• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Does God like to kill children

The Traveler

Banned
Joined
Jul 30, 2021
Messages
196
The Progressive Grab bag of Deception.
In our current time and society it has become fashionable to heap as much disparagement upon the idea of God as possible. The arguments follow the predictable paths;

1) Old superstition of backward cultures. Yet the gifts of the spirit still manifest today and for some reason there seems to be no likewise ridicule of the kingdom of Satan. Maybe it has something to do with whom the progressives fear most. Hence I refer to them as regressive.
Edited by zooterkin: 
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve read all the Harry Potter books and can find nothing to substantiate your claims.
 
Ok...let me give this a try. The question is moot since you have yet to prove that an entity like god exists. And there is definitely a strong suggestion that the authors of the scriptures did not have any qualms with killing kids as long as it aligned with their own ideas of morality.
 
The Christian bible is a heavily edited, multiply translated propaganda piece. So referring to it as a source of fact is pretty silly, frankly. Then using those references to support arguments about important topics is even sillier. So silly that it is laughable. And pointless.
 
More fundie gibberish, eh?

If I'd spouted this level of nonsense in the few church membership classes I attended I would have been kicked out even quicker than I left of my own volition.
 
The Progressive Grab bag of Deception.
In our current time and society it has become fashionable to heap as much disparagement upon the idea of God as possible. The arguments follow the predictable paths;

1) Old superstition of backward cultures. Yet the gifts of the spirit still manifest today and for some reason there seems to be no likewise ridicule of the kingdom of Satan. Maybe it has something to do with whom the progressives fear most. Hence I refer to them as regressive.
Stop press. Satan, like God is not real.
2) Science and the theory of evolution. Big subject all on its own. Yet the whole reason for sexual reproduction is to provide a self correcting mechanism to prevent species drift so the concept of progressing mutations leading to evolution falls away. But don’t proclaim that in public or the learned masses go into a frenzy in defence of their sacred cow.
What evidence do you have that the reason for sexual reproduction is to prevent species drift?
3) The religious are intolerant haters and refuse to embrace gays and witches and Satanists etc. This is just a trap hatched in the depths of hell itself.

The whole idea is to present the Christians with subject matter that they cannot embrace without defiling the tenants of their own faith, and then make demands that they accept these perversions, with the result they have to become either apostates or be condemned as haters.
Many Christians have no problem with homosexuality. That said the demand is not that Christians embrace homosexuality. The demand is simply that you don't force your intolerance on others.

Oh there is no hell either.
Yet the Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists also reject these behaviours but not a single word in condemnation is raised against them. That’s because this trap was only intended for the Christian God, not the others. Obviously the progressive globalists believe that Lucifer, Enlil, Azazel and Astaroth are all OK by them . Good luck with that.

Atheist's tend not to believe in fantasy characters.
I am going to examine each one of those..... Drivel snipped
The God of the Old Testament is an nasty little wanker with few if any redeeming features. Christianity gave up defending it 1800 years ago. Your pathetic justification is not going to convince people otherwise.
 
Last edited:
In our current time and society it has become fashionable to heap as much disparagement upon the idea of God as possible.
What god(s), where?
 
Last edited:
Quote:
2) Science and the theory of evolution. Big subject all on its own. Yet the whole reason for sexual reproduction is to provide a self correcting mechanism to prevent species drift so the concept of progressing mutations leading to evolution falls away. But don’t proclaim that in public or the learned masses go into a frenzy in defence of their sacred cow.
What evidence do you have that the reason for sexual reproduction is to prevent species drift?

In fact, in so far as sexual reproduction can be said to have a "reason," it's to increase variation rather than to restrict it. From Wikipedia:

Prior to the advent of sexual reproduction, the adaptation process whereby genes would change from one generation to the next (genetic mutation) happened very slowly and randomly. Sex evolved as an extremely efficient mechanism for producing variation, and this had the major advantage of enabling organisms to adapt to changing environments.

The whole problem with arguing against religious people though, is that they have the advantage of being able to make categorical statements like "the whole reason for sexual reproduction is to provide a self correcting mechanism to prevent species drift" without ever feeling any need to bother to back them up. Theology is argument by fiat rather than evidence.
 
Religious beliefs are like turds. You do good business when you rid yourself of them. (To paraphrase Edward Long Shanks).
 
The "tenants" of their religion.

God damn me for who I sound like, but sometimes you just gotta love the poorly educated!
 
Does god like to kill children? On planet Earth god likes to kill every living thing. Just ask Noah and his inbreeds. Who god doesn't like to kill is Satan, for without Satan there is no antagonist for god to blame for shoddy divine storytelling. I am unable to vouch for the rest of the universe.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom