Right, and I thought you said it was shameful for anyone who is not a mental health care professional to argue about diagnoses.
I suppose that might be what it looks like, I was responding emotionally for sure, I was mainly pointing out that people who did not have a background were arguing on the sincerity of Brendy. And that others were being abusive. If you feel that i made the statement you attribute to me then i would be in error and I apologise.
Is 35million people, actually more like 70 million in the US who could potentialy exhibit psychosis enough that there is a good chance someone is sincere?
I believe I've pointed out that even a qualified professional has no business trying to treat someone via a message board.
I think you would have to strech my sattements rather far to get that I was trying to treat Brendy.
Did you not say the following?
And if you want I can PM you my history, it is one the board and some here on this thread. Or we can discuss it here if you wish.
You're still tossing around "schizophrenia" and "bi-polar" yourself, and your qualifications to offer diagnosis over a message board is that you've had friends with these diseases? (If that's the qualification you're after, I doubt anyone here is NOT qualified.)
Um, I also can tell you my history, I mentioned four possible illness that could potentially cause the symtoms Brendy is allegedly presenting, and some others. I did noy say "you are faking a text book case of schizophrenia", did I?
Didn't you also say the following?
It is here on the JREF and in this thread, I will discuss it here if you wish, or in a PM
I've pretty much stated in every post that this forum is not an appropriate place for someone to turn to for mental health advice. It's a skeptic's forum.
It is a good place to discuss things however, not to get expert or even accurate advice.
I don't see how it's inappropriate for people to discuss possible explanations for Brendy's very strange posts. I've clumped them into three groups (mental illness, troll, or paranormal phenomena), and I think all three would be valid for discussion on this forum. Who are you to say any of them aren't legitimate?
When there is a significant number of people (70 million in the USA) at a minimum who could exhibit the presentation Brendy was giving, how appropriate is it for people to guess that they are faking it?
I have no problem with, for example, Bruto's post (above) making a case that Brendy is not a troll. His argument might even change my mind. However, that's not the same as saying it's inappropriate to discuss the possibility.
Fair enough. I think the mocking and abuse is to be expected. It's an anonymous forum. Anyone can join for the price of an e-mail address. Brendy's OP was really bizarre.
Not that bizarre, when you consider the millions of people who have those kinds of experiences, it is POV I guess, but for you bizarre)
Even the thread title is strange--and accuses everyone here of being in a conspiracy or something. I'd be surprised if Brendy didn't expect to get some mocking and abuse--even if he is being completely sincere.
FWIW, I think the moderators do a fine job of moderating these days.
They have the whole time I have been here.