“Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.”
Why continue to
lie about everything?
Why pretend that
"the world has moved on," as in, 'there's no pandemic, and if there is, it is mild, and if it isn't mild, it's only not mild when old people get it, and when it kills children, they must have been immune-compromised or something else must be wrong with them, so they're probably better off dead'?
Why continue to claim that the virus is mild? That it's just like the common cold or the flue when it obviously isn't?
Why claim that people with Long Covid are hypochondriacs?
You may not have noticed, but my
alleged screeching usually consist of nothing but a few indirect quotations, i.e. The Atheist's screeching, plus an awful lot of facts that show what the pandemic is - including that it obviously
isn't over.
Unlike you and The Atheist, I mainly post facts, like in
post 996, and those fact show that the pandemic isn't over, even though you prefer to pretend that
"the world" has moved on - as if a pandemic stops when people stop
believing that there is a pandemic. The virus doesn't give a **** what you believe.
The Atheist prefers to post claims only, and most of those claims are nothing but lies.
What is the point of that? Why pretend that the pandemic is over?
Why didn't marting follow up on his predictions about his local version of the pandemic?
Why didn't
he tell us how far off the mark his San Diego predictions were? Why did
I have to do that instead, in
post 929?
Marting recently gave us an obvious hint in
the other thread: He gets his pandemic information from people who have been wrong about the pandemic since day one, people like Vinay Prasad and ZDoggMD, the latter a current COVID-19 patient. They have both evolved into vaccine skeptics during the pandemic, and it is no coincidence that The Atheist has, too.
This is what actual skeptics (unlike 'vaccine skeptics' or 'climate skeptics') write about the people who spread disinformation about the pandemic, people like
Vinay Prasad (Brownstone Institute):
An Open Letter to ZDoggMD (Science-Based Medicine, Jan 21, 2022)
Dr. Vinay Prasad Pretends to Admit Error: I Was Optimistic That Vaccination Would Halt the Spread of the Virus—I Was Wrong. (Science-Based Medicine, May 11, 2024)
Dr. Vinay Prasad: It’s “Good” That Parents Who Want To Vaccinate Their Kids Against COVID Get Reported To Child Protective Services (Science-Based Medicine, April 14, 2024)
Dr. Vinay Prasad vs. a VAERS study finding more reports of vaccine injury in red states (Science-Based Medicine, April 8, 2024)
I Agree with Dr. Vinay Prasad: It’s Entirely Predictable That More Parents Don’t Want Routine Vaccination for Their Kids (Science-Based Medicine, Nov 25, 2023)
Dr. Vinay Prasad fully embraces the antivax message of “do not comply” (Science-Based Medicine, Sep 11, 2023)
Dr. Vinay Prasad echoes a common antivax trope that portrays concern about a deadly disease as irrational fear (Science-Based Medicine, Sep 19, 2022)
Dr. Vinay Prasad: “Public Health’s (Mis)Truth Problem” (Science-Based Medicine, Feb 27, 2022)
ETA: In his post about Vinay Prasad and ZDoggMD, marting also mentions Paul Offit, who used to be a brilliant vaccine scientist. 90 percent of what I knew about vaccines before the pandemic came from reading Offit's Vaccinted (Goodreads), which I can still recommend.
However, as Jonathan Howard writes, Offit is
"not infallible." (Nobody is, obviously.):
At the very start of the pandemic he predicted that COVID-19 would cause less than “one-tenth of the damage that influenza causes every year in the United States”. With humility and humor, he soon acknowledged his error saying, “If you’re going to be wrong, be wrong in front of millions of people. Make a complete ass of yourself”. This differentiates him from several other people who also underestimated the virus at that time. It is why I still trust him.
Today however, Dr. Offit shares something in common with many of the contrarian doctors I’ve criticized previously. They all feel young, healthy people, males in particular, would not benefit from a booster vaccine (here and here). Dr. Offit advised his own young son not to get a booster as “he believes that his son is well protected against serious illness with two shots, so a third just isn’t necessary”. This prompted one doctor and critic of our site to say:
"Now just waiting for the @ScienceBasedMed crowd to call Paul Offit an anti-vaxxer. Wait for it…"
I Won’t Call Dr. Paul Offit an Anti-Vaxxer (Science-Based Medicine, Jan 23, 2022)
Since January 2022, there have been many studies of the efficacy and side effects of the mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, some of them fairly recent. I don't know what Offit's attitude is today, but I assume that his skepticism of the expediency of boosters for young people is what makes him interesting to people like ZDoggMD - and marting and The Atheist. ZDoggMD might have fared much better if he had been boosted - like his wife.