Why why can not Conspiracy theorist answer my one question?

Who is Doc Jones? Is he really still alive and has
something new to the MIHOP-Crap? Seriously.
 
You really need to open a "World's Toughest Barbershop." Guys would line up around the block and pay big bucks to say they got a chainsaw trim. Insurance would be a bit of an issue, but you could have them videotape their permission/disclaimer, and maybe take a breathalyzer beforehand. Think of the T-shirt, coffee mug, and toiletries sales!
May have to do that, with the constant rain and all business has been down.
I used to make a fortune at bar bets, but since I got famous for what I do no one will bet against me any more!
Yes mine was a mis spent youth, I spent my days doing sculptures of naked women as they posed for me and got paid to do it. That can corrupt a young teenager 14-15. There is the one under ware model, I got so good I could do her bare skin on a bear skin rug, from memory alone, every time she got a new boyfriend I did a new sculpture, about 3 times a month.
If I could only bottle and sell my memories.
The only problem is I found out early how shallow many people really are, just hollow shells, with nothing inside, pretty on the outside but empty within.

Sorry about getting off topic, I sometime reminisce about my misspent youth, I have to admit it was fun. I apologize. Hope no one is offended.
It is sometimes hard to keep those times out of my thoughts.
 
Last edited:
For R.Mackey

This is the only copy I could find.

Columbia.JPG
 
And here I thought it was the video of me shaving my legs with the chainsaw that was turning them away. The picture on my profile is from that video.

I may regret this, but - Can you post a link to that video? I'm pretty sure I could win a few bets with it.....
 
yes



yes



You mean in an alumino-thermic reaction? A thermite reaction? It is an electrical force of attraction strong enough to rip the oxygen molecule off of the iron molecule and onto the aluminum molecule.
Yes just as carbon can rip the oxide off of iron ore to produce Iron.

No Aluminum reacts to the oxygen in air, it Oxidizes when ever the Aluminum Oxide is broken as long as it has an oxygen source, air is about 20 percent oxygen.






uh, the aluminum oxide perhaps? I don't think this could be a very strong reaction, because you have aluminum giving up oxygen to aluminum.

Air how about that as the Oxidizing compound?



I don't mean to be rude, I don't understand your question that you think we are afraid to answer. Could someone rephrase it in standard English?

How can you prove that aluminum would not burn in the collapse do to the energy of the building falling on it, breaking the Aluminum oxide coating of the molten aluminum from the planes and aluminum in the building that had become molten?
To do so you have to eleminate all mechanical energy that could have triggered the reaction.


Even wave motion sound can cause aluminum to react, I can make it dance to music.
Any energy that involves motion can cause aluminum to react.

The reason that you use small particles of Aluminum in thermite with 1/3 aluminum to 2/3 Iron oxide is so the thermal energy of the trigger device will expand the oxide coating, and so the oxide will not reform, when the device is triggered. Molten aluminum is different, it can auto heat once it reaches the temperature where the oxide melts nothing can stop it from Oxidizing do to the oxide flowing away for the Aluminum.
The sand blasting mainly showed that the Aluminum burned in air, even better than I expected.
PS. Aluminum Oxide could never have been the Oxide providing compound, Aluminum Oxidizing produces Aluminum Oxide, Once produce the Oxide is extremely hard to separate from the aluminum.
That is the reason that Aluminum is the metal with the greatest production cost, to produce, it takes a lot of energy to break the oxide coating.
 
Last edited:
I may regret this, but - Can you post a link to that video? I'm pretty sure I could win a few bets with it.....

That Video is not currently on line, as I am still in negotiations with Ripley's for the rights to show it.
Here is the one on my gambling addiction though.
http://chainsawsanders.com/Gambler2.WMV

I do hope soon to do another national TV. show, and I owe it all to the scientific method, and logic.
 
For R.Mackey

This is the only copy I could find.

[qimg]http://chainsawsanders.com/Columbia.JPG[/qimg]
Thanks. Nicely done.

That Video is not currently on line, as I am still in negotiations with Ripley's for the rights to show it.
Here is the one on my gambling addiction though.
http://chainsawsanders.com/Gambler2.WMV

I do hope soon to do another national TV. show, and I owe it all to the scientific method, and logic.
See, this is what I love about the JREF Forum.

You never know what kind of things other users are up to. Never!
 
That Video is not currently on line, as I am still in negotiations with Ripley's for the rights to show it.
Here is the one on my gambling addiction though.
http://chainsawsanders.com/Gambler2.WMV

I do hope soon to do another national TV. show, and I owe it all to the scientific method, and logic.

Damn. I have a hard enough time just cutting a straight line with a chainsaw.


Do keep us posted on the Ripley's thing, please!

ETA: This is probably the closest I could come:

9490455fc02f55e04.jpg
 
Last edited:
You shave your legs with a chainsaw?

Why?

Have you ever tried to get some one else to stand still why you shave their legs with a chainsaw?

Plus it is not the dumest thing that can be done with a chainsaw.

"Wed Feb 11, 6:32 AM ET

BERLIN (Reuters) - A German actress was taken to hospital after an artist injured her breasts while trying to cut open her bra with a chainsaw during a rehearsal for a stage show, she has told a newspaper.

"It was the worst moment of my life. I thought, Sibylle, you're going to die," the actress, former porn star Sibylle Rauch, 43, told Bild newspaper.

The chainsaw operator, performance artist Marko Koenig, said Rauch was lying down during the rehearsal on Monday and suddenly bent forward just as he was applying the saw to her bra.

"I couldn't pull back the chainsaw quickly enough and cut her breast and stomach. It was terrible," he told Bild. The hospital in Karlsruhe, southwest Germany, where Rauch was treated declined to give details of her injuries. "We are not authorised to comment on our patients," a spokesman said.

After the terrible accident, which went through all media, Erotikstar Sibylle smoke is again on the way of the improvement. The actress ("ice at the handle") overcame the shock of her accident with partner and action artist Marko king. "Marko does not meet a debt, it was although more terrible an industrial accident. Marko could avoid thanks of experience of many years worse ". "the wounds do not do already any longer pain and I hope in such a way that no visible scars remain", so the artist in the long term. Shortly Sibylle smoke and action artist Marko king continue with the samples to the "Kettensaegenshow" and the concept "ice to Stiel" party and are ready for new spectacular appearances. Also the two want to show the famous BH number"

Note to the German chainsaw artist when removing a bra one of my old stunts, cut the underwire first, before taking the chainsaw to the bra.

Some germans offered me a lot of money if I would do the stunt in an adult film, I declined sticking with family entertainment.

Any body here want to help me practice the old belt buckle stunt though, you wear it I carve it?
 
How can you prove that aluminum would not burn in the collapse do to the energy of the building falling on it, breaking the Aluminum oxide coating of the molten aluminum from the planes and aluminum in the building that had become molten?
To do so you have to eleminate all mechanical energy that could have triggered the reaction.

I must not understand your question. I'm assuming that you are not a native English speaker, your syntax is a bit foreign to my ear.

Let's see. You want me to assume there is an aluminum oxide coating on aluminum aircraft parts, and assume there is molten aluminum in the building, then assume the building collapses, then try to prove that the mechanical energy is insufficient to break off the aluminum oxide from the molten aluminum, and/or insufficient to burn the already molten aluminum?

Do I have this right? Help me, I honestly don't understand what you're asking "conspiracy theorist" to respond to.
 
Last edited:
By the way, Chainsaw, are you the author of the "debunking" site? It's that "theorist" instead of "theorists" thing.
 
Have you ever tried to get some one else to stand still why you shave their legs with a chainsaw?
Why, no, I haven't, although I often dream about the possibility. The best I can do here in Brooklyn is run an extension cord out to the street with my Sawzall and see who's game, but that lacks the single-stroke menace that you bring.

Let's hope it never comes to this, but if it does, I'd pay good money to see Horatius "Krazy Katana" vs. Crazy Chainsaw.

FEMA camp festivities!
 
Let's hope it never comes to this, but if it does, I'd pay good money to see Horatius "Krazy Katana" vs. Crazy Chainsaw.

FEMA camp festivities!

It all comes down to how fast I can run vs. how big a gas tank he has.
 
I must not understand your question. I'm assuming that you are not a native English speaker, your syntax is a bit foreign to my ear.

Let's see. You want me to assume there is an aluminum oxide coating on aluminum aircraft parts, and assume there is molten aluminum in the building, then assume the building collapses, then try to prove that the mechanical energy is insufficient to break off the aluminum oxide from the molten aluminum, and/or insufficient to burn the already molten aluminum?

Do I have this right? Help me, I honestly don't understand what you're asking "conspiracy theorist" to respond to.

What are planes made of, Aluminum, Aluminum does not burn because of the oxide coating on it. If the planes had no Aluminum Oxide coating then the planes would instantly burst into a white hot fireball at 2800c.
The planes Aluminum melts at 600c and becomes molten, now prove that there is no Mechanical energy motion in the collapse of the towers to cause an aluminum+ Oxygen-Burning Aluminum reaction.
PS. All Aluminum+ Oxygen reactions require an active energy to break the Oxide coating, the higher the temperature of the Aluminum the less energy that is required to break the oxide coating.
All the energies, are in a motion or wave form, so prove there is none not even sound in the collapse.
 
What are planes made of, Aluminum, Aluminum does not burn because of the oxide coating on it. If the planes had no Aluminum Oxide coating then the planes would instantly burst into a white hot fireball at 2800c.
The planes Aluminum melts at 600c and becomes molten, now prove that there is no Mechanical energy motion in the collapse of the towers to cause an aluminum+ Oxygen-Burning Aluminum reaction.
PS. All Aluminum+ Oxygen reactions require an active energy to break the Oxide coating, the higher the temperature of the Aluminum the less energy that is required to break the oxide coating.
All the energies, are in a motion or wave form, so prove there is none not even sound in the collapse.

I see. Yes, I would think it is theoretically possible for friction in a building collapse to burn some amount of aluminum.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom