• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ignoring the details, I'm saying she hasn't even shown any evidence for 'foam' at all, metallic or not.
 
You're a research biologist, don't you have access to a microscope with a camera?
 
Did a little research on metallic foams, I see. It's an irregular open cell foam. And aluminum is neither dark nor magnetic.

Well of course I did research on them, it's like you've never tried to do the same thing. Then why do you persist that you're a metallurgist when in reality you're a biologist?
 
Attached below is an image proving there's a volcano in my back yard.

blurry_grass-470x288.jpg
 
Who trained you, a bunch of whackos from Richard Gage or Judy Wood? I studied about history since I was a little kid. You know nothing about true research girl!

What evidence do I have to counter you? You're not a metallurgist!

You mean other Truthers who think like you, act like you, & say the same things as you? :rolleyes:

Are there any truthers talking about heterogenous WTC dust? If so, I want to read what they say.
 
Are there any truthers talking about heterogenous WTC dust? If so, I want to read what they say.

There was alot of that stuff going on with them in 2006. Here it is in 2010 & 4 yrs. later we're talking about the same stupid ****. Do you see a problem here, WTC Dust? Go ahead & read on, but know this, they don't have any evidence to prove their (Truthers) claims.
 
Well of course I did research on them, it's like you've never tried to do the same thing. Then why do you persist that you're a metallurgist when in reality you're a biologist?

I'm not a metallurgist, but I have studied metals when I was a student. I took many years of chemistry, which included qualitative analysis and quantitative techniques. And I got fantastic grades in chemistry, almost all A's, especially laboratory chemistry.

I only got B's in physics. Boo. Except for labs, where I mysteriously got A's. I think my chemistry knowledge must have helped.
 
There was alot of that stuff going on with them in 2006. Here it is in 2010 & 4 yrs. later we're talking about the same stupid ****. Do you see a problem here, WTC Dust? Go ahead & read on, but know this, they don't have any evidence to prove their (Truthers) claims.

What were the people saying about the dust heterogeneity? Did you actually pay attention to their claims, or did you write them off without closely examining them?
 
I'm not a metallurgist, but I have studied metals when I was a student. I took many years of chemistry, which included qualitative analysis and quantitative techniques. And I got fantastic grades in chemistry, almost all A's, especially laboratory chemistry.

I only got B's in physics. Boo. Except for labs, where I mysteriously got A's. I think my chemistry knowledge must have helped.

If it helped, then you would know that what you're claiming is false, is that true?
 
I doubt there are many scientific papers to which the phrase "except for the cigarette butts" could be added anywhere in the methods or results sections, and still retain any credibility.

"Pores within the arctic ice cores contain trapped samples of the earth's atmosphere, preserved unchanged for tens of thousands of years, except for the cigarette butts."

"The control cultures were incubated under identical conditions except for the cigarette butts."

:D

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
I took many years of chemistry, which included qualitative analysis and quantitative techniques. And I got fantastic grades in chemistry, almost all A's, especially laboratory chemistry.

Something tells me you spent a little too much time on the marijuana "research".


:boxedin:
 
Did you actually pay attention to their claims, or did you write them off without closely examining them?

I paid close attention to their claims & found out that they lacked the education that was provided them to do proper research. They failed to provide physical evidence of their claims. Like you're doing now, failing to provide physical evidence for your claims. Sorry, but that's how everyone around here views them, including you.
 
I doubt there are many scientific papers to which the phrase "except for the cigarette butts" could be added anywhere in the methods or results sections, and still retain any credibility.

"Pores within the arctic ice cores contain trapped samples of the earth's atmosphere, preserved unchanged for tens of thousands of years, except for the cigarette butts."

"The control cultures were incubated under identical conditions except for the cigarette butts."

:D

Respectfully,
Myriad


That made me laugh!
 
I paid close attention to their claims & found out that they lacked the education that was provided them to do proper research. They failed to provide physical evidence of their claims. Like you're doing now, failing to provide physical evidence for your claims. Sorry, but that's how everyone around here views them, including you.

I just want to find out what they were saying. I already know what your opinion of them is.
 
I have to suspect that my samples are contaminated: with cigarette debris.
I'm not worried about that, but it is a source of contamination.

If you think "something" happened to contaminate my samples, what would it be? Humidity, perhaps. Not rain or snow (because of the concrete roof). Rain doesn't fall on the little nook where I found the samples. Some cigarettes did, so I'll have to account for that in my discussion of them.

Cigarettes can't produce metallic foam, and neither can humidity or a plane crash.

What if the guys trowing down the cigarette butts also took a whiz on your dust? Wouldn't that contaminate it?
 
Something tells me you spent a little too much time on the marijuana "research".


:boxedin:

I didn't smoke pot in college, except for like, one puff a year at a frat party or something. Grad school? Yes. By that time, I knew the health benefits.
 
My opinion goes beyond that. Look at my signature & follow the link to my blog, it tells everything about the Truthers.

I don't want to read what you think of the truthers. I already know. "Chewy doesn't like truthers."

What I want to know is what they said about the dust heterogeneity. Can you remember? It's important.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom