Strawberry
Master Poster
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2011
- Messages
- 2,151
I agree. It leads to one side dredging up grievance and the other saying "but that's nothing, you're not oppressed enough, get back in your box".
Who says the present international borders are the best possible situation for the world? Who says it's absolutely great for Malta and Ireland and Norway and Estonia and Iceland to be independent, but if any other comparable countries who don't happen to be independent right now aspire to that status this is evil and must be repressed?
Why are large states, arguably too big to be accountable to their populations, to be preferred over smaller ones? Indeed studies have suggested that the sweet spot for a country is between about 3 million and 12 million, large enough for economies of scale but small enough to remain socially cohesive and for the government to be reasonably accountable.
This is all just knee-jerk conservatism, championing the status quo because it's the status quo.
Oh, and this month's "pulling up the ladder behind you" award is shared between Ireland and Estonia, with a dishonourable mention for Norway.
The current Irish government's disgusting response to events in Catalonia shouldn't surprise anybody. The ruling party in Ireland is Fine Gael, whose political ancestors back in the 1930s formed the Blueshirts and sent volunteers over to fight for Franco in the Spanish Civil War. They've spent years since reinventing themselves as a socially liberal party of law and order, but their authoritarian roots are never far from the surface.