So you are acknowledging the fact that Flight 93 - to the exclusion of all other flights - and with passengers aboard, crashed that day near the town of Shanksville, Pennsylvania? If we agree on this, then why the thread?When did I make any such claims? I said that a bullet was a bad analogy and it is?
I'm not sure why this troll thread has been started. I have made no claims about flight 93 not crashing and I was just discussing Gravys debate
So you are acknowledging the fact that Flight 93 - to the exclusion of all other flights - and with passengers aboard, crashed that day near the town of Shanksville, Pennsylvania? If we agree on this, then why the thread?
Unless you have a differing theory?
Well, then tell us what you think happened to UA93. Please don't forget to mention the passengers and the crew. Thanks.
The recovery teams had to build a dam to stop debris FLOATING away
Wait...debris can float away when it hits water? You agree with this?
so if you dont know then is it not possible it happened just the way the NTSB and official reports say it happened?I don't know and have never claimed to know
so if you dont know then is it not possible it happened just the way the NTSB and official reports say it happened?
Yes but it is a very misleading analogy. Nobody has any feel for how fast a bullet goes anyway because you dont see them travel through the air.
Bullets generally penetrate things, planes generally dont
Did it crash in PA?Erm i didn't start the thread. I don't know what happened to flight 93
Erm i didn't start the thread. I don't know what happened to flight 93
I don't care if the plane was doing Mach 3, it couldn't bury itself 25 feet ondergound and leave a crater about 10 feet deep.
Show us the 95% of the plane that was recovered and we will shut up about flight 93.
Could you find me a case where a plane buries itself underground like Flight 93 is supposed to have done?
Because I would expect said crater to be 25 feet deep
A 45 degree angle of impact would actually half the vertical component of the force of the planes impact.
Yes but it is a very misleading analogy. Nobody has any feel for how fast a bullet goes anyway because you dont see them travel through the air.
Bullets generally penetrate things, planes generally dont
I don't know and have never claimed to know
So when light debris from Flight 93 hit Indian Lake about a mile and a half from the crash site, the debris could easily have floated to wherever it was discovered?
Yet you question the official account. How is that?
Then I will make the inference that you don't believe Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville PA on 9/11....I don't know what happened to flight 93
Because i'm a true skeptic and don't accept what the government forcefeed me.
Then I will make the inference that you don't believe Flight 93 crashed in Shanksville PA on 9/11.
It's been more than 5 years. The official reports are that Flight 93 crashed at around 10 am on 9/11/2001 near the town of Shanksville, PA. The cause was determined to be actions taken in the cockpit by people other than the regular pilots, as a result of hijacking by suicide/homicide-minded terrorists.
If, after 5 years, you claim to not know what happened to Flight 93: Please be more specific. What is it that you doubt about the official reports?