Atheists destroy churches, attack the faithful

See my location? It's a long way from China. All I can do is get on Al Gore's Greatest Invention here & go

TWO BITS
FOUR BITS
SIX BITS
A DOLLAR!
ALL FOR CHINA
STAND UP 'N HOLLER!

See me wave my pompom?

Thanks, your honesty is appreciated.
 
TBD: Third time of asking. Are you boycotting Chinese goods, and have you encouraged whatever church you belong to to do the same?
After all you wouldn't want to confine yourself to just cheerleading on the internet, would you?
 
Remember Westbank Piglet?

Thanks, your honesty is appreciated.

Well now, you're just as entirely and completely welcome as you can ever be.

Here's another cheer:

Rooty toot toot
Rooty toot toot.
We are the boys
From the Institute.
We don't smoke
And we don't chew
And we don't go
With girls who do.
 
OK, President Trump and Mr Xi have had a long personal conference yesterday. Seems they have reached an agreement. ... On trade relations. Not a word about human rights.

Well ...

Hans
 
Fascinating as all hell

OK, President Trump and Mr Xi have had a long personal conference yesterday. Seems they have reached an agreement. ... On trade relations. Not a word about human rights.

Well ...

Hans

K, guess that proves it. Hefty Hitler is an atheist.
 
Oh dear, baby steps.... do you agree that most atheists have confined their cheerleading, if any, to the internet?

Yes or no?

Simple question, anything other than a yes or no will be considered a lie.


To quote Dalton Trumbo:
I shall answer “Yes” or “No,” if I please to answer. I shall answer in my own words. Very many questions can be answered “Yes” or “No” only by a moron or a slave.

In this case, the Cohen/Trump tactic of accusing someone of that which you are guilty of will not work here. All though it is true that you can fool some of the people all of the time, you cannot fool a person who can think for themselves all of the time. This slimy tactic works well enough for Trump to keep his base not not well enough to gain support. The only other thing it does is cause the unjustly accused person to waste time dealing with the defection.

Your question is also unrelated to anything I said. Where the question I asked you is a direct result of a claim you made and cannot back up. Further more your question is an attempt at moving the goal post since your original lie was:

"most atheists on this site have confined their cheerleading to the internet"

Bolding by me. That you omitted this from your question is a lie by omission. Nobody here is dumb enough to fall for that. You have tried to cover up a lie with another lie and a deflection.

Then we have your response to Sackett. If you actual did not get that he was being facetious then I have a second bridge in New York that I would like to sell you in addition to the first one that you already purchased. Also I can finance that bridge for you at the low, low interest rate of 1% per day.

Either way you keep digging a hole for yourself. The only question left for the observers here is trying to figure out if these stupid arguments are actually supposed to support a world view so divorced from reality as to look like a comedy skit or are they an attempt to get under peoples skin. The problem being that the effort is so stupid and clumsy that no observer is going to help you out of the hole.
 
Last edited:
It would be easy for you to do. List the names of those participating that you think are atheists and then post where they cheerleaded the actions of the Chinese government. I believe there may be one or two persons that did that but since the number of people here far greater then you have to get past half of them to prove your case.

He's already tried. He stayed with only one who explained that his comment didn't mean what the Big Dog said.
So he was left with none. But he still claims that "the atheists of this forum..." etc., etc..
Liar or lack of basic discernment? Or both? Or a simple desire to annoy? I think it is the result of the indoctrination of the ChLCh (Church that Love Children). That's how things are done there.
 
State Dept official Scott Busby: "There are at least 800,000 and possibly up to a couple of million" of Uighurs and others detained in Chinese internment camps without charges, based on U.S. intel assessments.

Link to Sources:

https://twitter.com/SaveTibetOrg/status/1069982693184729089/photo/1

I'm so pleased with your concern for those poor Muslim Uighurs. Wonderful example of inter-religion solidarity. Do keep up the good work. I'm so sorry to see your president doesn't seem to give a damn.

Hans
 
Demanding that people sign papers and renounce their faith has nothing to do with Atheism?

Huh.

Sort of good try, but not a winner. Bad people crush anything they do not agree with, and sometimes they use religion to do that and sometimes they use statism to do it.
 
OK, President Trump and Mr Xi have had a long personal conference yesterday. Seems they have reached an agreement. ... On trade relations. Not a word about human rights.

Well ...

Hans

Of course the agreement is that neither supports them!!:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp:jaw-dropp
 
O god how CLEVER!

Actually I am quite certain that it was meant that Trumpf is hefty hitler…………...

Paying close attention is a virtue!!!

I borrowed "hefty hitler" from somebody or other on FaceBooger. Shouldn't have.

The rooshians & chineeze call him Agent Orange, & then they fall on their butz laffing.

Here's a jumprope song:

Yesterday
N the day before
Apple n a lemming
Come knockin on my door.
I oping tha door
Ta leddum in
They hit me onna head
Wit a ROLLIN PIN.
 
Actually I am quite certain that it was meant that Trumpf is hefty hitler…………...

Paying close attention is a virtue!!!

Ahh, you are saying that "Trumpf" (golly, that is clever!) is the "Hefty Hitler" (also clever) and not the atheist building actual concentration camps for an oppressed religious minority?

Golly folks, those human rights apologists are always a couple steps ahead in the noodle department, now aren't they?

/hoo boy...
 

Back
Top Bottom