Judge's son gunned down, hitman found dead in car

[Vixen]

Nice dodging "elaborate," and your version of motive has no facts in evidence.

As of the time of the murder it was a salient issue. Your claim that I just it up is patently untrue.

Can't make this up! #DeutscheBank executive who signed off on $2 B of #Trump loans committed suicide. His wife died of unknown cause. Judge #Salas son is killed & killer with #russian past commits suicide!Face screaming in fear
#WTP2020 #wtpTEAM #wtpEBRC #onev1 #wtpSenate

https://twitter.com/CallingSpade/status/1285434835343937536?s=20

ARMA will find those who sponsored this professional hit #Salas

https://twitter.com/574Tribes/status/1290447144407752705?s=20

 

[Babbylonian]

Tweets from random Twitter accounts are now evidence? Christ, that would be like citing posts from a troll on a board like 8chan/kun...

 

[Vixen]

Tweets from random Twitter accounts are now evidence? Christ, that would be like citing posts from a troll on a board like 8chan/kun...

There won't be any evidence as the case is closed. Suicide-homicide. End of.

You won't find any evidence in a chat forum, I'm afraid, it would need to go to court for it to be weighed up.

 

[Babbylonian]

There won't be any evidence as the case is closed. Suicide-homicide. End of.

You won't find any evidence in a chat forum, I'm afraid, it would need to go to court for it to be weighed up.

Do you not know what "evidence" is? Is that what's causing you all this difficulty?

No, evidence doesn't only exist when it is offered in a court. If that was true, there would be no evidence that I am currently chewing Trident gum. However, if someone called upon me to prove that I was doing so, I could show them the gum in my mouth and the package in which the gum was previously kept before chewing. Even in a month, after chewing all the gum and throwing away the package, I could still provide at least circumstantial evidence that I was chewing Trident gum in that I have an itemized receipt from when it was purchased.

What I would not offer as evidence of my claim is a tweet from some random slob on the Internet that says gum was found in a local garbage dump.

 

[JesseCuster]

Planning a calculated cold blooded murder based purely on ideology and 'nothing personal' I would say that is an act of great deliberation.

You said it was an "elaborate plot involving costume", that was what the post you're responding to was addressing. Whether it involved deliberation or not was not under discussion. You're not addressing what was actually written.

Getting your hands on a FedEx uniform does not involved anything elaborate.

 

[JesseCuster]

I can say that because the title of the topic is: 'Judge's son gunned down, hitman found dead in car', therefore, I can proceed to discuss it.

What are you talking about? I never said what you could or couldn't discuss. Did you respond to the wrong post or soemthing?

As of the time of the murder there were concerns.

Murder is generally a concerning issue. I don't think that's controversial.

You can wait until Fox News or Murdoch newspapers explains it to you and avoid forums (look up the meaning of the word 'forum') or you can discuss issues that interest you here.

I don't read any newspapers and I don't watch Fox News. I know what the word 'forum' means. I have genuinely no idea what you're getting at here.

Fact is, this guy was connected to Russian intelligence and the Judge had just been appointed to oversee the Deutsche Bank case.

You said he was involved in "semi-espionage", was probably involved in espionage, was involved in setting up intelligence systems for the Russians and was possibly working as a double agent. You also said you're only reporting what the media is reporting. You're not reporting what the media is saying, you're making fantastical extrapolations based upon his resume on his website.

Where did the media report that he was involved in semi-espionage or espionage? What's the evidence that he was working as a double agent? Where did the media report that he worked setting up intelligence systems for the Russians?

 

[smartcooky]

Rubbish.

Rubbish yerself. You are making a stupid game out of the murder of someone so that you can spout some batcrap loony conspiracy theory - a complete fantasy that exists only in your head, and the heads of other tinfoil hat wearers.

You're just like those who claim Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon bombing and other terrorist attacks were all faked, and that the dead and wounded are all "vicsims" - showing a total lack of empathy for the families of those whose lives were cut short. You disgust me.

Virtue signalling noted.

It is not "virtue signalling" to empathize with the family murder victims!

 

[Craig4]

There won't be any evidence as the case is closed. Suicide-homicide. End of.

You won't find any evidence in a chat forum, I'm afraid, it would need to go to court for it to be weighed up.

Has the possibility that the FBI and the Marshals checked known associates, phone records, the murder's activities for the days leading up to the event and found he acted alone? It's just possible that the Justice Department is too busy to be bothered with the crank lobby and don't feel the need explain themselves to those who would make a game of Clue out of a horrible murder.

 

[Babbylonian]

Has the possibility that the FBI and the Marshals checked known associates, phone records, the murder's activities for the days leading up to the event and found he acted alone? It's just possible that the Justice Department is too busy to be bothered with the crank lobby and don't feel the need explain themselves to those who would make a game of Clue out of a horrible murder.

A game of Clue has actual goals that players are trying to complete. Conspiracy theorists have no goals. They're just in it to spray their feces everywhere and then lament how crappy the world is.

 

[Craig4]

A game of Clue has actual goals that players are trying to complete. Conspiracy theorists have no goals. They're just in it to spray their feces everywhere and then lament how crappy the world is.

I take your point. I was just looking for something new after I'd used a line about her belief that the world is organized like it's a summer action thriller a few times.

 

[Babbylonian]

I take your point. I was just looking for something new after I'd used a line about her belief that the world is organized like it's a summer action thriller a few times.

What, you think I would've posted the first sentence if I didn't have something scatological queued up?

 

[smartcooky]

A game of Clue has actual goals that players are trying to complete. Conspiracy theorists have no goals. They're just in it to spray their feces everywhere and then lament how crappy the world is.

"Remember that the goal of conspiracy rhetoric is to bog down the discussion, not to make progress toward a solution"
- Jay Utah

 

[Vixen]

Rubbish yerself. You are making a stupid game out of the murder of someone so that you can spout some batcrap loony conspiracy theory - a complete fantasy that exists only in your head, and the heads of other tinfoil hat wearers.

You're just like those who claim Sandy Hook, the Boston Marathon bombing and other terrorist attacks were all faked, and that the dead and wounded are all "vicsims" - showing a total lack of empathy for the families of those whose lives were cut short. You disgust me.



It is not "virtue signalling" to empathize with the family murder victims!

This was originally posted in social and current affairs so have a go at the person who moved it to conspiracy theory.

Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon faked? I have never claimed anything of the sort. I am an independent thinker so your attempt to lump me in with some arbitrary group is laughable.

The claim that you especially empathise with the Salas family and I do not is so insincere. It is a pathetic argument and I am surprised at you.

 

[Jim_MDP]

This was originally posted in social and current affairs so have a go at the person who moved it to conspiracy theory.



Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon faked? I have never claimed anything of the sort. I am an independent thinker so your attempt to lump me in with some arbitrary group is laughable.



The claim that you especially empathise with the Salas family and I do not is so insincere. It is a pathetic argument and I am surprised at you.

You went full "grassy knoll" in the Opening post... don't blame anyone else for the move.
[emoji21]

 

[RedStapler]

Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon faked? I have never claimed anything of the sort. I am an independent thinker so your attempt to lump me in with some arbitrary group is laughable.

You don't believe in 2 specific Cts? What about all the other ones?

 

[Vixen]

You don't believe in 2 specific Cts? What about all the other ones?

Taking an interest in current affairs is not conspiracy theory. I have always been interested in True Crime and so-called 'mysteries'. You can call it conspiracy theory, I call it getting to the bottom of events which are ipso facto not in pllain sight, being as they are criminal and by nature furtive, hidden and evasive. You are quite welcome to wait and see what Fox News or Murdoch newspapers have to say about anything and I am perfectly entitled to make my own enquiries and do my own research as I see fit. I saw one of the twin towers seeming to implode live with my own eyes so I see nothing untoward in discussing why it looked that way. If you hate so-called conspiracy theory as you claim such curiosity is, then you are not obliged to partake of any debate in these matters.

If you believe I have acted inappropriately then provide specific examples of it or click the little triangle in the left hand side to complain if as you claim it breaches all kinds of ethics and offends your sensibilities.


In the meantime, I shall carry on taking an interest in this particular crime.

 

[smartcooky]

This was originally posted in social and current affairs so have a go at the person who moved it to conspiracy theory.

It got moved to where it belonged, in with all the other loony CT stuff on this forum.

Sandy Hook and the Boston Marathon faked? I have never claimed anything of the sort.

I never said you did, What is DID say was that your spouting of this nonsense (to wit "Ex-Russian agent murdered Judge's son") puts you, as far as I am concerned, in with the same bunch of CT loonies.

I am an independent thinker.

Bwahahaha!!!

The claim that you especially empathise with the Salas family and I do not is so insincere. It is a pathetic argument and I am surprised at you.

Why are you touting CT crap then?

 

[smartcooky]

You don't believe in 2 specific Cts? What about all the other ones?

Yup... "body of work" is an actual thing here!!

 

[Cosmic Yak]

Taking an interest in current affairs is not conspiracy theory. I have always been interested in True Crime and so-called 'mysteries'. You can call it conspiracy theory, I call it getting to the bottom of events which are ipso facto not in pllain sight, being as they are criminal and by nature furtive, hidden and evasive.

You can call it that. I call it making stuff up on the fly.
Can you name any particular event that your technique of concocting wild fantasies has got you to the bottom of?

You are quite welcome to wait and see what Fox News or Murdoch newspapers have to say about anything

This is your new thing for the day, presumably. Three times posted, and probably not the last. It would perhaps work better (i.e. at all) if anyone here with the exception of Bubba, was actually reliant on Fox News or the Murdoch press for all of their information.

and I am perfectly entitled to make my own enquiries and do my own research as I see fit.

Baseless speculation is not research.

I saw one of the twin towers seeming to implode live with my own eyes so I see nothing untoward in discussing why it looked that way.

And here's a perfect example. Is this what you call research? Did you follow up this impression with any more research, or is that it?

If you hate so-called conspiracy theory as you claim such curiosity is, then you are not obliged to partake of any debate in these matters.

If you believe I have acted inappropriately then provide specific examples of it or click the little triangle in the left hand side to complain if as you claim it breaches all kinds of ethics and offends your sensibilities.

Strawman, strawman, strawman.

In the meantime, I shall carry on taking an interest in this particular crime.

Your breathless fantasies about Mafia hitmen and Russian agents are certainly of interest.
Their value as fact-finding endeavours is less certain.

 

[Vixen]

You can call it that. I call it making stuff up on the fly.
Can you name any particular event that your technique of concocting wild fantasies has got you to the bottom of?



This is your new thing for the day, presumably. Three times posted, and probably not the last. It would perhaps work better (i.e. at all) if anyone here with the exception of Bubba, was actually reliant on Fox News or the Murdoch press for all of their information.



Baseless speculation is not research.



And here's a perfect example. Is this what you call research? Did you follow up this impression with any more research, or is that it?



Strawman, strawman, strawman.



Your breathless fantasies about Mafia hitmen and Russian agents are certainly of interest.
Their value as fact-finding endeavours is less certain.

I get that you and millions of others could not give a darn about what happened on 9/11 but I and many others followed the story closely. If you are intolerant of people following news stories as they develop I can't see how that is my problem.

The topic here is 'Judge's son gunned down, hitman found dead in car'. If you have no wish to discuss it then kindly refrain from trying to censor others from doing so.