petpower_2k
New Blood
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2003
- Messages
- 23
among other things yessteenkh said:No the role of the assistant is more than that! Look at
What exactly are they doing? Calling names? Pinching?
among other things yessteenkh said:No the role of the assistant is more than that! Look at
What exactly are they doing? Calling names? Pinching?
CFLarsen said:Well, yes and no. Peter specifically stated that the assistant decides when the attacker is angry enough. Once that has happened, the attacker can start running. And then, there can be no doubt that the attacker was angry enough.
How we determine this level of anger, is a good question, though.
What is K1? I’m never heard of that one before?"dojo-crashing" or in other words, visit dojos and training centers of other disciplines (I suggest judo, mainstream full-contact karate, boxing, K1, Kendo) and claim you can lick anyone who dares to attack you.
steenkh said:I think that the YB person and assistant need to be searched for hidden devices, and that nobody - not even the assistant - may come closer to the attacker than a certain distance, like, say, 5 meters. We need to be sure that the assistant cannot throw an invisible thread around the legs of the attacker or fire a dart or whatever.
steenkh said:I would like to add that the precautions are also to protect the YB from accusations made later if the test succeeds.
petpower_2k said:I think all of your points are good.
petpower_2k said:we can remove the 30 second punching thing, simply let the attacker attack, and if he hits I loose the test, if attacker is unable to hit YB person or attacker is knocked down then we win.
petpower_2k said:About determining if the attacker is angry or not.
I believe it is impossible to know for sure how angry the attacker is.
Since it is impossible to know the intention of the attacker, all we can do is to do our best, and then see what happen.
Before and after the test we can ask the attacker if he is angry, and if he was angry during the attack. thats all we can do.
petpower_2k said:among other things yes![]()
Flo said:Are you trained in martial arts ? Have you talked about this "test" with a trained, high level, martial artist ?
Flo said:- One of the first thing you learn in martial arts is never to get "angry", or at least never to show anger, it clouds jugdement and impairs your reactions.
Flo said:- There is no single school of combat that teaches you to run 20 meters before you hit your opponent. There is no way you can correctly assess distances and the correct moment of attack (ma-ai) that way, whereas the guy waiting has all the time in the world to find out when and how you'll attack and devise a way to evade or trick you. Randi is right when he recommends that you just walk calmly towards the guy and just touch him (the colored chalk bit is good).
Flo said:- 30 seconds of continuous serious punching ? BS ! Look at any real fight (instead of MA movies where the heroes can keep fighting at maximum intensity for minutes on end), almost nobody keeps punching that long. 10 seconds then careful observation, then a few seconds more, etc.
Flo said:In short, either those guys are planning tricks, or they are seriously deluded as to what they are doing. Send someone really trained in martial arts.
Ossai said:Flo
What is K1? I’m never heard of that one before?
And isn’t dojo-crashing what the Gracies did to establish themselves?
Ossai
Atlas said:I think Flo makes good points.
It sure sounds like any test could be done easily inside 10 seconds. Five to cover the distance and 5 more to hit or fall down.
Are you considering making it the best 3 of 5?
CFLarsen said:We are in contact with martial arts experts. One will be the attacker, not me. I don't hit people.
Perhaps. But we are not talking about a prolonged match, we are talking about a martial arts expert simply touching - or hitting someone who will not fight back. That should not be a problem.
I don't see any reasons as to why the attacker has to come running, either. We'll talk to the martial arts expert and see what he says.
Flo said:you should try, you've no idea how liberating it is. It's the main reason why I still enjoy kendo: you are encouraged to hit people on the head with a big stick while yelling out loud and stamping your foot (if we could also slam doors, it would be perfect).![]()
Flo said:I know anger should not be a problem for a trained martial artist. The problem I see is with the bamboozled people: on the one hand, if they really think only someone angry can really hit hard, they really don't know much about what fighting sports are really about. On the other hand, getting their attacker angry amounts to a trick in order to make him lose control of the procedure.
Flo said:As I wrote, I see two: such a condition ensures the attack will lack force and precision, and it gives ample time to trick/distract the attacker.
Flo said:Another point: if they really believe there is a form of one on one combat where people start to run at each other from so far apart, it just shows how bogus the whole concept is.
Originally posted by Flo Another point: if they really believe there is a form of one on one combat where people start to run at each other from so far apart, it just shows how bogus the whole concept is. [/B]
thaiboxerken said:Why don't we just schedule a ring fight between this retard and a fighter? MMA rules or kickboxing, it shouldn't matter. Let's see if his powers work in a more live situation. Screw this testing stuff, it's obvious that he's not sincere. I just want to see him get whooped up on.
Hold the testosterone Thai.thaiboxerken said:Why don't we just schedule a ring fight between this retard and a fighter? MMA rules or kickboxing, it shouldn't matter. Let's see if his powers work in a more live situation. Screw this testing stuff, it's obvious that he's not sincere. I just want to see him get whooped up on.
petpower_2k said:
About determining if the attacker is angry or not.
I believe it is impossible to know for sure how angry the attacker is.
Since it is impossible to know the intention of the attacker, all we can do is to do our best, and then see what happen.
Before and after the test we can ask the attacker if he is angry, and if he was angry during the attack. thats all we can do.