males who claim to have transgender identities should have the right to override female boundaries.
Uh he's said gay people should be stoned to death, and we should just "take care of" trans people like back in the day. Which I suppose means police or vigilantes disappearing them into shallow graves.
You can use google if you want.
I suppose thats just as bad as a woman seeing a penis in a shower though in your world.
Not your argument, but building off what you say.. Do you not have shower cubicals in America? I mean seriously now much time do you spend naked with strangers because my answer is 'zero'?
Not your argument, but building off what you say.. Do you not have shower cubicals in America? I mean seriously now much time do you spend naked with strangers because my answer is 'zero'?
I see, so yes, you would rather trans people be murdered than see a penis in a locker room.Well, I can find the first clip. I can also see that Kirk wasn't advocating for gay people to be stoned to death, but was pointing out ways in which bible verses can be cherry picked to support someone's views. I can also find clips of Kirk quite ardently defending gay people being republicans. Consider this snopes article outlining the claim that Kirk supported gay people being stoned to death:
And also consider this clip of Kirk telling someone that denying gay people from being republicans is neither christian nor conservative:![]()
Charlie Kirk didn't say gay people should be stoned to death
The Turning Point USA co-founder and conservative commentator was fatally shot while speaking at a Utah college.www.snopes.com
I can't find a clip of the claim for transgender stuff. The closest I can find is someone else talking about it, and saying that it wasn't mafia-esque "take care of wink-wink-nudge-nudge" but rather advocating much more comprehensive mental health care for people in an effort to bring them into alignment with their bodies.
I've got to ask, have you actually watched anything more than curated snippets of Kirk's debates?
Prior to this event, I'd seen maybe a handful of clips from debates on college campuses. Kirk certainly mocked a lot of liberal views, usually by challenging why students held certain views, and whether or not they could support their assertions. Kirk held views I disagree with, definitely, but I hadn't seen anything that was actually hateful or that supported or advocated for violent - nothing that seemed to align with what people were saying about how evil and sexist and racist Kirk was, how they incited violence and was a white supremacist. And I still haven't managed to find anything that actually supports those claims. I can find plenty of pretty traditional christian views - which isn't at all surprising, given that Kirk was pretty openly and staunchly christian. But I can't find anything that actually supports the view that they were a hateful evil person who deserved to be killed for the greater good.
Nice to know you think that male exhibitionism is a-okay and females should just stfu and know their place, I guess.
Seriously - why do you think that any male should have the right-by-law to expose their genitals to non-consenting females?
True, but you might consider the followingThe thread's current title is "Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University event. / Charlie Kirk Shot And Killed", should it be amended to reflect this fascinating new content?
Translation... I've had the luxury of not having to be in the places where this happens and never having had it happen to me, so obviously nobody else could possibly have had that experience so it totally must just be hate.Same here, none. Then again, I don't go to a public gym, I have all that stuff in my house. I can't think of a single time in the last 25 years (I'm 44 and marched in Drum Corps where we traveled and had to shower together) that I've been naked with unknown people in the bathroom.
It isn't just this specific post but That Thread is leaking containment again and the usual suspects are getting on their hobbyhorse and firing up the ol' monomania. I understand that some discussion of the shooter having a trans roommate and what that might have done for their worldview on trans rights might well come up as part of the thread but this isn't Transwomen Aren't Women 2 Electric Boogaloo.Translation... I've had the luxury of not having to be in the places where this happens and never having had it happen to me, so obviously nobody else could possibly have had that experience so it totally must just be hate.