Why truthers are dangerouse!

[mudlark]

You need to read that again. Unless you have a different understanding of the word ´militarism´. In no way did I attack the on-the-ground troops.
Those pulling the strings are another matter altogether.

So who decides what questions are ´reasonable´?
If a question has in no way been fully answered or the content of that question has been found to be answered in an ambiguous or fraudulently misleading fashion (or not at all) the question still remains.

´thus the difference between those who ask resonable questions and Truthers.´
That´s not pigeon holing? Lol.

´Your screed about how mean people have been towards you is irrelevant to this request.´
Again with the ´reasonable doubts´. As above.
You need to read that again. When did I mention people being mean to me?

I stand by my last statement on the dangers and endless circle perpetuated by mass labelling and abuse as a substitute to debate and free thinking.

 

[TexasJack]

Let's hear your "reasonable" questions, there's plenty of threads here.

 

[TJM]

´thus the difference between those who ask resonable questions and Truthers.´
That´s not pigeon holing? Lol.

´Your screed about how mean people have been towards you is irrelevant to this request.´
Again with the ´reasonable doubts´. As above.
You need to read that again. When did I mention people being mean to me?

I stand by my last statement on the dangers and endless circle perpetuated by mass labelling and abuse as a substitute to debate and free thinking.

The quote button is your friend.

 

[9/11 Chewy Defense]

I keep getting these nasty messages from a YouTube Truther:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVDdjLQkUV8

TheCrimsonSkull (1 minute ago)

Hey AreTruthersRetarded aka WhyAskQuestions, why did you suck your grandmothers **** after she died? I heard your Mother had to pull you off her dead corpse, and your moth was all over her pussy. Why did you do that WAQoff?

In other words **** YOU


TheCrimsonSkull (26 seconds ago)

AreTruthersRetarded aka Sock account WhyAskQuestions licks his dead grandmother twat before going to bed at night. he dug her up and cut out her old rotten **** for himself.

In other words WAQofff **** YOU.

And slandering too:

TheCrimsonSkull (42 seconds ago)

"I hate ******* and f*ggots"
--WhyAskQuestions

"Who cares what you ******* think.. You're all the same and do the same stupid **** that a ****** does. Now **** off"
--WhyAskQuestions

"Who taught you ******* how to write, speak and be kindly? White people! I'm finished with your stupid ****** ass."
--WhyAskQuestions

TheCrimsonSkull (2 minutes ago)

"I like to touch the privates of children"
--WhyAskQuestions

"I licked my mothers ****"
--WhyAskQuestions

"your mother was chained up in my basement last night with my **** in her mouth"
--WhyAskQuestions

I do have his real name, home address & phone number!

 

[TruthersLie]

<ot>9/11 Chewie.

YOu have his name and home address? Sign him up for all the free catelogues you can find. All of them. Victoria secret, sharper image, woodworking weekly, the nambla assocation, scientologists, and the watchtower. Every month have the mormons send him a copy of the book of mormon. Call his local morman and Jehovahs witness branches and ask them to come by to talk about their religion...
Put him on the mailing list for the local republican and democrat parties.

come on here... you need to be really nasty.
</ot>

Back on topic.
There are such things as reasonable questions about the events of 9/11. Of course there are. When you find out about the event, you find more and more things which may not make sense, and with all of the BS on the internet from CT's, people often have questions.

The difference is that having questions means when you are supplied answers to your questions, you don't just shift shift shift to some new topic tryign to keep the conspiracy alive.

that is the difference.

 

[Hokulele]

I do not like the turn this thread has taken.

 

[TJM]

I do not like the turn this thread has taken.

nose dive is more like it.

 

[JihadJane]

Were you able to change the subject because the question makes you uncomforatble?

I've never been a supporter of Maoist denunciation rituals, the more so when those to be denounced are anonymous. For all we know it could be you writing that rubbish.

Ooops! Nope, you failed. My question to you is still wether you think that a movement composed of people who smuggle guns and explosives to violent fugitives, beat up teenage girls in wheelchairs, murder doctors, police officers and security guards and call for their critics skulls to be crushed agaibnst the sidewalk pavement can be considered "dangerous".

I assume you're talking about your precious twoof movement. If so, the answer is no. It is about as dangerous as the general public.

Aftwer you've answered that question, you can explain to me wether you think a movement composed of people who steal airplanes in flight and smash them into occupied buildings is "dangerous".

Irrelevant and off-topic question (Topic= "Why truthers are dangerous").

I look forward to your answers, "JihadJane".

I hope you enjoyed them, Sword_Of_Truth

Twoofers don't get to make that determination, sorry, JihadJane.

Childish rubbish.

The armed forces of nations from Canada and the US to England and Australia are still deployed around the world fighting radical islam on the assumption that the threat is global and as real on the streets of their home cities as it is on the streets of Kabul and Baghdad.

If this truly is their assumption those countries should be very worried about their armed forces. Fortunately, even propaganda-bombarded ordinary soldiers can see the difference between threats in Kabul and Baghdad and that on the streets in their home cities.

It's not even remotely "contreversial" it's just plain wrong. Some said the same thing about the nazis when the allied air offensive began in 1943. Some said the same thing about western anti-communist policies during the cold war and before the soviets lost.

Do typos makes you feel "uncomforatble"?

Equating the terrorist threat with that posed by the Nazis is the occupation of desperate fools. As for the Big Bad Bear, the threat to the US from the USSR was was wildly and dangerously exaggerated for the same political reasons as that from "al Qaeda" has been exaggerated. The military/congressional/industrial complex needs war and therefore a Big Bad Enemy in order to survive.

BTW, The USSR didn't lose the cold war. It collapsed due to internal economic contradictions, possibly with help from US economic saboteurs and vultures. I don't, however, expect you to give up your treasured myths of military victory.

You don't avoid war by declining to fight. That is what emboldens your enemies. It tells them your're a giant wussie and a pushover. Future wars are prevented by winning. That's what tells your enemies that you're a badass and not to be @#$%ed with.

Thanks for so eloquently expressing your playground mentality.

The "War on Terror" is a hoax. There is no war. Terrorism is far better undermined when it is treated as a crime and when its causes are addressed. Launching a global war against it is akin to insanity.

Violence frequently begets violence. For example, the more troops a quadmired US pours into Afghanistan the more "terrorists" it will create to oppose them.

 

[triforcharity]

Equating the terrorist threat with that posed by the Nazis is the occupation of desperate fools. As for the Big Bad Bear, the threat to the US from the USSR was was wildly and dangerously exaggerated for the same political reasons as that from "al Qaeda" has been exaggerated. The military/congressional/industrial complex needs war and therefore a Big Bad Enemy in order to survive.

BTW, The USSR didn't lose the cold war. It collapsed due to internal economic contradictions, possibly with help from US economic saboteurs and vultures. I don't, however, expect you to give up your treasured myths of military victory.

WTF?? Are you SERIOUS!?!?! Please tell me you bumped your head or something. You don't think parking an arsenal of Nucular Warheads off the coast of Florida, just a mere 90 miles away, you think that is no big deal?? You must have bumped your head.

No, it really was just a stalemate. USSR backed down. Plain and simple. Now, can you tell me where the USSR is now?? Oh, thats right. Nevermind.

The "War on Terror" is a hoax. There is no war. Terrorism is far better undermined when it is treated as a crime and when its causes are addressed. Launching a global war against it is akin to insanity.

Ok, so tell me. Was it NOT a crime when those crazy fools, hellbent on killing Americans, hijacked those planes, and crashed them into the WTC?? Mind you, killing amost 3,000 AMERICANS that day. That is NOT a crime?? I am confused.

BTW, I brought this up once before, I will bring it up again.

If there is no "War on Terror" than explain two things please.
1- Why has there NOT been a Terrorist attack on US Soil since 9/11??
2- Please explain what all those scumbags are doing in Gitmo.

Thanks.

Violence frequently begets violence. For example, the more troops a quadmired US pours into Afghanistan the more "terrorists" it will create to oppose them.

You damn right. When you come over here, and ******* attack us, and kill INNOCENT people, you had BETTER damn well believe we will return the favor.
But, you see, were not hijacking planes like them. We are much better than that.

It reminds me of the song by Toby Keith called "The Angry American" The courus goes,
"A mighty sucker punch came flying in
From somewhere in the back
Soon as we could see clearly
Through our big black eye
Man, we lit up your world
Like the 4th of July "

"Ohhh Justice will be served
And the battle will rage
This big dog will fight When you rattle his cage And you'll be sorry that you messed with
The U.S. of A.
'Cause we'll put a boot in your ass
It's the American way "


http://popup.lala.com/popup/432627043557575150

 

[Justin39640]

If this truly is their assumption those countries should be very worried about their armed forces. Fortunately, even propaganda-bombarded ordinary soldiers can see the difference between threats in Kabul and Baghdad and that on the streets in their home cities.

I guess you live no where near New York.

Equating the terrorist threat with that posed by the Nazis is the occupation of desperate fools. As for the Big Bad Bear, the threat to the US from the USSR was was wildly and dangerously exaggerated for the same political reasons as that from "al Qaeda" has been exaggerated. The military/congressional/industrial complex needs war and therefore a Big Bad Enemy in order to survive.

BTW, The USSR didn't lose the cold war. It collapsed due to internal economic contradictions, possibly with help from US economic saboteurs and vultures. I don't, however, expect you to give up your treasured myths of military victory.

Um
I don't think anyone would disagree that the USSR fell apart from the inside out. But perhaps part of their problem was spending most of their money competing with us in the arms race.

The "War on Terror" is a hoax. There is no war. Terrorism is far better undermined when it is treated as a crime and when its causes are addressed. Launching a global war against it is akin to insanity.

Violence frequently begets violence. For example, the more troops a quadmired US pours into Afghanistan the more "terrorists" it will create to oppose them.

I'm glad that your military analytical skills determined that a world wide conflict is a hoax. Ty for clearing that up.

OK, call the cops in the Sudan and the tribal regions of Pakistan, tell them you want to press charges.
Or did you have another idea of "addressing the cause" of terrorism? I wonder what road that would lead down....

 

[JihadJane]

WTF?? Are you SERIOUS!?!?! Please tell me you bumped your head or something. You don't think parking an arsenal of Nucular Warheads off the coast of Florida, just a mere 90 miles away, you think that is no big deal?? You must have bumped your head.

No, it really was just a stalemate. USSR backed down. Plain and simple. Now, can you tell me where the USSR is now?? Oh, thats right. Nevermind.

I'm serious. I suppose you think those missiles were put there to wipe the US off the map.

The USSR didn't "back down". It collapsed, just as the US is doing at the moment, with no help from Russia.

Ok, so tell me. Was it NOT a crime when those crazy fools, hellbent on killing Americans, hijacked those planes, and crashed them into the WTC?? Mind you, killing amost 3,000 AMERICANS that day. That is NOT a crime?? I am confused.

So am I. Where did I say/imply/hint that it wasn't a crime?

BTW, I brought this up once before, I will bring it up again.

If there is no "War on Terror" than explain two things please.
1- Why has there NOT been a Terrorist attack on US Soil since 9/11??
2- Please explain what all those scumbags are doing in Gitmo.

Thanks.

1) Possible reasons:

The threat to the US mainland was greatly exaggerated in the first place.

The vast US intelligence machine is less incompetent than before 911.

A lot of al Qeada operatives have been assassinated.

2)

They are wondering what crime they are going to be charged with and where the evidence of their scumbaggery is.

You damn right. When you come over here, and ******* attack us, and kill INNOCENT people, you had BETTER damn well believe we will return the favor.
But, you see, were not hijacking planes like them. We are much better than that.

Thanks for clarifying the US war aims, i.e revenge killing of innocent people

It reminds me of the song by Toby Keith called "The Angry American" The courus goes,
"A mighty sucker punch came flying in
From somewhere in the back
Soon as we could see clearly
Through our big black eye
Man, we lit up your world
Like the 4th of July "

"Ohhh Justice will be served
And the battle will rage
This big dog will fight When you rattle his cage And you'll be sorry that you messed with
The U.S. of A.
'Cause we'll put a boot in your ass
It's the American way "


http://popup.lala.com/popup/432627043557575150

America got the wrong ass and now it's running out of Japan's and China's money.

The "American Way" of the bully will soon be history.

 

[JihadJane]

I guess you live no where near New York.

So what?

Um
I don't think anyone would disagree that the USSR fell apart from the inside out. But perhaps part of their problem was spending most of their money competing with us in the arms race.

I'm glad that your military analytical skills determined that a world wide conflict is a hoax. Ty for clearing that up.

There is military action, but it's not a war on terror. It's an aggressive resource war and an industrial gangster enterprise.

OK, call the cops in the Sudan and the tribal regions of Pakistan, tell them you want to press charges.
Or did you have another idea of "addressing the cause" of terrorism? I wonder what road that would lead down....

What's bombing Pakistan achieving?

 

[triforcharity]

I'm serious. I suppose you think those missiles were put there to wipe the US off the map.

