Space beams isn't Dr. Wood's theory, and it isn't mine. Do a google search on your own for evidence of iron found in the dust. It's more satisfying to learn on your own, and that stuff isn't my research anyway.
Dr. Wood's theory hasn't been debunked. I'm waiting, guys. If you debunk it successfully, I promise to dump it ASAP, but not before.
Actually, yeah there is. Too many people are walking around thinking an airplane crash destroyed all those buildings (and hate Arabs because of it). Almost everyone else thinks that not only did a plane crash into the WTC, but additionally, explosives were used to finish the job.
Both of these ideas are incorrect, and they lead to false perps.
Dismissed. You failed to support your claims with evidence.
I'd just like to see him acknowledge that the piles also go 6 stories underground and are not "flat".She doesn't have a theory. All she says is DEW did it, no facts no figures only pictures with questions.
Tell us where the DEW was, how much energy did it use and where did it get this energy.
Dr. Wood's theory hasn't been debunked. I'm waiting, guys. If you debunk it successfully, I promise to dump it ASAP, but not before.
You see The Sphere in your first picture? The pile wasn't taller than that. My point proven by your evidence. Love it.
What sort of evidence would you like that Dr. Wood's energy weapon hasn't been debunked? I read around the forum, and I didn't see anything about her science. What I did see were many insults, specifically "insane". That isn't debunking.
Smoke? You left out smoke, it might be your fumes stuff. You are not a research scientist you are a paranoid dustified steel conspiracy theorist.
As a research scientist it is strange you failed to bring evidence, and missed the reports on the dust at the WTC. Very... whatever
anyone who gives Wood's theory even a shred of respect, gets put on my ignore list.
see ya.
Because you have the burden of proof with your extraordinary claims. Produce your evidence or admidt defeat of your claims. It is as simple as that. It is not a "difference of opinion". We are right and you are wrong. Get used to it.
Still no evidence. Real shocker.![]()
If WTC Dust provides proof that steel in the WTC was "dustified," into Fe and C I will leave this subforum forever.
WTC Dust:
As a research scientist you must have seen that there is thousands of pictures of steel and you of course know that the WTC complex had a very large "basement".
What sort of evidence would you like that Dr. Wood's energy weapon hasn't been debunked? I read around the forum, and I didn't see anything about her science. What I did see were many insults, specifically "insane". That isn't debunking.
there were 110 story BUILDINGS with every floor nearly OCCUPIED by what you find IN OFFICES.
Not including the GENERATOR floors which were machines that CONTAINED iron.
care to provide this papers??
Why do you use the word "dustified"? Seems like you've been reading Dr. Wood's website!
Scene 1: Huge buildings, made of billions of pounds of steel.
Scene 2: Dust in large amounts spread all over lower Manhattan, and a pile of steel that isn't much taller than 2 stories tall.