I should put these in categories of laughable, SBAR (stupid beyond all reason), or here it is already addressed and/or 'exactly'.
... It's almost like the actual credibility of the information isn't the primary consideration, and you're just making excuses to dismiss information you don't like and to amplify information you do.
I'm pretty sure this is a common theme.
Very believable laptop:
-NY Post
-Daily mail
-Foxnews
-Bannon, Breitbart
“Hunter Biden’s lawyer has come to us both with phone calls and with emails saying, ‘Hey, I’ve got to get the hard drive back,’” Bannon told Sky News on Sunday.
It's SBAR. Giuliani couldn't find anyone interested except the NY Post.
... When Trump claims, with zero evidence, that Hunter Biden beat a hooker to death with a bottle of champagne, he knows that the "Is it Champagne or is it just sparkling wine?" debate will occur and both sides will claim victory over it even if the whole setup original question is laughably false.
The talking heads know we as a society will nitpick the nuance of a pointless question.
Exactly and so we are having this conversation.
A journalist posted a scan of the receipt and a different signature of Biden on twitter.
here :
https://twitter.com/ScottMStedman/status/1318384991525502977
Comparing them upside down is interesting, my completely amateur analysis is these are very much not from the same person.
It's absurdly not even close. But the point is, keep the story in the news feed.
Rudy Giuliani said Biden was drunk when he came in. The repair guy said he wasn't sure Biden ever came in because he can't see. I'm not sure how those two get reconciled without resorting to "bald faced lie".
Fox are now reporting that they have confirmed the story though...?
I'm not disputing that, only saying that I didn't know that before, and that the article should not have been published the way it was, and curious why the Biden law team didn't do more to prevent publication.
My guess now is that they saw how much this would be an own-goal for Trump and the Post.
Exactly, and given the point isn't to present a credible story, the point is to present the SBAR nonsense. Any engagement by Biden is a bonus.
They claim to have "sources" saying that Big Guy is Joe.
They also claim that they spoke to one of the people who was copied on the email, who confirmed its authenticity.
However, they don't claim that the "sources" and the people copied on the email are the same.
"Sources" could be Giuliani or Bannon, for all we know.
Pretty sure we do know, Giuliani is the source and maybe the Russians helped him out.
See Firestone's email. Fox claim to have been in touch with a recipient of one of the emails.
No where does it say the person wasn't a space alien reptoid either.
This means we need to be prepared to be invaded by the space alien reptoid fleet.
Bingo!
PS - any word on Barr's condition?
I mean Covid, not his transformation into a space alien reptoid.
He has an appearance scheduled Thursday. We'll see.
*Wheels the chalkboard into the room...*
Okay so.... the evil Jewish cabal... in associations with the NWO (both the evil global conspiracy and the 90s Wrestling Stable)... built the Denver Airport... as a place to hide Hillary's E-mail server... to cover up the fact the she killed Vince Foster... to prevent him from talking about her secret underground pizza parlor child sex dungeon... and the pieces that connect the dots where all on Hunter Biden's laptop.
I think you're on to something here.
The FBI had better come out with some details soon, or in your scenario, they will have known about a Russian plan to influence the election a year out and silently let it run its course.
Oh really.
Well I have a shoe box in my closet that could implicate you in the Black Dahlia murders.
We're a lot of proven facts down the ladder from "Joe Biden did anything."
But yes I know let's argue about the bottle that Hunter Biden didn't beat a hooker to death was champagne or sparkling whine (pun intended.)
I love how Hunter is depicted both as an utterly unreliable crackhead pedophile *and* a highly credible reporter of his dad’s alleged corruption.
Almost always the case with CTs.
They very clearly brief people about ongoing investigations. They briefed Trump and Obama about the Steele dossier while that was an ongoing investigation. We've been hearing about them briefing Obama about Flynn before that became an active investigation.
The way we are talking about this, it's like one of those nature documentaries where some innocent baby gazelle is about to be killed by a pack of hyenas and the film crew do nothing because they have vowed not to interfere in the natural order. I don't believe the FBI takes that same approach with foreign election interference.
I'm pretty sure such meetings are confidential and unlike Trump, Biden respects that confidentiality.
In that case, a new federal agency needs to be set up to protect and defend the United States against terrorist and foreign intelligence threats.
They weren't too bad before Trump stepped in to make the top leaders his ass-kissing minions. Wray seems to be holding his own for now.
Sure, but they then apparently decided not to tell him about this actual attempt. If I know specifically that your neighbour is a homicidal maniac, has found the spare key to your house and has been muttering about killing you.... giving you a generalized warning that there are a lot of dangerous people about and your wife shouldn't leave the key under the mat is wilfully non-specific.
If someone's life was at risk, the FBI would move in. Your analogy is SBAR.
The information about the laptop had not been spread far and wide. At the moment it seems like the FBI knew about it for 10 months and allowed it to develop into a trap for either Biden or Trump.
You're still operating on an SBAR premise.
The evidence exists. It's just that the current president not only ignores it, he does his best to discredit it if it implicates any of his dictator buddies.
And this is the problem with bothering to discredit the story.
It's hard to credit that something this laughable is the actual October Surprise. Misdirection, surely?
You'd think he could have done better if he wanted to make something up.
Trump sent the idiot Giuliani because Trump cannot been seen as directly involved. But maybe Trump asked the Russians to make this laptop nonsense up and they did a half-assed job too.
