• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Men did not descend from monkeys. Rather, both monkeys and men descended from a common ancestor.

Monkeys are around because of the same reason every other creature is around. It is highly successful in its environment, meaning that it can live and thrive to reproductive age.

Ok, time to battle insanity with insanity:

If evolution is true, and man descended from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?

This is precisely what you are doing, you just can't see it, as the issue is too close and emotional for you. I suggest you really think about the analogy I used earlier, and the completely dumb question I just gave you.
 
1-2. One could guess your PhD is not in physics, and chemistry.
3. Does this mean you retracted your steel turned to dust, and stopped spreading that insane lie?

But remember, it is only the Internet, and some people don't care if you spread lies and insane claims about 911, it is only the Internet.

Some people don't care if you spread lies, it is only the Internet. A media the whole world can see, why not spread lies and crazy claims, who will it hurt?

This was not a substantial answer.
 
Men did not descend from monkeys. Rather, both monkeys and men descended from a common ancestor.

Monkeys are around because of the same reason every other creature is around. It is highly successful in its environment, meaning that it can live and thrive to reproductive age.

You do understand that he knows that right? Please tell me you are being stubborn on purpose and you understand the point of his post. . .
 
You do understand that he knows that right? Please tell me you are being stubborn on purpose and you understand the point of his post. . .

Hey, man. I was looking for a question. I saw one. I gave the answer.

It wasn't a difficult question. I don't really care why he asked it. If I hadn't had a fluent, rapid answer, it would have aroused suspicion in some.
 
Oh, maybe I should point something out. Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C), but I'm also BY FAR the best biomedical scientist in this group. I'm also the best protester of the group. I'm used to being the best. It's no big deal, only, scratch that. It is a big deal.

If I knew I was the best 9/11 researcher, and I didn't tell you, then you wouldn't have the best opportunity to get what I'm saying. It's like if you met someone and months later it turns out he has a world record and gold medal in speed skating, you'd sorta wonder why he didn't tell you that before.

Being the best in the world at something is what it is. In graduate school, I was the absolute best at some things, meaning the best in the world. It ain't no big thang to be the best, for some people who are used to being the best and aim at that exact spot every time like me.

If you knew a gold medal winning speed skater for a long time, and he didn't tell you anything about his world record, then you'd wonder what else he was hiding. I'm the best (or among the tippy-top best) 9/11 researcher in the world. You don't have to "believe" me in any way just understand that that is how I'm representing myself to you and everyone else I encounter.

9/11 is what I do. I'm great at it. I know my stuff.
 
Last edited:
Hey, man. I was looking for a question. I saw one. I gave the answer.

It wasn't a difficult question. I don't really care why he asked it. If I hadn't had a fluent, rapid answer, it would have aroused suspicion in some.

.... :boggled:
Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C), but I'm also BY FAR the best biomedical scientist in this group. I'm also the best protester of the group. I'm used to being the best. It's no big deal, only, scratch that. It is a big deal.

wow. . . just amazing.
 
Last edited:
But remember, it is only the Internet, and some people don't care if you spread lies and insane claims about 911, it is only the Internet.

Some people don't care if you spread lies, it is only the Internet. A media the whole world can see, why not spread lies and crazy claims, who will it hurt?

Bless you, beachnut, I've had you on ignore for simply ages. If what is seen on the internet is of such importance, then look again at the example you offer. 10 years of failure ought to show you that ranting at truthers, however creative and clever, does not work. It. Does. Not. Work. Ten years, and you've learned nothing either.

90% of responses to Dusty would shame any forum, let alone one that elsewhere purports to value reason and rational argument, while decrying personal attacks. You don't demonstrate how much you value reason and rational argument by dispensing with them in favour of personal attacks.

I understand that's the way things are 'done' in the 9/11 forum. I still read some of it, still post occasionally, still sneer at some posters, still have you, and others, on ignore.

I'm going to try and take you seriously for a moment. Someone has posted something on the internet that you know is wrong. Marcus Aurelius, whose meditations I commend to you, would say "and...that surprised you? Get over yourself, every day you wake up and there are idiots out there. Would you have us believe you are so naive you didn't expect them? If you expected them, what are you getting so worked up about?"

It must be important to you to say '"Oh no it isn't" whenever someone says a certain "Oh yes it is". Have you ever been to a pantomime? More to the point, the putative stranger encountering what passes for debate will either know, through education and intelligence, which side they're on (in which case they are saying "Oh no it isn't" anyway, and don't need you as much as you think you're needed) or they will not know (and are as likely as not to choose the polite, respectful Dr. Dusty over the vile frothing of several serial 9/11 posters. Unless they want to belong, of course. Like Groucho, I'm comfortable not 'belonging').

Do I need to summarise that for you, or would it be wasted in the face of whatever mantra you've been chanting to yourself to justify your infantile aggression?

For the record, I viewed your post because you'd clearly referenced me. I won't be viewing your response to this. I'll view a post of yours if someone ever quotes you saying "Seriously guys? We're using her hair colour to attack her now? I quit."
 
Oh, maybe I should point something out. Not only am I the best 9/11 researcher (apart from the previously mentioned Drs. W and H-C), but I'm also BY FAR the best biomedical scientist in this group. I'm also the best protester of the group. I'm used to being the best. It's no big deal, only, scratch that. It is a big deal.

If I knew I was the best 9/11 researcher, and I didn't tell you, then you wouldn't have the best opportunity to get what I'm saying. It's like if you met someone and months later it turns out he has a world record and gold medal in speed skating, you'd sorta wonder why he didn't tell you that before.

Being the best in the world at something is what it is. In graduate school, I was the absolute best at some things, meaning the best in the world. It ain't no big thang to be the best, for some people who are used to being the best and aim at that exact spot every time like me.

If you knew a gold medal winning speed skater for a long time, and he didn't tell you anything about his world record, then you'd wonder what else he was hiding. I'm the best (or among the tippy-top best) 9/11 researcher in the world. You don't have to "believe" me in any way just understand that that is how I'm representing myself to you and everyone else I encounter.

9/11 is what I do. I'm great at it. I know my stuff.


Such extreme narcissism is yet another indication that you are mentally ill...
 
You've got a lot of reasons to trust me, dafydd, but your fear is the only thing that keeps you from trusting me.

I make mistakes, but when I find out about them, I correct my mistakes. I've been studying 9/11 for this entire time. I didn't start out knowing all this stuff. I came to expertise through solid, unrelenting effort.

Part of the effort I've spent is reaching out to people like you, skeptics. I want you to examine and debunk my theory, but many of you continue to bring it to a personal level.

I'm not lying. I'm everything I said I was, and I've done everything I said I have done.

If I'm right, I have made a world history changing discovery. If I'm wrong, I'll be embarrassed about it until I die. I've got pride. I like myself. I know I've achieved incredible levels of performance in my life, and I've chosen the most impossible and challenging project of anyone I know personally, although now since I've met both Judy and Frederick, I can't say that is precisely true.

Anyway, I've got the dust. I'm working on it.

Fear? I have no fear,I have no idea what you are rabbiting about. Trust you? I'd rather trust a starving cannibal who has just poured barbecue sauce over me. <SNIP>

Edited, breach of rule 0, rule 12.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Locknar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'd say that anything that is fabricated of both steel and concrete is, yes, made of steel. And concrete. And, almost exactly the same materials that every othe skyscraper is made of. There really isn't much variance here.
There actually is, you just aren't knowledgeable enough to know it.

For one, a steel-framed building is much different than a reinforced concrete building. Secondly, shape matters.
 
She's a PhD, but she's no scientist.

If she's a PhD but no scientist, then the award of a PhD is valueless - to everyone who has one, or is working for one, or ever attends an institute of tertiary education. At least we can avoid appeal to authority by establishing that no measure of ability confers authority, the critical measure is whether they agree with me. At least it wasn't you banging on about narcissism....

Cha...I forgot where I was for a moment. We don't have to make sense, just so long as we're heaping abuse on the right target.
 
90% of responses to Dusty would shame any forum, let alone one that elsewhere purports to value reason and rational argument, while decrying personal attacks. You don't demonstrate how much you value reason and rational argument by dispensing with them in favour of personal attacks.


go back to the start....we tried reason and rational argument.....it slid off like water of a ducks back. :rolleyes:
 
If she's a PhD but no scientist, then the award of a PhD is valueless - to everyone who has one, or is working for one, or ever attends an institute of tertiary education. At least we can avoid appeal to authority by establishing that no measure of ability confers authority, the critical measure is whether they agree with me. At least it wasn't you banging on about narcissism....

Cha...I forgot where I was for a moment. We don't have to make sense, just so long as we're heaping abuse on the right target.

How do we know that she is who she claims to be? Walter Mitty Syndrome can lead to detailed fantasies. All I see is a tiny picture of a woman with purple hair and a series of posts written by a no-planer who would not know what science was even if it jumped up and bit her on the backside and who keeps repeating the same insane mantras. Phd. No chance.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom