• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

WTC dust

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oystein said:
I, on the other hand, build towers with LEGO that could not possibly collapse, especially when I set fire to them! :cool:

Since they are gone now, that, too, proves they must have been dustified. Or vaporized. Or fumified. Whatever. Anyway. At millions of volts of electricity I presume.
Click to expand...


OMG! Think about it.. two would-be engineers being obstructed in their process of learning basic engineering principles and possibly even being subject to assassination attempts! Coincidence? I think not. It means the NWO doesn't like science and engineering and wants to stop it in its tracks! OMG!1!1!!


The consequences of the Truther Sciences are profound and far-reaching.
 
WTC Dust said:
How is it oversimplifying it?

According to the official 9/11 story, the forces acting on the buildings at the moment before the initiation of the final destruction are: gravity, wind, and the fire. Anything else?
Click to expand...

You mentioned in a previous post that you were fascinated by the fact that the pile kept burning for so long. Did you see them pumping the millions of gallons of water into the pile to cool it down ?
 
WTC Dust said:
BINGO!

Which is actually the bright side of things. We've seen a demonstration of incredible power using technology that not many are aware of. When we finally get this whole 9/11 thing figured out, that technology will still exist, and then we can use it for good.

We don't need to be fighting these wars for oil or even growing hemp, so in this way, two of my previously important activist activities has been usurped by what I've learned about the mechanism of destruction of the WTC.

Peak oil? Doesn't matter. Technology exists that could pretty much power the planet, as you said.
Click to expand...

You're going to have to try harder than that to make your trolling seem convincing.
 
WTC Dust said:
Here's a simple model: Take a steel cage, a plain and simple steel cage. The size doesn't matter, but let's say it's one foot cubed. Put this steel cage in a large bucket, one completely filled with kerosene. Light the kerosene and step away.

What is your expected result? Will the steel break apart into a zillion pieces?
Click to expand...

You're right, nothing happens to the steel...because the kerosene fumes burn above the level of the kerosene in the bucket. The fuel in the bucket would actually assist in keeping the steel at a reasonable temperature.

Are you sure you're a scientist? Your explanations are actually getting dumber as we read along...
 
WTC Dust said:
BINGO!

Which is actually the bright side of things. We've seen a demonstration of incredible power using technology that not many are aware of. When we finally get this whole 9/11 thing figured out, that technology will still exist, and then we can use it for good.

We don't need to be fighting these wars for oil or even growing hemp, so in this way, two of my previously important activist activities has been usurped by what I've learned about the mechanism of destruction of the WTC.

Peak oil? Doesn't matter. Technology exists that could pretty much power the planet, as you said.
Click to expand...

See, this is what I was getting at when I pointed out that beam weapon theories violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. There simply isn't a known source for enough power to dustify the WTC in 12 seconds, even if it were technologically feasible. WTC Dust here has a novel approach to this problem: simply pretend the Law doesn't exist. And, in that fantasy universe, suddenly there are no worries about finding new energy sources to replace oil, because we can just pretend there's an inexhaustible energy source to continue to power our society.

Those of us who have to actually deal with reality may not find all this terribly comforting.

Dave
 
Dave Rogers said:
See, this is what I was getting at when I pointed out that beam weapon theories violate the Law of Conservation of Energy. There simply isn't a known source for enough power to dustify the WTC in 12 seconds, even if it were technologically feasible. WTC Dust here has a novel approach to this problem: simply pretend the Law doesn't exist. And, in that fantasy universe, suddenly there are no worries about finding new energy sources to replace oil, because we can just pretend there's an inexhaustible energy source to continue to power our society.

Those of us who have to actually deal with reality may not find all this terribly comforting.

Dave
Click to expand...

Well, I mean a nuke could do it, but it's not exactly controlled, and blowing up nukes for power wouldn't really work too well. :p

brb, patenting an 'only-steel-blower-upper' bomb
 
I think you stupid debunkers are missing the point.

Fire weighs next to nothing, you expect us to think that a little fire in the towers weighed enough that it caused the towers to collapse!

HAHAHAHAHH!!

;)
 
bill smith said:
You mentioned in a previous post that you were fascinated by the fact that the pile kept burning for so long. Did you see them pumping the millions of gallons of water into the pile to cool it down ?
Click to expand...

Here is a little research task for you, to keep you busy:

- How much energy (heat) do you need to vaporize a million gallons of water?
- How many tons of average combustibles as found in normall office would you need to create this much heat?
- How many tons of average combustibles as found in normall office were there in the WTC complex?
- Compare the results, and discuss!
 
Oystein said:
Here is a little research task for you, to keep you busy:

- How much energy (heat) do you need to vaporize a million gallons of water?
- How many tons of average combustibles as found in normall office would you need to create this much heat?
- How many tons of average combustibles as found in normall office were there in the WTC complex?
- Compare the results, and discuss!
Click to expand...

Also an approximation of how much of the water was actually reaching the fires.
 
WTC Dust said:
Floors falling down on top of each other doesn't explain the top part of WTC 2. You know, the part that leaned over?

If it was floors falling down on top of each other that caused the destruction, the floors on the top part would have ended up intact on the ground.

They never found that huge chunk of the top of WTC 2 that leaned over. By the time it hit the ground, it was in tiny pieces. Explanation, anyone?
Click to expand...

This has got to be one of the stupidest things I have ever in my life read. You aren't very good at research are you? Why don't you try reading Bazant?
Then you might learn about crush up and crush down. Do you really expect the entire block to stay intact all the way to the ground and thn maintain its integrity after impact?
 
You are all in denial. Obviously the dustification was done by a GRASER (Gamma Ray Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation).

Look, so called "scientists," think for once! What happens when a supernova goes off? Right, the stars' core, after all nuclear fusion fuel is spent basically a big ball of iron (if that isn't a hint, than I don't know what is), get's so hot that the iron gets fissioned into pure helium. Since this reaction is endothermic, the core implodes with a big boom. (Note that, though gravity isn't a force strong enough to make a building collapse, it is a force strong enough to squeeze an iron ball the size of the sun into a black hole the size of earth).

Now since all tricks mother nature knows have been implemented in technology, GRASERs are REAL. Period. There's no denying.

Now, you basiccaly bring a big rod of a suitable material into space (is ISS a coincendence.. I think not), pump it with HAARP, and you can dustify pretty much everything you want, everywhere. Instant steel to helium conversion. Doesn't leave a trace. Clean, simple, proven. Perfect.

Sheesh, you brag about what you know about what you know about little things like chemistry and building construction, you obviously know nothing about science that is actually BIG. Use your imaigination. Tsss..
 
Last edited:
WTC Dust said:
So what was the horizontal force that threw the building debris sideways?

Wind?
Click to expand...

If you're talking about the large steel beams that were ejected laterally from the building...that's the natural result of the welds failing while the beam was in the elastic phase of deformity. When that happened, the potential energy stored in the beam caused it to be flung clear of the building.

I heard of one beam that crashed through a window of a building across the street and did substantial damage to a concrete column deep inside. Quite impressive.

It's a pretty simple concept, really. Try it with a paper clip. If you use your imagination, you can cause it to fly a pretty good distance just by bending it between two fingers.
 
WTC Dust said:
I've already begun. I posted an image of some of the dust that I have, and nobody really talked about it.

Want to be the first?
Click to expand...

Ok. Your image is an image of dust. It's not really data at all.

Could you please present your data?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom