Let me ask YOU a simple question!
Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?
have you been drinking? Not only does the above make no sense, but I do not even speak German.
TAM
Let me ask YOU a simple question!
Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?
Dr. Haritt spent a year and a half carefully analyzing the debris and writing the paper.
Let me ask YOU a simple question!
Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?
Here is my entry to the challenge:
I believe this meets the challenge criteria and passed. How do you respond?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrUiPGwOReM
T....Heiwa has answered your question on the''Heiwa Challenge'' page. I was wondering when you are going to reply ? This could be a highly interesting debate between you.
"... highly interesting ..."??
Not a chance.
I know what I'm talking about. It makes the discussion both one-sided and annoying.
Well...actually No.... I see Heiwa giving you an education in structural damage analysis (about which you know nothing btw).
Let me ask YOU a simple question!
Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?
I thought I had de ja vu until I realized he did this twice.... once here, and the other in response to TK... If that is the apparent standard for AE911truth expertise..... god help them...have you been drinking? Not only does the above make no sense, but I do not even speak German.
TAM![]()
I thought I had de ja vu until I realized he did this twice.... once here, and the other in response to TK... If that is the apparent standard for AE911truth expertise..... god help them...
His public breakdown is giving me the creeps. Does anyone else feel that way?
You're funny!I was wondering when you are going to reply ?
If it really is 'bullcrap from start to finish', you will be able to describe at least one thing that has "turned out the way you predicted"This post is a virtual twin to the one in which I used the 'Bullcrap' remark. Therefore I must repeat myself. Bullcrap from start to finish.Thoughtful answer--exactly what we've learned to expect. In the meantime, you remain trapped in 2005. No escape is possible. Events have exposed all of your delusions. Absolutely nothing turned out the way you predicted. You can't learn; you can't adapt; you can't submit your cherished myths to the slightest bit of critical examination. You've been selected for extinction by inexorable evolutionary forces.
Please, EITHER do so OR accept that your reputation as a self-deluding and willfully-ignorant liar will become further entrenched in the minds of those reading this thread
yah that comment came out of nowhere, and was just...insane.
TAM![]()
“The distinction I am concerned with in this book is the distinction between true and false religion that underlies more specific distinctions such as Jews and Gentiles, Christians and pagans, Muslims and unbelievers..
Once the distinction is made, however, a new type of religion comes into existence, something that must be called a “’counter-religion’ because it rejects and repudiates everything that went before and what is outside itself as ‘paganism
Let me ask YOU a simple question!
Now tell, how do you do it with the religion? Or in original: TAM , nun sag, wie hast du's mit der Religion?
My entry to the Heiwa challenge:
Let's see if I get my million bucks.
The Heiwa Challenge structure must obviously be real! And there is no money involved. Just honour!
See post #1 above.
BTW I'll pay you $1M if you can produce a structure that can be crushed like that. Suteki desu ne!? Get working!
A model, it fell; you win. Heiwa was telling a lie like all the tripe he posts.My entry to the Heiwa challenge:
Let's see if I get my million bucks.
yah that comment came out of nowhere, and was just...insane.
TAM![]()
Honour?The Heiwa Challenge structure must obviously be real! And there is no money involved. Just honour!
I believe it better translates into the God question.
He is trying to tie in each sides "beliefs", and how we justify them. Then again, who really eff'n knows?
Here is a paper on it.http://www.lsu.edu/artsci/groups/voegelin/EVS/2004 Papers/Hollweck2004.htm
THE GOD-QUESTION. JAN ASSMAN’S THE MOSAIC DISTINCTION AND THE RETURN OF THE REPRESSED IN THE “POST-SECULAR” AGE
BY THOMAS HOLLWECK
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER