The Truth about RFK Jr

The second theory is very different, it posits that a virus was changed from being 'harmless' to being the pandemic virus by deliberate manipulation in a laboratory, 'gain of function'. There is considerable evidence against this theory. It does seem politically a more useful theory as it can be used to justify a number of policy decisions.
In his Politico interview (link upthread), Dr. Bhattacharya said, "There was an international effort to try to supposedly prevent pandemics by finding viruses and pathogens in the wild, like in bat caves, for instance, in southern China, bringing them into labs, making them more transmissible to check if it was possible to cause a pandemic. I think that was a very, very dangerous kind of utopian research agenda. I’m convinced that research agenda led to this pandemic through a lab leak in China, in Wuhan. But that was a global effort.
 
In February Reuters reported, ""He (Kennedy) has also committed that he will work within current vaccine approval and safety monitoring systems and not establish parallel systems," [Senator] Cassidy said in a speech on the Senate floor."
 
If I understand correctly, it sounds as if the policy is for children to be infected with the virus as their first exposure to an antigen.See my comment #1675. It also sounds as if the most recent decisions represent a deviation from the standard procedure of who makes them. What am I missing here?
So the kiddies can give the virus to the more vulnerable members of the family? Check.

Not a very well-thought-out policy.
 
In his Politico interview (link upthread), Dr. Bhattacharya said, "There was an international effort to try to supposedly prevent pandemics by finding viruses and pathogens in the wild, like in bat caves, for instance, in southern China, bringing them into labs, making them more transmissible to check if it was possible to cause a pandemic. I think that was a very, very dangerous kind of utopian research agenda. I’m convinced that research agenda led to this pandemic through a lab leak in China, in Wuhan. But that was a global effort.
I suppose we should be grateful he isn't spreading a 'Yellow Peril' agenda or attributing it to Dr Fu Manchu. I think the science is clear that humans from this era could not have done that. It is possible that time travelling AIs or ET intelligences may have had the technology and knowledge to have created SARS-CoV-2, but it definitely wasn't the result of contemporaneous research or a lab leak in Wuhan (where they definitely didn't have the technology).
 
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
I had a wonderful meeting with Argentine President @JMilei about our nations’ mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system based on gold-standard science and free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control.
 
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
I had a wonderful meeting with Argentine President @JMilei about our nations’ mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system based on gold-standard science and free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!

Actually, not funny.
 
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
I had a wonderful meeting with Argentine President @JMilei about our nations’ mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system based on gold-standard science and free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control.

A suicide pact in which people other than the two protagonists die.
 
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
I had a wonderful meeting with Argentine President @JMilei about our nations’ mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system based on gold-standard science and free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control.
I think he means"gold' in the same sense as the Oval Office is"gold".
 
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
I had a wonderful meeting with Argentine President @JMilei about our nations’ mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system based on gold-standard science and free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control.
Would be hilarious if his new "gold standard" science buddies made exactly the same recommendations as WHO for vaccines. Because science. Bobby is sure to interfere so they don't. Can't have reality contradict the crazy.
 
So the kiddies can give the virus to the more vulnerable members of the family? Check.

Not a very well-thought-out policy.
Jonathan Howard's book "We Want Them Infected" left me with the impression that several of the people who are now in authority believed and repeatedly said that the risk of death was near zero for children. His book also indicated that the "focused protection" for elderly and other vulnerable people was not completely thought through. It was related to the Great Barrington Declaration, to make a long story short.
 
Last edited:
After I read the World Health Organization's 2022 report on fungal pathogens, I came away with a very positive impression of their work. With respect to the WHO, I am not aware of any evidence of corruption or totalitarian control.
 
Last edited:
NPR reported, ""It's really concerning," Dr. Sean O'Leary, who chairs the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Infectious Diseases, told NPR. "I think it's going to be confusing not only for parents but also for public health professionals and medical professionals as well. This takes away choice." Dr. Steven J. Fleischman, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists said his organization is "extremely disappointed" by the removal of the recommendation for COVID shots during pregnancy."

The New York Times reported, "It’s true that for many children, a case of Covid will be inconsequential. They might have a runny nose, a cough or other mild symptoms, if any at all, and bounce back within a few days. But some children do become seriously ill and, in rare cases, die from their infections. And data shows that over one million U.S. children have developed long Covid...The risk is higher for babies younger than 6 months. From October 2022 to April 2024, young infants were more likely to be hospitalized than any other age group apart from adults 75 and older...On a recent episode of “Dr. Phil Primetime,” Mr. Kennedy claimed that people who died from Covid “were so sick that they were basically hanging from a cliff, and Covid came along and stamped on their fingers and dropped them off.”"
 
Last edited:
If I understand correctly, it sounds as if the policy is for children to be infected with the virus as their first exposure to an antigen.See my comment #1675. It also sounds as if the most recent decisions represent a deviation from the standard procedure of who makes them. What am I missing here?
They're just implementing the Barrington ideology.
 
After I read the World Health Organization's 2022 report on fungal pathogens, I came away with a very positive impression of their work. With respect to the WHO, I am not aware of any evidence of corruption or totalitarian control.
The WHO has had to be careful about criticising TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) which is why you can find it recommended for some treatments. There was a thread about this here many years ago.
 
Secretary Kennedy
@SecKennedy
I had a wonderful meeting with Argentine President @JMilei about our nations’ mutual withdrawal from the WHO and the creation of an alternative international health system based on gold-standard science and free from totalitarian impulses, corruption, and political control.
He forgot the "Aryan" just after gold-standard.
 
Politico reported, "Speaking on the “Ultimate Human” podcast, Kennedy said the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet, three of the most influential medical journals in the world, were “corrupt” and publish studies funded and approved by pharmaceutical companies. “Unless those journals change dramatically, we are going to stop NIH scientists from publishing in them and we’re going to create our own journals in-house,” he said, referring to the National Institutes of Health, an HHS agency that is the world’s largest funder of health research....It [the MAHA report] also comes after both JAMA and the NEJM received letters from the Department of Justice probing them for partisanship."

Politico had previously reported that in April RFK Jr. visited the FDA: "Over the course of 40 minutes, Kennedy, in largely off-the-cuff remarks, asserted that the “Deep State” is real, referenced past CIA experiments on human mind control and accused the employees he was speaking to of becoming a “sock puppet” of the industries they regulate."

At SBM David Weinberg wrote, "Rethinking Medications: Truth, Power, and the Drugs You Take by [Professor] Jerry Avorn presents a critical appraisal of the state of the prescription medications in the United States. It explores the complex relationships among drug companies, regulators, prescribers, academics, and patients. The book is part history of US drug regulation, part critique of the status quo, and finally, a roadmap for a better path forward...This is an important book for our time. Dr. Avorn builds his case skillfully and litigates his recommendations for reform persuasively. It is appropriate reading for medical professionals, policy makers, pharmaceutical professionals, and healthcare consumers. Highly recommended!"
 
Last edited:
MedPageToday reported, ""There are hundreds of thousands of people who rely on these vaccines," said Saltzman, 71, of Sacramento, California [a retired physician]. "For people who are immunocompromised, if there aren't enough people vaccinated, we lose the ring that's protecting us. We're totally vulnerable."...Current federal regulators say there is no high-quality evidence showing that vaccinating healthy people, including health workers who are near or around immunocompromised people, provides an additional benefit. "It is possible, actually, that such approvals and strategies provide false reassurance and lead to increased harms," [Dr. Vinay] Prasad said."
 
Last edited:
At Unbiased Science Jess Steier and others wrote, "This announcement is unprecedented. It bypassed every established scientific and administrative process typically involved in changing national vaccine policy. There was no consultation with the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). No formal recommendations were issued. No public health agencies released supporting documentation. As of Tuesday morning, the CDC’s website still reflected previous guidance recommending COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and for children aged 6 months and older."
 
On 23 May the New York Times reported, "Experts are concerned about how the plan could affect healthy infants and toddlers; the C.D.C. currently recommends that they get a series of Covid shots starting at 6 months. This is because very young children are at higher risk of serious illness. The hospitalization risk for children from birth to 6 months is on par with the risk faced by people who are 65 to 74 years old, and there is also an elevated risk of hospitalization for children up to 2 years old, said Dr. Sean O’Leary, a vaccine expert for the American Academy of Pediatrics. The youngest infants can be covered by immunity from their mothers."
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom