The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2016
- Messages
- 32,608
A narrative doesn't have to be true, it just has to feel true.
https://youtu.be/vsbBTm40YVc?t=3060 (through to 53:40-ish)
The narrative only has to tap into something real. The rust belt was neglected to into the hell that it is and then on top of that they are the ones paying for rich elite coasters to continue having caviar and coke on yachts to celebrate their patents on all the robots that will soon be replacing them. Naming Democrats as the guilty is just part of how using angry people works, sadly. Clinton signed NAFTA, all right or wrongs aside (believe me, I KNOW), that's our albatross forever.
I mean you could tell the Gary from Gary, Indiana story and stop for prompts at several points and probably get people to figure it out it is so ingrained and natural. I'm in flyover country near those states and have taken a few train rides that left vivid imprints in my memory since the rail lines go right past a whole row of deteriorating factories and warehouses with a little township in the distance about every 20 minutes or so.
ok, let's reverse this.
How was the East Coast, or Silicon Valley, or plenty of other thriving places in the US favored over the Rust Belt? Was there some government initiative that helped there but not elsewhere? Were critical resources withheld?
Is there any policy that caused the decline or prevented the recovery?
I think there are factors at play beyond politics, and for some reason, one party gets more blame than the other, when probably neither could have realistically done much to prevent it.
And economists agree that NAFTA helped US farmers, but of course some more than others.
Last edited: