Basis of Immortality?

Kumar, define "singularity".

Read it for all your questions:
The Big Bang theory is the prevailing cosmological model for the universe[1] from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale evolution.[2][3][4] The model describes how the universe expanded from a very high density and high temperature state,[5][6] and offers a comprehensive explanation for a broad range of phenomena, including the abundance of light elements, the cosmic microwave background (CMB), large scale structure and Hubble's law.[7] If the known laws of physics are extrapolated to the highest density regime, the result is a singularity which is typically associated with the Big Bang. Physicists are undecided whether this means the universe began from a singularity, or that current knowledge is insufficient to describe the universe at that time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
 
Kumar, since long experience tells us that you have already reached your own conclusion, and that nothing anyone posts will dissuade you from it, please go ahead and tell us what it is. This will save us all a lot of time and reduce electron waste. Then we can start discussing your conclusion. Thanks.

Immortality of our current body not possible. Increase in life span can be possible if proper care is kept or we get evolved(may be as nature need it). At our most prime level, we are already immortal in sense, energy can not be destructed.
 
Depends entirely on your definition of 'immortality'.

And, of course, the last four are entirely speculative.

Hans

You please define, when you all discussing it lot since long back.

But those four may only indicate real sense of immortality. We may not be immortal at current body/molecular level but can be at energy level.
 
Once again, another incoherent Kumar thread. Oh, well.

Can emitted or reflected EM spectrum from our body create any affect?
That is a stupid question. The Human hand is sufficient to detect radiated heat from another human body. Northern pale bodies will reflect a lot more than darker southern bodies and none can compete with a simple white sheet. Sheesh. This should be obvious.

Will not be in energy state?
Nope.

You please define, when you all discussing it lot since long back.

But those four may only indicate real sense of immortality. We may not be immortal at current body/molecular level but can be at energy level.
That is a spectacular load of utter rot.

I guess I misunderstood. I'm way out of my depth on such topics.

Probably, evolutionary consequences may be responsible for biologically mortality and immortality.
And that is simply making stuff up out of whole cloth. Please stop doing that.


Kumar said:
No, the responsibility lies only in sloppy thought, tendentious redefinition of words, and stubborn refusal to learn.

Yes true.
By that, you admit that your responsibility is your sloppy thought, tendentious redefinition of words, and stubborn refusal to learn. Nobody asked you to make that admission, but jesus.
 
Once again, another incoherent Kumar thread. Oh, well.

That is a stupid question. The Human hand is sufficient to detect radiated heat from another human body. Northern pale bodies will reflect a lot more than darker southern bodies and none can compete with a simple white sheet. Sheesh. This should be obvious.

Nope.

Some more specifics can also possible eg. emitted or reflective EMRs spectrums.

That is a spectacular load of utter rot.

No. I want to understand, what can be we on our ultimate?


And that is simply making stuff up out of whole cloth. Please stop doing that.


By that, you admit that your responsibility is your sloppy thought, tendentious redefinition of words, and stubborn refusal to learn. Nobody asked you to make that admission, but jesus.

No, true because, I am it as not satisfied with replies. It can also be applicable to others. Moreover, some other facts were also there in that post.
 
Last edited:
And round and round we go...
Ok other:

Evolution of aging[edit]
Main article: Evolution of aging
As the existence of biologically immortal species demonstrates, there is no thermodynamic necessity for senescence: a defining feature of life is that it takes in free energy from the environment and unloads its entropy as waste. Living systems can even build themselves up from seed, and routinely repair themselves. Aging is therefore presumed to be a byproduct of evolution, but why mortality should be selected for remains a subject of research and debate.

Evolutionary immortality[edit]

Joseph Wright of Derby, The Alchymist, In Search of the Philosopher's Stone, 1771
Another approach, developed by biogerontologist Marios Kyriazis, holds that human biological immortality is an inevitable consequence of evolution. As the natural tendency is to create progressively more complex structures,[30] there will be a time (Kyriazis claims this time is now[31]), when evolution of a more complex human brain will be faster via a process of developmental singularity[32] rather than through Darwinian evolution. In other words, the evolution of the human brain as we know it will cease and there will be no need for individuals to procreate and then die. Instead, a new type of development will take over, in the same individual who will have to live for many centuries in order for the development to take place. This intellectual development will be facilitated by technology such as synthetic biology, artificial intelligence and a technological singularity process
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immortality

There appear to be a relation between Evolution and Mortality & Immortality. Probably, nature takes its own way to keep itself in balance.
 
Last edited:
Why you do not post, something coherent?

Mine most of the posts are coherent, directly or indirectly, in language or in sense. It is different issue you may perceive these differently.
 
Immortality of our current body not possible. Increase in life span can be possible if proper care is kept or we get evolved(may be as nature need it). At our most prime level, we are already immortal in sense, energy can not be destructed.

No, that is not immortality. 'Immortal' means unable to die. When you die, the energy and substances bound in you do continue to exist, but YOU are dead.

Hans
 

Back
Top Bottom