Were they there for Decoration?? Maybe for a playground for the little kids of the neighborhood?? WTF Jihad?? please tell me your a just playing dumb, and you really do understand what an ICDM that is topped with a nuke is for. It certainly isn't for making mashed potatoes.

The USSR didn't "back down". It collapsed, just as the US is doing at the moment, with no help from Russia.

Proof?? Collapsing?? Didn't FORD just post a 997 million dollar profit for the 3rd Quarter?? Hummm.....Yeah.....collapsing.......um.....No??

So am I. Where did I say/imply/hint that it wasn't a crime?

Maybe I am misunderstanding what this is saying. It seems to me like you blieve that the terrorists didn't exist and there was no crime, or something.

The "War on Terror" is a hoax. There is no war. Terrorism is far better undermined when it is treated as a crime and when its causes are addressed. Launching a global war against it is akin to insanity.

1) Possible reasons:

The threat to the US mainland was greatly exaggerated in the first place.

So, destroying 3 buildings, damaging a third, causing the deaths of 3,000 people, and causing the financial meltdown of 2001 was "GREATLY EXAGGERATED"??? If you believe that, please seek mental help.

The vast US intelligence machine is less incompetent than before 911.

I might agree with that. I think it is also that we are USING the intelligence that we DO receive to PREVENT it. Instead of sitting back feeling invincible like we used to, we brought the war to THEM.

A lot of al Qeada operatives have been assassinated.

Good. No harm there. What is your point?? Who do you think is helping to arrange the meeting with their maker??? Yepo, good old USofA. Damn straight, and don't you ever forget that.

2)

They are wondering what crime they are going to be charged with and where the evidence of their scumbaggery is.

Sorry, enemy combatants, with no gevernment affiliation, that wear no offical uniform, do not faall under the Geneva Convention protection. They know damn well what they are there for. Me personally, they could have left them in the desert with their insides on the outside, but, that is another topic for a complete nother thread.

Thanks for clarifying the US war aims, i.e revenge killing innocent people

Did I say that?? Um...No. Nice strawman. Are we seeking out nothing BUT innocent people?? No. Stop with the stupidity. Just try for once to stop being the American hater that you cleaarly are, and listen for a minute.

America got the wrong ass and now it's running out of money.

We did?? KSM?? What?? Money??? What does one have to do with the other?? You think this war is killing us?? Not hardly. The financial recession is from the housing bubble collapse, the idiots at banks writing loans to people who had no business owning a home, and nobody overseeing the two.

Sorry, that is the reason for the recession. BTW, 997 million dollar PROFIT for FMC this quarter.

 

[funk de fino]

There is military action, but it's not a war on terror. It's an aggressive resource war and an industrial gangster enterprise.

Very wrong. Ruppert junk again.

 

[funk de fino]

I guess you live no where near New York.

The poster known as JihadJane is a UK America hater but is too cowardly to admit it.

 

[W.D.Clinger]

I might agree with that. I think it is also that we are USING the intelligence that we DO receive to PREVENT it. Instead of sitting back feeling invincible like we used to, we brought the war to THEM.

It should be noted here that Iraq had no connection to the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

Sorry, enemy combatants, with no gevernment affiliation, that wear no offical uniform, do not faall under the Geneva Convention protection.

Untrue. Unlawful_combatant^WPs are protected by some provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Will

 

[mudlark]

I do not like the turn this thread has taken.

Did you see those figures I´ve posted on the mental health issues?
Personally, it took me back.

 

[johnny karate]

I stand by my last statement on the dangers and endless circle perpetuated by mass labelling and abuse as a substitute to debate and free thinking.

You might want to hit the refresh button on your web browser. You seem to be experiencing an error that only allows you to see this thread, and not the dozens of others that actually address and debate specific topics, and where all sorts of "free thinking" goes on.

 

[ImANiceGuy]

If I believe that the Bush administration is guilty of whitewashing the 9/11 investigation, due to their fear of being found negligent before the 2004 elections(and subsequently losing from poor public perception), but I do not belive in any CD theories, am I a Twoofer?

 

[Dave Rogers]

If I believe that the Bush administration is guilty of whitewashing the 9/11 investigation, due to their fear of being found negligent before the 2004 elections(and subsequently losing from poor public perception), but I do not belive in any CD theories, am I a Twoofer?

I would say that's a reasonable position to consider. What's your evidence that it's true?

Dave