• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
So?

Some theory that might be something someday in the future does not mean that a sooper-dooper dustifying ray gun has been built today. Perhaps you need to find a different biz, this science thing is a bit beyond you.
 
Dragonrock said:
So?

Some theory that might be something someday in the future does not mean that a sooper-dooper dustifying ray gun has been built today ten years ago. Perhaps you need to find a different biz, this science thing is a bit beyond you.
Click to expand...

fixed that for you
 
WTC Dust said:
Check out the cnn article titled "Space-time cloak could conceal events".

Excerpt:
(CNN) -- New materials with the ability to manipulate the speed of light could enable the creation of a "space-time cloak" capable of masking events or even creating an illusion of "Star Trek"-style transportation, according to scientists in London.

The cloak, while currently only existing in mathematical theory, takes advantage of the potential properties of "metamaterials" -- artificial materials designed and manipulated at a molecular level to interact with and control electromagnetic waves.

Scientists have previously demonstrated that one possible use of metamaterials could be to render objects invisible by bending light around them.
Click to expand...

So in other words, the twin towers are still there, we just can't see them. :D
 
WTC Dust said:
Check out the cnn article titled "Space-time cloak could conceal events".

Excerpt:
(CNN) -- New materials with the ability to manipulate the speed of light could enable the creation of a "space-time cloak" capable of masking events or even creating an illusion of "Star Trek"-style transportation, according to scientists in London.

The cloak, while currently only existing in mathematical theory, takes advantage of the potential properties of "metamaterials" -- artificial materials designed and manipulated at a molecular level to interact with and control electromagnetic waves.

Scientists have previously demonstrated that one possible use of metamaterials could be to render objects invisible by bending light around them.
Click to expand...

http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html#reify
 
WTC Dust said:
Check out the cnn article titled "Space-time cloak could conceal events".

Excerpt:
(CNN) -- New materials with the ability to manipulate the speed of light could enable the creation of a "space-time cloak" capable of masking events or even creating an illusion of "Star Trek"-style transportation, according to scientists in London.

The cloak, while currently only existing in mathematical theory, takes advantage of the potential properties of "metamaterials" -- artificial materials designed and manipulated at a molecular level to interact with and control electromagnetic waves.

Scientists have previously demonstrated that one possible use of metamaterials could be to render objects invisible by bending light around them.
Click to expand...

And this has what to do with turning steel into dust on 9/11?
 
WTC Dust said:
Fires smell like what's on fire. I've smelled fires before in my lifetime. Many types of fires and other smells. I'm not a fire fighter, but I've actually had to put out fires in the course of my profession! Silly grad students don't know what to do if they set the place on fire.

Months later, I'm still asking myself, "What the heck is on fire at the WTC? WHY HAVEN'T THEY BEEN ABLE TO PUT OUT THE FIRE?"
Click to expand...

triforcharity said:
Yeah, well, you see here Dusty, I am a firefighter. I have smelled hundreds, possibly even thousands of fires. This is not including the fires that I have smelled in my back yard, or while camping.

Fires do have a distinct smell. Wood smells unique. Paper smells unique. Electrical smells unique. Petrol products smell unique.

But you see, when you have things like bodies, hydrocarbons, and other items burning, it makes a unique smell. Most people have not smelled burning flesh. I have. It has a VERY unique smell. Mix all them together, and you have a single unique smell. Most had not smelled anything like that. I certainly hadn't. But, was I (or any of the other firefighters there) suprised?

Not one damn bit.

Is it really that hard to figure out what would possibly be on fire at the WTC? Wow, keep smoking that pot!

BTW, please explain why you think a tool like this http://firechief.com/mag/firefighting_waterjet_technology_cuts/ might have been invented.

It will help if you read the article.
Click to expand...

tfk said:
Utter rubbish.

Cows do not smell like hamburger. Neither smells like burning cow bodies.

People do not smell like burning people. (I've smelled both. Only one of those is - sometimes - quite pleasant.)

Hair does not smell like burning hair.

Unlit matches do not smell like lit matches.

Burning paper does not smell like books.

Forest fires do not smell like forests.

Auto exhaust does not smell like gasoline.

The process of burning changes the chemical - and therefore aromatic - properties materials.
Click to expand...



Ahem, Dusty? Don't run away yet!! You've got some splain' to do!!
 
carlitos said:
Which is why once-charred white oak barrels turn white corn liquor into delicious bourbon. :)
Click to expand...

Then those barrels after the Bourbon makers are finished with them go to Scotland where they make Distilled Malt Liquor turn into Scotch Whisky.
 
Bottom of the electromagnetic spectrum

fess said:
And this has what to do with turning steel into dust on 9/11?
Click to expand...

What about an electromagnetic weapon with a frequency of zero and a infinite
wavelength that will transform steel into a open cell foam slag in milliseconds
with very little heat generation ? This slag dissolved into a dust powder with the
slightest of handling or bending. I've seen it with my own eyes.
 
When you believe in the destructive power of DC radio waves, the idea of harnessing the energy of a hurricane to remotely power a dustificator isn't much of a stretch is it?
 
Has WTC Dust managed to explain how over 1,462,000 tons of debris were removed from the WTC if the buildings turned to dust? Has he explained how 806,000 tons of that debris was screened and checked by 39,795 NYPD workers, over 600 of who were there the entire time the debris was being worked on, along with over 1,000 FBI agents, 50 of who were there permanently, yet none of them noticed that the debris never existed because it had all turned to dust?
 
Fonebone said:
What about an electromagnetic weapon with a frequency of zero and a infinite
wavelength that will transform steel into a open cell foam slag in milliseconds
with very little heat generation ? This slag dissolved into a dust powder with the
slightest of handling or bending. I've seen it with my own eyes.
Click to expand...

Where is this weapon you speak of? We sure could have used that weapon over Bagdad in 91'. Oh, thats right, it wasn't available in 91'. Nor was it available in 2001 and still not in 2010.
But trying to tell that to an individual that can crumble slag with his fingertips is not going to make any difference any way... right?
 
Fonebone said:
What about an electromagnetic weapon with a frequency of zero and a infinite
wavelength that will transform steel into a open cell foam slag in milliseconds
with very little heat generation ? This slag dissolved into a dust powder with the
slightest of handling or bending. I've seen it with my own eyes.
Click to expand...

Linky?
 
Fonebone said:
What about an electromagnetic weapon with a frequency of zero and a infinite
wavelength that will transform steel into a open cell foam slag in milliseconds
with very little heat generation ? This slag dissolved into a dust powder with the
slightest of handling or bending. I've seen it with my own eyes.
Click to expand...

I wish I knew whether you were joking or not.
 
PhantomWolf said:
Has WTC Dust managed to explain how over 1,462,000 tons of debris were removed from the WTC if the buildings turned to dust? Has he explained how 806,000 tons of that debris was screened and checked by 39,795 NYPD workers, over 600 of who were there the entire time the debris was being worked on, along with over 1,000 FBI agents, 50 of who were there permanently, yet none of them noticed that the debris never existed because it had all turned to dust?
Click to expand...

Dude, you're harshing Dusty's mellow with all these facts!
 
Fonebone said:
What about an electromagnetic weapon with a frequency of zero and a infinite
wavelength that will transform steel into a open cell foam slag in milliseconds
with very little heat generation ? This slag dissolved into a dust powder with the
slightest of handling or bending. I've seen it with my own eyes.
Click to expand...

No you haven't.
 
PhantomWolf said:
Has WTC Dust managed to explain how over 1,462,000 tons of debris were removed from the WTC if the buildings turned to dust? Has he explained how 806,000 tons of that debris was screened and checked by 39,795 NYPD workers, over 600 of who were there the entire time the debris was being worked on, along with over 1,000 FBI agents, 50 of who were there permanently, yet none of them noticed that the debris never existed because it had all turned to dust?
Click to expand...

Were all those people in on the conspiracy too WTC Dust? The list gets longer and longer.I'm not surprised that you have turned tail and run.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom