400,000 attendees, 200 cases in two weeks?
The country as a whole gets about 50,000 PER DAY.
I'll let somebody else do the math, but it looks to me that going to Sturgis might have been safer than staying home.
400,000 attendees, 200 cases in two weeks?
The country as a whole gets about 50,000 PER DAY.
I'll let somebody else do the math, but it looks to me that going to Sturgis might have been safer than staying home.
If contract tracing is limited then the 50,000 number should also likely be much higher - in which case the comparison holds true; unless you think that the people who went to Sturgess all happen to live in those states where there is limited contact tracing.What is it about, "But epidemiologists say the actual number is likely much higher. Limited contact-tracing ability in some states is artificially reducing the case numbers, they say," you don't understand?
If contract tracing is limited then the 50,000 number should also likely be much higher - in which case the comparison holds true; unless you think that the people who went to Sturgess all happen to live in those states where there is limited contact tracing.
But the same holds true for the general population. And all we want to compare is the rate of Covid, Sturgis vs the whole country. Sounds like you want to compare apples that have been examined under a microscope against oranges.There was also this, quoted in the same post: "Plus, there was a strong thread of disdain in the crowd for testing and other safety measures."[/I] You know, 'it's just the flu' and all that ...
But the same holds true for the general population. And all we want to compare is the rate of Covid, Sturgis vs the whole country. Sounds like you want to compare apples that have been examined under a microscope against oranges.
But the same holds true for the general population. And all we want to compare is the rate of Covid, Sturgis vs the whole country. Sounds like you want to compare apples that have been examined under a microscope against oranges.
We estimate that over 250,000 of the reported cases between August 2 and September 2 are due to the Sturgis Rally. Roughly 19 percent of the national cases during this timeframe.
We conclude that the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally generated public health costs of approximately $12.2 billion.
here ya go, study is linked in the tweet by one of the authors:
https://twitter.com/FriedsonAndrew/status/1302591878957862912
http://ftp.iza.org/dp13670.pdf
Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Is Now Linked to More Than 250,000 Coronavirus Cases
https://www.motherjones.com/coronav...linked-to-more-than-250000-coronavirus-cases/The inevitable fallout from last month’s Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, an annual event that packed nearly 500,000 people into a small town in South Dakota, is becoming clear, and the emerging picture is grim.
According to a new study, which tracked anonymized cellphone data from the rally, over 250,000 coronavirus cases have now been tied to the 10-day event, one of the largest to be held since the start of the pandemic. It drew motorcycle enthusiasts from around the country, many of whom were seen without face coverings inside crowded bars, restaurants, and other indoor establishments.
Called it, cheap Harleys in the autumn.
Thank you and (OT) ftp? Wow....here ya go, study is linked in the tweet by one of the authors:
https://twitter.com/FriedsonAndrew/status/1302591878957862912
http://ftp.iza.org/dp13670.pdf
OT: I wonder if we can now use the number of cellphones at an event to count the attendance? Rallys, marches, demonstrations, inaugurations?
Imagine dying of covid because you just had to see Smash Mouth. Inconceivable.
I didn't see the CDC graph that shows a 250k spike. Did I miss it?
eta: hers is a link to one. https://covidtracking.com/data Scroll down to the pink graph. Gee, if any connection at all, Sturgis caused a drop in new cases. Nah, no connection. no 250K new cases, no $13B in costs.
Oh no, wait, pedantic writing- "250k new cases due to the rally"? Ok. but they are in place of the 250k new cases that would have happened from other causes, net increase due to Sturgis, 0.
"Somebody once told me
the world is going to roll me
I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed"
In retrospect, it reads like a prophecy.
Do you deny that this disease is contagious and that a 10 day event would benefit the spread of this disease?
How exactly am I supposed to understand this post of yours?
Is it:
"Covid is a complete Hoax" ?
or
"Covid exists but is far less dangerous than everyone tries to make it" ?
or something else?
What is the purpose of a post like this? Do you deny that this disease is contagious and that a 10 day event would benefit the spread of this disease?