Jrrarglblarg
Unregistered
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 12,673
"Top. Men."
Simply a perpetuation of the BLAARG. Facts can be pesky, fantasies not so much. No actual evidence has ever been 'hand waved' away and maybe especially so "by people who should know better." In fact, the real situation is the exact opposite of that characterization. There's been a **** TON (**** TON?) of supposed/useless/non Bigfoot "evidence" vetted by who knows how many thousands of capable eyes (pro and con) over the many years and yet somehow we're still stuck at there is no actual Bigfoot.Some BFF Genius (taken from another thread) said:...Time and again the evidence collected gets dismissed by a wave of the hand by people who should know better...
Such a swell guy, pretending he's conceding "this time." And then, whoops, promptly disowns it by accusing the victor of also being the cause if he ever decides to "renege" on that admission. Wait, what?Some BFF Genius (taken from another thread) said:...This time I'll give you your due. (But just sayin' too, if I do renege, it will probably be your fault, not mine, 'k?) Ready?...
Some BFF Genius (taken from another thread) said:...only the body of something very few people are looking for is going to break this logjam. Those who clamor for that outcome are asking for something they've never seriously considered to exist...They pretend this makes perfect sense.
Yes of course, we're the ones pretending. Our seeming hand waving foolishness running so deep we're oblivious to what daft fools we truly are with that actual evidence requirement. And I'm sorry, "clamor" isn't the right word. BLAARGers are the ones who 'clamor' for an unreachable glory through real life game playing. We're the ones who simply 'wish' we gave an actual ****. Indulge me for a second. Forget that Bigfoot makes no sense ecologically or physiologically. My question is simply more about the process of what we would do with a corpse of unique scientific value.
.
Supposedly a group found a skull of a "baby bigfoot" back when I was on the BFF. They wouldn't see reason in reporting it, willfully ignoring the fact that it was someone's lost child, and that dental records might be used to bring closure to a family. My cousin, who was also a member of the forum at that time, called the local law enforcement agency in the area and reported the find and what was being said about it. Evidently the group really had a skull and it was promptly confiscated. If you find anything remotely human looking, that isn't fossilized, it needs to be reported to law enforcement.

Suspending common sense doesn't help clarify the ostensible question.
Imaginary species do not spring out in completely absurd contexts. There already is an existing scientific, academic, and public resource management infrastructure for species that actually exist. They are actively hunting new species. What will be found already has close cousins being managed.
The most likely things are insects. Bacteria, fungi, plants - not nine hundred pound gorillas. In the USA, a new species "corpse"is going to weigh whatever centipedes or butterflies weigh.
What is that thing? Oh you wanna drag it to the car and put it in the trunk? What if it's a guy in a suit?1. Take the Bigfoot body in your car.
Well that's suspicous behaviour. What if this is some dead guy in a suit?2. Bring it to an isolated area.
Oh god that is a zipper. And look there a dead guy inside this suit!3. Search over the body if it has zippers, fake paint, or fake fur.
What? Let's call the cops right now! You know how much trouble we are in?!4. Measure it and check it's organs just to make sure it's not human.
5. Drive it to the best scientific college you know.
6. Tell the professor to bring all his students to carry it to the lab.
7. Test the DNA.
8. Enjoy media attention.
9. See Bigfoot enthusiasts freak out.
10. Watch as people worldwide start searching for Bigfoot to put into zoos, do experiments and communicate with.
Okay, let us suppose something gets wormholed in from an alternate Earth. And some hapless person finds it in the woods. Weird, unique body of enormous scientific value.
Okay, let us suppose something gets wormholed in from an alternate Earth. And some hapless person finds it in the woods. Weird, unique body of enormous scientific value.
How can he know this? People blithely go about their day killing endangered butterflies on the grill of their vehicle, squishing the last brown-spotted centipede, slapping the unique subspecies of mosquito...
"Something" has to be defined for this to be a logical question. Tentatively, bigfoot. There's no bigfoot department with fish and game, no experiments going on by researchers, no placement agencies. Nobody to call about bigfoot, really - so it is a facile question "who do you call"? Who do you call about things that do not exist?
Coelacanth.... that was caught by fishermen and made it into the scientific field of research.
Find it pack it in cie and sell it.Indulge me for a second. Forget that Bigfoot makes no sense ecologically or physiologically. My question is simply more about the process of what we would do with a corpse of unique scientific value.
Suppose a Forest Service worker finds a recently deceased Bigfoot in a National Forest. What happens to the body? Where would it be taken for examination? Who would get called in to do the autopsy? Who would have custody of the body after it is dissected?
I mean it doesn't have to necessarily be a Bigfoot. It could be any corpse that completely changes scientific understanding found on public property.

Area 51