WTC dust

[WTC Dust]

Exactly. So you can't prove that this "magnetic foam" wasn't there before 9/11? You don't see a problem with this?

Can any of the other researchers on the dust prove their dust wasn't there before 9/11?

Not really. They got strange dust, and I got the same stuff.

 

[triforcharity]

I'm a biologist by training. I know what piss and puke are, and I can test for these things. Anything else?

Your sample in contaminated.

Any knowledge or conclusions that you draw from this dust are invalid.

I am trained in crime scene investigations. I can tell you, that in no uncertain terms, if you cannot account for the contamination, than the sample is invalid.

Did you maintain care, custody, and control of the sample since 2001? No? Oh, wonderfull. You have a bag of ****.

 

[excaza]

I've passed my letters. I can read the text, too! Peer reviewed literature is amazing for having both images and text!

So you feel you're making an accurate statement that you have dust from the WTC when you don't even know what your dust is made of?

If this is the case, you're left with pictures and the fact that they're both dust. Not exactly blazing a trail of science.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I'm a biologist by training. I know what piss and puke are, and I can test for these things. Anything else?

Since you're a biologist, & your study is strickly on life. What does that have to do with you? You're not a metallurgist!

 

[WTC Dust]

Then why are you afraid to show us your analysis of the dust sample that you have?

Scared enough to know that what you claim, & the dust sample that you have was contaminated, can't prove anything you say to be the truth?

That's why we think you're lying, of course it's not hard to point out a liar. Through their ignorance or their emotions, we can tell.

You just have to wait until December 1, when I have my seminar. Many of you use the word liar too loosely.

Nothing I've said is a lie. I do, in fact, possess some very strange dust that was collected from a particular location in lower Manhattan, quite near the World Trade Center.

 

[Sunstealer]

How are you so sure that DEW doesn't exist?

A laser is a DEW, and lasers exist.

lol reminds me of a Simpsons episode.

Judge: Mr. Hutz w've been in here for four hours. Do you have any evidence at all?
Hutz: Well, Your Honor. We've plenty of hearsay and conjecture. Those are kinds of evidence.

Dunno why people are still responding to WTCdust - she's never going to achieve what she thinks she can and anyone responding is just massaging her ego. Ignore it and she'll float away on the breeze.

 

[DGM]

Can any of the other researchers on the dust prove their dust wasn't there before 9/11?

Not really. They got strange dust, and I got the same stuff.

How do you know this? What methods have you used to determine what this dust consists of?

 

[excaza]

Dunno why people are still responding to WTCdust - she's never going to achieve what she thinks she can and anyone responding is just massaging her ego. Ignore it and she'll float away on the breeze.

It's entertaining to watch her flounder.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

You just have to wait until December 1, when I have my seminar. Many of you use the word liar too loosely.

Nothing I've said is a lie. I do, in fact, possess some very strange dust that was collected from a particular location in lower Manhattan, quite near the World Trade Center.

Well, I can sense a liar when they haven't proven that DEWs exist or that Judy Wood is right.

Actually, all that you said is a lie. You're a biologist & not a metallurgist.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

It's entertaining to watch her flounder.

Flounder is a flat fish, so I guess she has flat headed theories.

Now her theories are like the Titanic, she says that they're "unsinkable" but in the end, her theories sink to a deep dark paranoid oblivion.

 

[WTC Dust]

Since you're a biologist, & your study is strickly on life. What does that have to do with you? You're not a metallurgist!

Biology interested me for the first decades of my life. For the last 9 years, nothing has been as interesting as the search for the real weapon used to destroy the World Trade Center.

It took me four years to get a Bachelor's degree, and an additional five years to get a PhD. That's 9 years of serious study. I've got that many under my belt on the subject of 9/11, and it doesn't look like I'm going to stop any time soon.

In fact, this year is the first year I've had any original research on the subject, so I'm just about to move into a new phase.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

Bolding's mine:

Biology interested me for the first decades of my life. For the last 9 years, nothing has been as interesting as the search for the real weapon used to destroy the World Trade Center.

The real weapon was damage from the planes & fire. With me being a firefighter & you not, proves that you know nothing or have nothing of value to your case.

It took me four years to get a Bachelor's degree, and an additional five years to get a PhD. That's 9 years of serious study. I've got that many under my belt on the subject of 9/11, and it doesn't look like I'm going to stop any time soon.

Actually 1 thing that's gonna stop you: Evidence!

In fact, this year is the first year I've had any original research on the subject, so I'm just about to move into a new phase.

What "new phase"? If it's taking the Truther way, that's not a new phase.

 

[WTC Dust]

Your sample in contaminated.

Any knowledge or conclusions that you draw from this dust are invalid.

I am trained in crime scene investigations. I can tell you, that in no uncertain terms, if you cannot account for the contamination, than the sample is invalid.

Did you maintain care, custody, and control of the sample since 2001? No? Oh, wonderfull. You have a bag of ****.

You're presuming that my sample is contaminated, without evidence, other than the cigarette butts.

I'd account for contamination, if it were found.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Yay! Back to the beginning. The dust was discovered in a building that was covered in WTC dust on 9/11. I can prove this with publicly available images.

And what's your evidence that the building didn't already have this particular collection of dust on it before 9/11?

Dave

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

You're presuming that my sample is contaminated, without evidence, other than the cigarette butts.

I'd account for contamination, if it were found.

You just admitted that it's contaminated. So we don't "presume" anything, you've told us by typing it out. Admitting guilt leaves to a clear conscience!

 

[WTC Dust]

Bolding's mine:

I'm a research scientist, and you are not. Which means that I'm the one trained to explain previously undescribed phenomena, not you.

What evidence do you think can counter metallic foam?

Also, the new phase is that I'm actually have original results to discuss, compared to analyzing the results of other researchers.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I'm a research scientist, and you are not. Which means that I'm the one trained to explain previously undescribed phenomena, not you.

What evidence do you think can counter metallic foam?

Also, the new phase is that I'm actually have original results to discuss, compared to analyzing the results of other researchers.

Who trained you, a bunch of whackos from Richard Gage or Judy Wood? I studied about history since I was a little kid. You know nothing about true research girl!

What evidence do I have to counter you? You're not a metallurgist!

You mean other Truthers who think like you, act like you, & say the same things as you?

 

[phunk]

What metallic foam?

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

What metallic foam?

She failed to say which metallic foam it is:

Open-cell metal foam

or

Closed-cell metal foam

But I think the real truth of the matter is, she thinks nothing about the foam insulation that was on the planes. According to sources, the foam contains aluminum. She thinks that the aluminum in the foam is some kind of proof that either thermite or a DEW was used to "dustify" the steel within the WTCs'.

She's wrong on every count!

 

[WTC Dust]

She failed to say which metallic foam it is:

Open-cell metal foam

or

Closed-cell metal foam

But I think the real truth of the matter is, she thinks nothing about the foam insulation that was on the planes. According to sources, the foam contains aluminum. She thinks that the aluminum in the foam is some kind of proof that either thermite or a DEW was used to "dustify" the steel within the WTCs'.

She's wrong on every count!

Did a little research on metallic foams, I see. It's an irregular open cell foam. And aluminum is neither dark nor magnetic.