Norman Alexander
Penultimate Amazing
All of the USA, it seems. Which includes many of my friends.How many people need to die before something changes?
All of the USA, it seems. Which includes many of my friends.How many people need to die before something changes?
Yes. But regardless, the only thing that can stop a bad illegal immigrant with a gun is a good American with a gun.Has the gun debate been settled yet?
The idea is to use registration and licensing to start reducing the supply moving into criminal circles.
As it stands, the prevalence of guns in the black market is incredibly damning of the poor state of regulation in the U.S. The great overwhelming majority of black market guns started out in legal hands.
So called "responsible" gun owners have done a terrible job of keeping guns away from criminals through poor security (allowing them to be stolen far too often and easily) and by opposition to background checks and registration that would severely reduce fraudulent transactions and straw purchases.
I don't understand the question. How does it not give them more power?
Are you suggesting that an armed populace is somehow a counterbalance to an otherwise out-of-control policeforce? This sounds like some sort of dystopian nightmare.
Are you suggesting that an armed populace is somehow a counterbalance to an otherwise out-of-control policeforce? This sounds like some sort of dystopian nightmare.
Are you suggesting that an armed populace is somehow a counterbalance to an otherwise out-of-control policeforce? This sounds like some sort of dystopian nightmare.
It's not gun owners responsibility to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. I'm skeptical that such measures would keep criminals from getting guns. There are many prescription drugs that are tightly controlled, criminals still manage to get their hands on them. The issue is the fundamental corruption of the American system. If people with money want something, chances are they will be able to get it.
They totally can.Guns and their availability are obviously part of the problem but I don't think they can explain such high figures.
When the world looks at the United States, it sees a land of exceptions: a time-tested if noisy democracy, a crusader in foreign policy, an exporter of beloved music and film.
But there is one quirk that consistently puzzles America’s fans and critics alike. Why, they ask, does it experience so many mass shootings?
Perhaps, some speculate, it is because American society is unusually violent. Or its racial divisions have frayed the bonds of society. Or its citizens lack proper mental care under a health care system that draws frequent derision abroad.
These explanations share one thing in common: Though seemingly sensible, all have been debunked by research on shootings elsewhere in the world. Instead, an ever-growing body of research consistently reaches the same conclusion.
The only variable that can explain the high rate of mass shootings in America is its astronomical number of guns.
FBI was warned about alleged shooter nearly 5 months ago, tipster says
http://www.cnn.com/2018/02/15/us/nikolas-cruz-fbi-warned/index.html
I got bad news for you dude. We are already living in a dystopian nightmare.
Except, paradoxically, the same people that are most pro-gun are usually the same that are police shooting apologists (for local and state police, FBI and ATF are jackbooted thugs, US Marshals, border patrol and homeland security are also OK).
Too soon to make any judgements, but you have to wonder how many tips like this the FBI gets, probably too many to check on them all.
And the other problem is until Cruz actually did something illegal, there is not much the FBI, or the local police can do..
You want full legalization of drugs?
Guns seem the only issue in which conservatives feel that failure to obey the law means that the law should not exist.
Dude? Did you just "dude" me?
I'm thinking it would have the opposite affect. Police would not be able to cry gun and shoot nearly as often if guns were no longer an every day thing.