theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
It's always interesting to see pro-trans arguments* that concede the point that transwomen aren't women.
*I.e., anti-woman arguments.
It's always interesting to see pro-trans arguments* that concede the point that transwomen aren't women.
World Boxing Championships start on 4 September, but it seems unlikely that the case will be heard before then, and CAS has ruled they will not remove the suspension before the case is heard.Imane Khelif has appealed to the court of arbitration for sport over World Boxing’s decision to bar the 26-year-old from its events without a preliminary genetic sex test.
Words fail. The UK remains a free, civil and tolerant place, but the success of TRAs in blatant bullying is making it less so by the day.This is absolutely freaking insane.
![]()
I just got arrested again
I arrived back in London to discover the UK is still a police state run by trans activistsgrahamlinehan.substack.com
I'll have to remember this one, the next time some smug brit tells me the UK is the more civilized nation, in its sparing use of armed police.Words fail. The UK remains a free, civil and tolerant place, but the success of TRAs in blatant bullying is making it less so by the day.
Yeah, good one. Not used to jokes from you.I'll have to remember this one, the next time some smug brit tells me the UK is the more civilized nation, in its sparing use of armed police.
Wild that you don't see any connection here, given that every policy proposal so far has treated transwomen and transmen alike.[Females] who look like men aren't the problem. Men who demand an entitlement to be there regardless of how women feel about it are the problem.
Assuming females who pass as males are forced by federal policy to go back to using women's spaces, they will be among those most affected by an upsurge in the sort of policing you describe here.Entitling women, by social convention and by law, to police their spaces without fear of reprisal.
During almost all of that time we had not yet seen the post-2012 upsurge in adolescent onset gender dysphoria (mostly females) who would go on to use cross-sex hormones and subsequently pass as the opposite sex. You're promoting return to time-tested solution without accounting for changed circumstances on the ground; this is Maginot Line thinking.That solution has worked for decades, maybe even a century or more.
No.so when you said that we need to keep people who look like men out of women's spaces, you were kidding?
Who on Earth has been adversely affected by masculine looking females in women's spaces?literally everyone effected
I think the issue is far wider than who feels threatened
Nothing says "I've always been female and deserve to compete as such" quite like fighting for the legal right to refuse genetic testing.World Boxing Championships start on 4 September, but it seems unlikely that the case will be heard before then, and CAS has ruled they will not remove the suspension before the case is heard.
Are we quite sure Graham Holland isn't Godfrey Elfwick?I'm just posting this to fry Polka's brain.
A Parkrun official who's on the pro-trans side. And evidently thinks that the police state will leave him alone because he's on their side.Who? What?
Ok. So "people who look like men" would include some transmen and lesbians and ciswomen who appear masculine. Although you said not to presume or guess that.
I don't recall the issue being restricted to just them. But to answer you, the recent young lady in the Minnesota Buffalo Wild Wings restroom debacle seems a bit "adversely affected". And it wouldn't take much to perceive Buck Angel as threatening to women who did not know who he was.Who on Earth has been adversely affected by masculine looking females in women's spaces?
I'm not sure who they are exactly, and fairly confident I don't care.Certainly not the radfems & gendercrits, they've got plenty of butch ladies in their own ranks and don't seem to mind at all.
I say there is one. Dignity and respect.Maybe you could come up with an example of what the issue is claimed to be by someone who actually says there is one?
Why does treating males as males not constitute treating them with dignity and respect?I say there is one. Dignity and respect.
Some of them don't think of themselves as males. I believe them. I believe they are sincere, and have mentioned the one I know personally and watched transition from troubled boy to well adjusted woman. I think it is needlessly cruel to refer to her as a man when she looks and acts like a freaking model (she is very slightly built and fine featured, even as a teen boy).Why does treating males as males not constitute treating them with dignity and respect?
So? Some anorexics think of themselves as being fat. That's not a sufficient basis to treat them as such. The honesty of their beliefs isn't in question here, the accuracy is. If a male thinks of himself as female, he is still in fact male.Some of them don't think of themselves as males.
I thought you were on board with gender being different than sex? Why does treating them as a woman require treating them as female? Why does treating them as male require treating them as a man?I believe they are sincere, and have mentioned the one I know personally and watched transition from troubled boy to well adjusted woman. I think it is needlessly cruel to refer to her as a man when she looks and acts like a freaking model (she is very slightly built and fine featured, even as a teen boy).
Because in interpersonal relationships, we don't refer to people in objectively accurate terms. You ain't generally calling a fat person fat, true or not. We often defer to self ID, like if someone says they are a Christian, we don't tell them how they aren't because we don't agree with some aspect of their lifestyle that we think is inconsistent with Christianity.So? Some anorexics think of themselves as being fat. That's not a sufficient basis to treat them as such. The honesty of their beliefs isn't in question here, the accuracy is. If a male thinks of himself as female, he is still in fact male.
I am.I thought you were on board with gender being different than sex?
Telling them what restroom they can use, for starters. Although you've come right out and said that you don't believe they are sincere, and transgenderism is a lifestyle choice, and that we should discriminate against them, so I don't think we'll get too far here. Our starting assumptions are too disparate.Why does treating them as a woman require treating them as female? Why does treating them as male require treating them as a man?
That's their problem. They're still male whether they like it or not.Some of them don't think of themselves as males.
That's your right, but no-one else should be forced to believe them.I believe them. I believe they are sincere, and have mentioned the one I know personally and watched transition from troubled boy to well adjusted woman.
Good for him. It doesn't change the irrefutable, objective scientific reality that they are male, and will always be male.I think it is needlessly cruel to refer to her as a man when she looks and acts like a freaking model (she is very slightly built and fine featured, even as a teen boy).
Absolutely, but irrelevant. The issue is whether we decide to be douchebags to them or treat them with respect and dignity. We all make our choices.That's their problem. They're still male whether they like it or not.
That's your right, but no-one else should be forced to believe them.
Good for him. It doesn't change the irrefutable, objective scientific reality that they are male, and will always be male.