POPCORN! Gravy is on...! :D
- Thread starter Oliver
- Start date
It was like a bullet; only someone as dumb as Alex Jones would disagree!
Bermas was spewing lies and being corrected by Dylan. Both liars look kind of weak on facts (Dylan/Bermas for the mentally challenged)
Dominates?
Do you hear what he is actually saying?
He's a loud mouth, that's for sure, but what he's saying is total crap.
Arus808
Philosopher
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 6,204
He was comparing the SPEED of the plane. Do you know how much damage can be caused by soemthing traveling at 800 feet per second?
Give a liar something to lie about, and he can be convincing enough to look to be telling ot truth. The only thing is, its still a lie.
Bermas can be convincing, but he wasn't stating any sort of facts.
How is that going to help people visualise the speed of a plane when noone has ever SEEN a bullet in flight?
They'll find a video on youtube, silly.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1637
Pssssst roxy? You forgot to mention marxists and degenerates.....
ConspiRaider
Writer of Nothingnesses
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
- Messages
- 11,156
Try this one then.
Go to an Indy car race.
Get down to track level, about halfway down the straightaway. Stand as close to the fence as you can.
Feel the sound, power and SPEED of those cars roaring down the straightaway as they pass your position. Awesome.
When Flight 93 hit the ground, it was travelling at more than twice the speed of the fastest Indy car on the longest straightaway.
I don't care if the plane was doing Mach 3, it couldn't bury itself 25 feet ondergound and leave a crater about 10 feet deep.
Show us the 95% of the plane that was recovered and we will shut up about flight 93.
A W Smith
Philosopher
ok heres a video of a car going 267MPH as viewed from behind. imagine twice this speed hitting the ground. its towards the end of the video but i think you will get the picture. I know shameles plug i crew on such a car.
Last edited:
Start your own thread about it.
You're an expert on plane crashes?
Why should they show you ANY of the wreckage? You wouldn't understand it even if they did, unless you are an expert on plane crashes.
Do you never trust experts?
Do you always argue with your doctor?
No you wont. Experience tells you will find another way to "question" the evidence. Evidence only means something to you folk if it happens to support your position. That's why you cling to the conspiracy theory - the preponderance evidence is against you, but you cherry pick anyway.
Arkan_Wolfshade
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2006
- Messages
- 7,154
Show your work supporting this statement, or retract it as being nothing more than your non-authoritative opinion.
defaultdotxbe
Drunken Shikigami
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2006
- Messages
- 7,474
i was wondering why ron showed th ePM book to the wrong camera, lolSo it's their own take? I do hope that's the explanation for the dodgy audio
whats the point of saying superman is "faster than a speeding bullet"
even if people havent SEEN a bullet they still have an idea that its pretty darn fast
im sure you have some sort of proof to back that up
whats the point? it wont convince the truthers, they look at all the evidence out there, dismiss it all as fake, then say theres no evidence
they couldnt pull their logic into a tighter circle if they tried
ConspiRaider
Writer of Nothingnesses
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2006
- Messages
- 11,156
Oh? Are you making that statement based on your storehouse of knowledge gained as an onsite jet crash investigator? Or, is this just what you "feel"?
Reassembling a crashed jet is a very painstaking, time-consuming, labor-intensive undertaking. Expensive too. Such an activity proceeds when, all things considered, it is deemed a worthy venture. Despite the difficulty. To determine WHY an aircraft crashed when there is no other reliable methodology to draw upon.
But we KNOW why Flight 93 crashed. No mystery.
Last edited:
Spins
Muse
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2006
- Messages
- 702
Basically Flight 93 hit the ground at an almost 90-degree angle at this speed...
...now after viewing the video could you please explain to us all why you think the plane shouldn't have buried itself 25 feet undergound and left a crater about 10 feet deep?