• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

School shooting Florida

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aridas said:
Pointless? Not if it's for the peanut gallery or for self-indulgence.
Click to expand...

Fair call... I mean pointless from the aspect that CTs are intractable. You can never convince them they are wrong because they can always just make up new lies to keep the conspiracy real.

However, I do debate moon landing deniers (even though that is also pointless for the same reasons as above) for no other reason than to allow the peanut gallery, the lurkers and those in the bleachers to see how stupid their arguments are.
 
Aridas said:
<snip>

That's probably too low-level, given that she can still talk, supposedly. A doppleganger, maybe? Certain kinds of vampires? An alien masquerading as a victim to try to pave the way for their coming invasion? Maybe she was never actually alive in the first place, because she's a soulless heathen, as all humans are until they truly worship the Great Garbonzo and it bestows a soul upon them. There's plenty of interesting possibilities, I'd say.
Click to expand...


We can narrow the field down considerably. She doesn't want to hang out in school with a violent, Nazi-wannabe racist. That limits limits the possibilities to barely subhuman, at best.
 
quadraginta said:
We can narrow the field down considerably. She doesn't want to hang out in school with a violent, Nazi-wannabe racist. That limits limits the possibilities to barely subhuman, at best.
Click to expand...

Are you sure? If those "survivors" were actually any of the suggestions, how much can we trust anything that they say about what "she" actually wanted or not? And why would supposedly not wanting to hang out in school with a violent, Nazi-wannabe racist matter when the one who supposedly had feelings (or were soulless, so the feelings were fake) like that is no longer with us, anyways?
 
Last edited:
Aridas said:
Are you sure? If those "survivors" were actually any of the suggestions, how much can we trust anything that they say about what "she" actually wanted or not? And why would supposedly not wanting to hang out in school with a violent, Nazi-wannabe racist matter when the one who supposedly had feelings (or were soulless, so the feelings were fake) like that is no longer with us, anyways?
Click to expand...


Exactly.

That's why anything these so-called "survivors" say can be safely discounted.

Or reviled, as in the case of Ingraham.

Those advertisers are totally over-reacting.
 
cullennz said:
I'm not saying this is not true, as odd things happen, but I find it slightly difficult to believe the Russians care about a mass shooting in the US
Click to expand...
The "Russia stole our election" conspiracy theorists see Russian bots in their breakfast cereal.
 
cullennz said:
I'm not saying this is not true, as odd things happen, but I find it slightly difficult to believe the Russians care about a mass shooting in the US
Click to expand...

Their motivation seems to be to stir up trouble and discord, especially by widening partisan gaps. They know that gun control is a very divisive issue in the US. I would be surprised if they were not active in trying to stir the pot on this subject. It presents one of their best opportunities in a while.
 
CaptainHowdy said:
I said unambiguously that Emma and David are "crisis actors." I didn't say all the survivors were.
Click to expand...


I think the problem here might be that you don't understand the term "crisis actor".

In the aftermath of the killings, when David and Emma et. al. started speaking out, there were allegations flung around the interwebz that this group of students were not survivors at all, that they were not students at all. These were, according to the CTers, professional actors, brought to Parkland, Florida, to pose as students while pushing their agenda.

That is completely and totally nuts, of course, but that is what you are "unambiguously" saying about David and Emma.


You have some unorthodox views, and your posting style is filled with wild exaggerations and distortions of other people's statements, but you don't strike me as a complete and utter lunatic. Therefore, I think you have misunderstood and are misusing the term "crisis actor".
 
Can someone explain what the supposed crisis actors are supposed to be trying to achieve?

It seems a bit involved in order to improve background checks before buying guns.
 
Can someone explain what the supposed crisis actors are supposed to be trying to achieve?

Maybe they are investors who are shorting shares in gunmakers?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom