Does his steel turn into dust or not? If not, then I'm proved right.
I never said a fire couldn't weaken steel. I never said a fire couldn't melt steel (if it was hot enough). I said a normal fire can't turn steel into dust. Get this straight. If his steel sample doesn't turn into dust, then it proves my point convincingly.
Uh, that would be NO. The fact that steel weakens in a kerosine fire simply demonstrates HOW the steel in WTC towers was weakened. It's a direct correlation that you seem to be trying to avoid.
Making more inane declarations is not helping you. At least provide a link to the dust sample you keep talking about. I can't see it in any of your posts.
BTW, your initial claim that the towers were turned to dust has been falsified, so the only thing you've got left is to prove that the composition of the dust is evidence of dustified steel.
You'd have to come up with a testable theory as to what the dust SHOULD contain, were it made of dustified steel, you'd have to explain, using physics, how that process works, and finally you'd have to show that your dust actually does have those chemical and physical properties.
You've done exactly ZERO towards any of those things. I'm willing to wager that you don't actually know what your sample is made of, since you have already admitted you've not sent it to an independent lab for testing.
You're bluffing. And worse, you're lying. But that's just the way you work, I suspect - I find you remarkably unscrupulous.
)
