Here we are, back at 2007...
Except for a couple of teensy points.
Here's the standard clip, with title:
John Gross denies existance of molten metal.
I'm not inclined to clean up your mess for you, atavism.
I'll first give you a chance to do it for yourself.
Virtually every single thing the clueless questioner asks was (at that time), and is today, completely wrong.
The clueless idjit who named the video is 100% wrong.
And both of the precepts in your statement above were (at that time), and remain today, completely false.
On the other hand, everything that Gross said was (at that time) and remains today, absolutely true.
Would you care to try again?
I am also one of "that lot" (mechanical engineer) who supports the NIST report as first rate, professional and substantially correct.
And I completely reject the proposition that there were any explosives or thermitics in any of those buildings, proven beyond doubt to be impossible.
And I adamantly oppose a "new investigation" as:
1. absolutely unnecessary,
2. completely unwarranted by any evidence whatsoever,
3. an indefensible insult to the conscientious, dedicated work of a bunch of the country's best &
most loyal engineers,
4. a colossal waste of time & money, and
5. a hideous precedent, elevating
in national policy the brainless opinions of a tiny number of banal incompetents & blatant charlatans over the clearly stated, transparent, and industry accepted analyses of accomplished professionals.
Now, I ask you. In your considered opinion, should I be tried for treason as well, for stating what I believe?
