Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

Only the most recent.

by the way, if you acknowledge that " that human rights abuses exist in China on a large scale" it really puts into perspective the specious attacks on the posters in this thread .

Oh yeah human rights abuses exist in China on a large scale, so lets bitterly complain about TBD. Thread in a nutshell.

Don't play dumb. Even a fan of the Paedophiles Church can realize that you are being attacked in this forum not for claiming that human rights are being violated in China, but for claiming that atheism is the cause. We're not stupid, man.

And Trump's gang would do better worring about human rights in Mexico's border or Arabia Saudi that are their direct responsibility. For the human rights violators it is easy to launch smoke courtains. As the Paedophiles Church.
 
fascinating, the list of the real bad guys keeps on growing, now it is human rights watch's turn in the barrel.

I have already explained what i am doing, i have explained what Human Rights watch has done. I humbly apologize for not being able to do more.

Other than cheerleading and snark, what are you doing to stop the human rights abuses in China? Because right now it seems that all the atheists are doing is defending their fellow travelers' human rights abuses.

Reminds me of the Communist Party in the US while Stalin and the League of Militant Atheists were executing Orthodox Clergy in the USSR.

Anyone else have any idea of what other members of the G20 are doing?

Oh well, I tried.

Not surprised that the Atheist Human Rights Abuse supporters didn't respond.
 
Oh well, I tried.

Not surprised that the Atheist Human Rights Abuse supporters didn't respond.

Please name these supporters.

In the mean time, this showed up in my inbox. Bolding by me:

Hello,
Meaning and Action, two themes to reflect on this week.

The results of a Pew study came out this week discussing what particular things Americans ascribe as adding meaning to their lives. In the aggregate, "family" and "career" were found to provide 69 and 34 percent of Americans meaning respectively--as opposed to "Spirituality and faith" which trailed in fourth at 20% (with "spending time with family" to provide the "most important source of meaning").

Empirically, we care more about those in the here and now than in the hereafter. This can become difficult with distance. Those who are far, or who are different may cross your mind with less frequency, but there is a certain degree of urgency.

Right now, out of the long list of ongoing human rights crises, two in particular come within our particular sphere of awareness as a group (most individuals reading this being secular-advocates and/or Humanists). This involves the mass-detention of large groups of people based upon ethno-religious identity.

The Uighur minority in western China is currently facing incredible persecution as are the Rohingya people in northern Myanmar. This is not on the scale of hundreds, or of thousands, but of millions.

We are drafting two letters two advocate the amelioration of this horrible situation, as well as two additional letters regarding a government-sponsored "heresy-reporting" app in Indonesia, and the Trump Administration's attempts to define gender as biological sex at birth.


Our monthly phone call will resume on the first Thursday of January (3rd) at 12 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (US). We will discuss these four matters.

We have also added to the quantity of our weekly newsletter.

Please mark your calendar for the first call in January, and look for the first of the four letters in next week's bulletin.


Have a great week,

sincerely,



Jason Frye, CEO
Secular Policy Institute

Who they are:

https://secularpolicyinstitute.net/

There is some abuse in this thread. But it is not coming from the Atheists.
 
Well it is a claim that is largely unsubstantiated

Can you give an example? Because we have asked thousand times the Big Dog for it, but he won't give us one single. Some comment defending the Chinese regime? All he does is repeat over and over again the comment of a person who has already explained to him a hundred times that he did not intend to exonerate the Chinese government of serious abuses against the population. So what is it all about?
 
Last edited:
Oh well, I tried.

Not surprised that the Atheist Human Rights Abuse supporters didn't respond.

Still not much reply, although it is gratifying to see that the secular society has at least recognized the extent of the problem.

Any other Nations doing anything?

Oh well, I suspect I should be happy that most atheists on this site have confined their cheerleading to the internet and not volunteered for church destroying duties in China.
 
Why do you keep lying?

I am not, of course, unless you are suggesting that the atheists have not confined themselves to cheerleading on the internet and have taken up the cudgels to destroy churches like their fellow atheist travelers have done in Red China?
 
I am not, of course, unless you are suggesting that the atheists have not confined themselves to cheerleading on the internet and have taken up the cudgels to destroy churches like their fellow atheist travelers have done in Red China?

You have made a claim that can be proven. You state that:

most atheists on this site have confined their cheerleading to the internet

This is a quantifiable and verifiable claim. If you are not lying then provide evidence that most atheists on this site are cheerleading about the actions of the government in China. Present the numbers. Do not just post one quote from one person. If you do that we will have positive evidence that you are lying. Your claim is MOST ATHEISTS. Prove it or you are lying.
 
You have made a claim that can be proven. You state that:



This is a quantifiable and verifiable claim. If you are not lying then provide evidence that most atheists on this site are cheerleading about the actions of the government in China. Present the numbers. Do not just post one quote from one person. If you do that we will have positive evidence that you are lying. Your claim is MOST ATHEISTS. Prove it or you are lying.

The cheerleading speaks for itself, but I am of course intrigued at your suggestion that the cheerleading is not confined to the internet.

Do you evidence for that claim or are you lying?
 
The cheerleading speaks for itself, but I am of course intrigued at your suggestion that the cheerleading is not confined to the internet.

Do you evidence for that claim or are you lying?

I've suggested nothing and that is another lie on your part.

So you will not defend your claim? Then you are a liar.

It would be easy for you to do. List the names of those participating that you think are atheists and then post where they cheerleaded the actions of the Chinese government. I believe there may be one or two persons that did that but since the number of people here far greater then you have to get past half of them to prove your case.

Go ahead and get started. I look forward to you proving me wrong about you being a liar.
 
There there, tbd, don't let Doubt or anybody else bully you. I for one have cheered the Chinese for their disgusted reaction to the brain-numbed bleevers. You know I have.

You can quote me as much as you like. Go right ahead. You can improve on my posts all you want, too. All writers need an editor, and you can be mine.

'Scuse me, gotta go meet with some fellas to terrorlize a secret RCC cell
down the street. Hey, at least we've driven the buggers underground!
 
I've suggested nothing and that is another lie on your part.

So you will not defend your claim? Then you are a liar.

It would be easy for you to do. List the names of those participating that you think are atheists and then post where they cheerleaded the actions of the Chinese government. I believe there may be one or two persons that did that but since the number of people here far greater then you have to get past half of them to prove your case.

Go ahead and get started. I look forward to you proving me wrong about you being a liar.

Oh dear, baby steps.... do you agree that most atheists have confined their cheerleading, if any, to the internet?

Yes or no?

Simple question, anything other than a yes or no will be considered a lie.
 
There there, tbd, don't let Doubt or anybody else bully you. I for one have cheered the Chinese for their disgusted reaction to the brain-numbed bleevers. You know I have.

You can quote me as much as you like. Go right ahead. You can improve on my posts all you want, too. All writers need an editor, and you can be mine.

'Scuse me, gotta go meet with some fellas to terrorlize a secret RCC cell
down the street. Hey, at least we've driven the buggers underground!

Yes, thank you, and will you confirm that your cheerleading of the pogrom in China has been confined to the internet?
 
Easy sneezy

Yes, thank you, and will you confirm that your cheerleading of the pogrom in China has been confined to the internet?

See my location? It's a long way from China. All I can do is get on Al Gore's Greatest Invention here & go

TWO BITS
FOUR BITS
SIX BITS
A DOLLAR!
ALL FOR CHINA
STAND UP 'N HOLLER!

See me wave my pompom?
 

Back
Top Bottom