Why why can not Conspiracy theorist answer my one question?

[PerryLogan]

Coming to a theater near you:
Chainsaw-Wielding JREF Ninjas
starring Tom Cruise

I think the real answer to Chainsaw's original question (why can not Conspiracy theorist answer my one question?) is that Truthers never answer questions.

Truthers never give straight answers; they never get their facts right; they have no command of dialectical thinking; they never laugh or smile.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I see. Yes, I would think it is theoretically possible for friction in a building collapse to burn some amount of aluminum.

It is not only theoretical, Nist found evidence of burned Aluminum casing but declined to use that as evidence of temperature, because you can not tell if it was from the fire, or from the energy of the collapse, and that was solid aluminum.
Given the potential energy involved and the ease of breaking the Oxide layer in molten Aluminum, It is just about assured that Aluminum burned in the twin towers, the amount depends on the temperature of the aluminum, the energy of the collapse, the available oxides, and the general amount of molten Aluminum.
When I sand blasted aluminum, the Aluminum burned and the particles picked up most of the heat and actually floated in the air. It was like watching a miniature pyrocaustic flow forming right in front of me.
If that happened in the towers and went down the central core then the buildings where fried toast, and if that hot debris hit world trade 7 it could explain a lot.
http://www.mauinews.com/story.aspx?id=22618

I even set off a thermite like reaction that in nature would have been completely natural in the buildings, and yes it was explosive not endothermic as I had expected, it produce hot burning aluminum similar to a gasoline fireball, a fuel air blast with aluminum as the fuel I even got something similar to a sun burn from it.
It was incredible, to say the least and bright to bright, even a welding hood did not protect my eyes enough.
Lets just say I never want to see that again.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Coming to a theater near you:
Chainsaw-Wielding JREF Ninjas
starring Tom Cruise

I think the real answer to Chainsaw's original question (why can not Conspiracy theorist answer my one question?) is that Truthers never answer questions.

Truthers never give straight answers; they never get their facts right; they have no command of dialectical thinking; they never laugh or smile.

I thought some of the threats, insults, and hate mail that truthers have sent me were quite humorous, especially the ones who can not spell the word death, kick, or but.
I also think they should check out who they are threatening before they start something, they might find more than they bargain for.
The bright side is I am probably taking some of the hate off of DR. Greening, and the other real Scientist that are actually investigating 9/11.

 

[T.A.M.]

Does the Chainsaw pull on the hair as it is "shaving" you?

lol

TAM

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Does the Chainsaw pull on the hair as it is "shaving" you?

lol

TAM

Yes, but no worse than a waxing.

 

[Horatius]

About 25-30 minutes of run time, I do have a concrete cutting chainsaw with a diamond chain that will cut though a sword like butter though.

Oh yeah, I'm screwed. No way I can run that long.....Time for the old Banzai try-and-die.

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

I thought some of the threats, insults, and hate mail that truthers have sent me were quite humorous, especially the ones who can not spell the word death, kick, or but.
I also think they should check out who they are threatening before they start something, they might find more than they bargain for.
The bright side is I am probably taking some of the hate off of DR. Greening, and the other real Scientist that are actually investigating 9/11.

Making fun of other people's grammatical errors in the same passage as committing your own is entertaining. Chainsaw, you make the same language errors as the author of the "debunking" site. Are you him/her?

 

[Horatius]

Making fun of other people's grammatical errors in the same passage as committing your own is entertaining. Chainsaw, you make the same language errors as the author of the "debunking" site. Are you him/her?

Which debunking website are you referring to? There don't seem to be any such links here.

 

[TruthSeeker1234]

I was referring to this one.

http://www.debunking911.com/

 

[Bell]

I was referring to this one.

http://www.debunking911.com/

Instead of paying attention to language errors on that site, pay attention to what is presented there. It might help you in understanding what happened on 9/11. Allthough I won't hold my breath.

 

[T.A.M.]

making fun of gramatical errors within a blog or forum is useless really. Most people make such errors out of haste more so than illiteracy or lack of language skills anyway.

TAM

 

[Trifikas]

Yes, but no worse than a waxing.

You had a waxing? Man, I thought you were brave for the Chainsaw-shaving trick...

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

Making fun of other people's grammatical errors in the same passage as committing your own is entertaining. Chainsaw, you make the same language errors as the author of the "debunking" site. Are you him/her?

When you start getting personal hate mail, from Jerfers, I will listen to your comment, and no I do not have a debunking site I simply go by the physical evidence.

As it is presented by the materials involved!

Have you ever received a death treat from a debunker, in the mail?
Is it not better I laugh it off than saw off one of their private parts?

 

[T.A.M.]

When you start getting personal hate mail, from Jerfers, I will listen to your comment, and no I do not have a debunking site I simply go by the physical evidence.

As it is presented by the materials involved!

Have you ever received a death treat from a debunker, in the mail?
Is it not better I laugh it off than saw off one of their private parts?

with 100% certainty...YES!!!

TAM

 

[R.Mackey]

Oh yeah, I'm screwed. No way I can run that long.....Time for the old Banzai try-and-die.

This is quite a surreal conversation... but entertaining...

I think we've coined a new phrase here: Bringing a knife to a chainsaw fight.

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

This is quite a surreal conversation... but entertaining...

I think we've coined a new phrase here: Bringing a knife to a chainsaw fight.

Wonder would that be a good motto, for people who are from loose change trying to debate Jerfers?

Conspiracy theorist, trying to debate Jerfers is like bringing, a knife to a chainsaw fight, would that be a good assessment of the debate?

 

[Pardalis]

I think it's JREFers

 

[Pardalis]

You shave your legs with a chainsaw?

Why?

Have you ever tried to get some one else to stand still why you shave their legs with a chainsaw?

Thanks for answering my question, but my question really only was:

Why do you shave your legs?

 

[Crazy Chainsaw]

I think it's JREFers

Thank you for the clarification, I some times still have trouble seeing after the Aluminum+Oxygen explosion, I witnessed the price of knowledge, and discovery.
Do you think it would be a good comparison though, a Conspiracy theorist debating a JERFer Skeptic, is like someone bringing a knife to a chainsaw fight.

 

[Pardalis]

Usually when you ask a question you leave a question mark at the end of the sentence.